I added yours. It's easy to add the results into the the spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...fwg/edit#gid=0
Printable View
I added yours. It's easy to add the results into the the spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...fwg/edit#gid=0
Added mine to the spreadsheet.
Could you put in the Calabrese sample, the Greeks etc. I posted a few pages back?
Let's get Calabria in there:
Population
ANE 7.77%
ASE 0.40%
WHG-UHG 26.03%
East_Eurasian 0.46%
West_African -
East_African 3.44%
ENF 61.89%
and Crete:
Population
ANE 10.54%
ASE 0.98%
WHG-UHG 27.72%
East_Eurasian -
West_African 0.22%
East_African -
ENF 60.55%
And Campania:
Population
ANE 9.88%
ASE 0.90%
WHG-UHG 29.77%
East_Eurasian -
West_African 0.07%
East_African 1.20%
ENF 58.18%
And Greek Islands 2:
Population
ANE 9.34%
ASE 2.60%
WHG-UHG 36.45%
East_Eurasian -
West_African 0.11%
East_African 0.47%
ENF 51.03%
One thing I don't agree with this map is Lithuanian being the most northern shifted. With 23andme too. This skews the results cause the Lithuanian should be eastern shifted. A Norwegian should be the sample for the most northern shifted instead.
Why is cmv88's father not right next to East Sicily and Greek islands?
As funny as it may sound, he doesn't have enough ASE / South Indian. You can drift away from a country for these reasons too, even if you lack some African and the average has some. The calculator doesn't care what you consider good or bad, you need all of them to plot closer.
Most Southeastern Aprician award.
If we put every Sicilian and Greek islander on there, they'd make one large cluster and Longbowman would be in it too.
They have more indigenous HG. Nothing arbitrary it's a genetic reality, but again they lack the Western of typical Scandinavians which make them more European in some sense. What we have in mind as the epitome of Northern European is Northern but also Western. It isn't only made of "North stuff".
You can also see it like this if you prefer, it's more natural with our geographical perception :
Spoiler!
Amazing work guys, you rock :D
Question : Im not exactly next to "Norman" (or is it just a name?), because i have a German/Polish Great grandparent?
This admixture analysis wwas done by Polako in which 7 admixture components were chosen. We collected the samples based on k7 run and I run principal component analysis ( PCA) to transform multivariate data (7 variables in this case) to 2 principal components such that most variation in the original data is preserved. This is done for visual exploration of the data on 2D plane.
You are more NorthWest than Eleonore, and firemonkey is more NorthEast than both. You are all really close and with Armstrong too as expected.
it's a Normand i added because i knew he had 4 grandparent from Normandy. This map actually shows an amazing thing for you, and this is the perfect example, you are right on the vertical line of a Norman (Which is the North/South ratio) and also exactly on the horizontal line of all Germanic population and probably a central average German (if we had one around). What had to be demonstrated...Norman + 1/4 German.
Which means you re ethnically Normand with a East shift (possibly even a bit Eastern German). If we had that map when we saw your results it would have been perfectly clear right away. That's how PCA charts like this can be much better than calculators. There s some limitations that we could talk about but it really makes it easier to visualize someone's genetic.
Interesting to have some Belgians on there, is one Flemish and the other Walloon, or is this just natural variation within one group?
Added a couple of only (high quality SNP samples) to that list. Battle axe Late Neolthic Sweden, Iron Age Briton & Sintashta Culture. Also the Western Scottish average Argyll.
And AneK7 isnt outdated yet. It's still fine.
Added the lebanese averages, but it might squeeze every one together too much. Which means that the writing would be hard to see.
Always had a feeling I would plot within the Northwestern quadrant of the PCA chart... nonetheless good work on the samples! :thumb001:
I used median values for some populations due to sample outliers that can affect the average values. If you add samples outside of Europe such as the middle east , then we will need to increase the resolution to make the text visible for the subjects that are positioned closer to each other . Update (3200x1800 resolution): http://postimg.org/image/ljjmq94er/full/
There is one thing that might need to be fixed. Is that ASE is going to nudge people a little more North than they should be, due to who has the highest scores. So it might be an idea to find someone or a group that can correct it. But it will only makes a small difference.
ANE I think is pulling a bit too hard also.
ASE is in the range of 0-3.37
WHG 10.1-80.23
ENF f 0-80.33
ANE 6.66 – 21.92
The admixture proportions that have the largest ranges will dominate two principal components that we plot the most . Because there is a higher variation in WHG values. So, in the northern direction it will be the WHG admixture component, while ASE won't make much difference. Larger ANE admixture component pulls members in the north-eastern direction. Let's say among members who have higher WHG proportion those who also have higher
What population would be down of my position in the map?
Graham I removed the ASE component from data and generated the plot. See if you can find much difference it has made to north-south gradient : http://postimg.org/image/ih8olhit9/full/
I'd leave ASE as it is.
Interesting redo. I notice there's a cluster of people south of me and if I'm reading this right, Graham's to the northwest.