0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,473 Given: 31,677 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,333 Given: 2,699 |
There is nothing much special about Corded, it is merely an exaggeratedly high vaulted Nordic variety.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,333 Given: 2,699 |
Corded is higher-vaulted, everything else is basically indistinguishable. Being really sincere here, no Anthropologist would be able to accurately distinguish a Corded from a 'Atlanto-Mediterranean' skull. Coon admits it on TRoE: the Corded crania are larger than any from Egypt, and are metrically very similar to the Elmenteita skulls from East Africa - the two groups could be combined without loss of homogeneity.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,333 Given: 2,699 |
I remember reading a recent paper of a Russian Physical Anthropologist trying to distinguish Nordics from Mediterraneans by PCA-ing immense series of each type and running some discriminant algorithms in it. The results were not conclusive, and he used much more variables than Coon did in his book. But presumably Nordic narrow-faced 'Indo-European' series did showed more affinity to each other. Probably the easiest way to distinguish closely related human skulls by phenotype is by looking at metric and nonmetric dental traits.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks