0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 328/0 Given: 195/0 |
My point was to show the diversity. To show that there is a great deal of heterogeneity (not everything as clear cut as you suggest), and that northern parts are have not been tested enough. They constitute a substantial part of the population, and are predominantly Azerbaijani.
As for the northern regions we have:
Qusar - yes, majority Lezgin, but has some Azerbaijani villages.
Quba - not that many Lezgins in comparison, predominately tats that have been assimilated by now. I would know, I am from Quba.
Khachmaz - predominantly Azeri, with substantial Lezgin population.
Ismailli - Molokans in here are mainly concentrated in Ivanovak, which only has 3000 people. In total, the Russians constitute negligible part of the population of Ismayilli. The rest is Azerbaijani plus Lezgin, which are going full assimilation.
Qax, Balakan etc. - you are clearly underestimating speed with which the assimilation has advanced. This regions have long ago became predominantly Azeri.
Then there is Sheki, Shamaki, Oguz, Siyazan, Shabran. And you are telling me this does not count?
There is no clear consensus on ethnogenesis of Azerbaijanis. Hence the substantial difference between different sub-populations. There was a PCA plot somewhere which shows this clearly. Yes, some sub-populations such as southern regions, Karabakh are very close to Iranian Azerbaijanis (notice importance of geographic proximity), while the northern regions (+ Derbend) clearly differ. These northern regions are not as small as you trying to portray them. Assimilation that has been ongoing for centuries had changed the region's ethnic composition.I don't know if you know about the history of Azerbaijan but I have to say that turkic people of Azerbaijan Republic mostly came from either from Iranian Azerbaijan or Anatolia (North West region mainly). So I think it's impossible to say that Azerbaijanis in Republic is closer to Caucasian people rather than Iranian Azerbaijanis.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 328/0 Given: 195/0 |
I have attended classes of Azerbaijani history, and no offense, they are chock full of fallacies. So much revisionism of history, attempts to Turkify almost everything that I can't take it seriously, neither should you.I don't know if you know about the history of Azerbaijan
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 26/2 Given: 5/1 |
I just wrote some of the ethnic groups in these regions, of course there are many others. One thing is clear that Azerbaijani turks are not majority in: Qusar, Quba, Balakan, Qakh, Zagatala and not surprisingly in those regions NE is very high. Turks of those places are very few and they probably are assimilated lezgins, avars and etc and they.
Other regions that you have mentioned (Shaki, Oghuz, Qabala, Siyazan and Shamakhy) here have Turkic majority and again not surprisingly they have normal NE for Azerbaijanis around 9%, 10% and sometimes 11%. Ismailly can be a bit different because there are significant Molokan and Lezgin population there.
I'm not saying Nothern part are small or something. I'm just saying that most of the Northern region are populated by other ethnic groups. Azerbaijanis of those places are very few and they are mostly assimilated Caucasians.
Any other region (not only Karabakh) has nearly the same averages with Iranian Azerbaijan despite the 200 years of separation.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 328/0 Given: 195/0 |
Azeris are majority in Quba, Khachmaz, Balakan, Qakh and Zaqatala, only exception being Qusar. This is a fact. I have not seen any other statistics contrary to this and I don't know where you take your data. What Azeris have assimilated here is irrelevant (by that logic, Azeris in the south probably have assimilated talysh, kurd etc. Do we disregard them?), the result is that they are Azeris, just like in Derbent, Tabriz, Kars, Kalbajar (had major Kurdish populations), Lachin (again, used to have big Kurdish).
So, you can't disregard the Northern regions, as they are majority Azeri and should be further studied.
Few results from this regions suggest NE>10% usually. They are close to Azerbaijani_Dagestan rather than Azerbaijani_Iran.Other regions that you have mentioned (Shaki, Oghuz, Qabala, Siyazan and Shamakhy) here have Turkic majority and again not surprisingly they have normal NE for Azerbaijanis around 9%, 10% and sometimes 11%. Ismailly can be a bit different because there are significant Molokan and Lezgin population there.
That is why I mentioned geographic proximity, it is key here. I'm not denying that say Karabakh Azeris are close to Iranian Azeris. What I'm trying to stress is that there is a very big potion of the country that is not accounted for. Contrary to what you are incorrectly saying, they should be accounted for. For example, not that many results from Quba. One Azerbaijani from Quba that I know scored NE=16% (or 18%). And that whole region is missing. More tests will surely show the differences between different population clusters.Any other region (not only Karabakh) has nearly the same averages with Iranian Azerbaijan despite the 200 years of separation.
This is not a bad thing![]()
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,319/30 Given: 2,681/16 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
Hey Lucas not that I care much about Vahaduo but these 2 clowns (Leto and Kyp) are trying to make you an accomplice in their manipulation of Kurdish averages. I 1st became suspicious of them when they removed the Dodecad K12 calculator creators Kurdish averages which are listed at Gedmatch.
Neither one of the two are kurds or have any Kurdish DNA blogs so they really don't have any business playing with Kurdish averages.
In fact if you check the KurdishDNA blogspot at http://kurdishdna.blogspot.com/search?q=dodecad
you'll see Dodecad K12 screen shots of about 20 Kurdish DNA project members which include 9 Sorani Kurds and 3 Feyli Kurds. For example if you check the Sorani and Feyli averages are close to the Dodecad K12 calculator creator's averages shown below and not what those clowns have had you put into Vahaduo. Additionally those averages (Kurdish DNA project) agree with the Iraqi kurd averages too.
Population Gedrosia Siberian Northwest_African Southeast_Asian Atlantic_Med North_European South_Asian East_African Southwest_Asian East_Asian Caucasus Sub_Saharan Kurd 28.7 1.5 0.9 0.4 5.9 5.7 1.1 0.4 14 1 40.4 0 Kurds 28.2 0.6 0 0.6 6.3 6.7 0.8 0.1 14.3 0.2 42.2 0
Also they have no authority to declare what Iranian Kurdish averages are without proof such as from the authors. In fact, I did take the time to investigate and found about 7 or 8 that are genetically kurds based on formal stats, IBD and other means and those averages don't agree with what they are feeding you.
You can do whatever you want but IMO to maintain some credibility for yourself I would keep whatever averages where included by the Dodecad K12 calculator creator and wait until the authors supply info on who is Kurd and who is not.
I would also require solid evidence from people claiming that an average is off or purporting they have the correct average and not just take their word for it.![]()
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Um, excuse me but I have only added one Kurdish average - Kurd_KAZ and I now think it can be deleted. Kurmanji and Sorani are from a spreadsheet compiled a few years ago by a Turk who posts on Anthrogenica. Neither I nor Kyp had a hand in that. IMO they look okay.
@Zoro, I do think you should leave this forum. Or at the very least leave this particular thread and don't come back.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Don't need to add them otherwise we would have too many Iranian averages. Please delete one of the "Turkmen_Iran" duplicates btw.
@Zoro I only created Yazidi average, the "Kurd_Iran" shouldn't be added (as I said), they are just based on the samples from the Iranian study YOU YOURSELF suspected as the Kurdish samples. But since we can't be 100% sure all of them are Kurds we shouldn't add it.
Last edited by Kyp; 01-06-2021 at 11:01 AM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,096/184 Given: 1,505/100 |
So why did you call the Yezidi average just Yezidi ? and not Yezidi_Kurd as I see people making even averages like Altaien_Turk or calling Iranian Azeri averages, Iran_Azerbaijani?
And who made the Zaza average? If you guys meant it in the way to distinguish the Kurdish subgroups fine but why than call the Soran and Kurmanj averages Kurd in the naming?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks