Originally Posted by
reboun
Molecular biology and genetics are really helpful in many aspects of our lives and in the future they are going to be far more important than they are today. However, people of 100 years later will most probably claim “It is very weird that humans used to estimate their ethnicity solely looking at their DNA results” just like people of today mostly think “It is very weird that humans of 100 years ago used to estimate their ethnicity solely looking at their skull metrics”.
These are my thoughts about the future of DNA tests which are used for ethnicity estimations.
I think DNA 'ethnicity estimates' became popular because there is no such thing as an 'ethnic American'. To be sure American used to mean English, Scottish or Dutch Protestant then the Irish, Eastern Europeans, and Southern Europeans came and then all kinds of people from all over the world came now there is no such thing as an ethnic American. To be sure the Netherlands etc.. too is somewhat multi-cultural too but there are still ethnic Dutch people in the majority :
The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrow-mindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/mar...festo/ch01.htm
Bookmarks