Originally Posted by
Sterling Archer
My point was to show the diversity. To show that there is a great deal of heterogeneity (not everything as clear cut as you suggest), and that northern parts are have not been tested enough. They constitute a substantial part of the population, and are predominantly Azerbaijani.
As for the northern regions we have:
Qusar - yes, majority Lezgin, but has some Azerbaijani villages.
Quba - not that many Lezgins in comparison, predominately tats that have been assimilated by now. I would know, I am from Quba.
Khachmaz - predominantly Azeri, with substantial Lezgin population.
Ismailli - Molokans in here are mainly concentrated in Ivanovak, which only has 3000 people. In total, the Russians constitute negligible part of the population of Ismayilli. The rest is Azerbaijani plus Lezgin, which are going full assimilation.
Qax, Balakan etc. - you are clearly underestimating speed with which the assimilation has advanced. This regions have long ago became predominantly Azeri.
Then there is Sheki, Shamaki, Oguz, Siyazan, Shabran. And you are telling me this does not count? :D
There is no clear consensus on ethnogenesis of Azerbaijanis. Hence the substantial difference between different sub-populations. There was a PCA plot somewhere which shows this clearly. Yes, some sub-populations such as southern regions, Karabakh are very close to Iranian Azerbaijanis (notice importance of geographic proximity), while the northern regions (+ Derbend) clearly differ. These northern regions are not as small as you trying to portray them. Assimilation that has been ongoing for centuries had changed the region's ethnic composition.