The United States Of Failing Empire

**Luigi Galleani** · 01-04-2013, 06:38 AM

Has anybody heard of Dianne Feinstein?

She is a closet zionist on the senate comittee of intelligence.

There seems to be a lot of closet zionists running around government office and homeland security these days....

Dual citizens? Anywho, capitalizing on latest national tragedies she wants to ban the selling of just about every firearm from private citizens.

There are rumors of future gun confiscations door to door style and through military checkpoints. What is the government preparing for the American citizenry?

Is it that inevitable economic collapse around the corner the next ten years that anybody with a half a brain knows about?

Is that why they are so eager to disarm private citizens?

Fullscale military martial law in the near future?

What do you think fellow countrymen and women?

**Stefan** · 01-04-2013, 06:50 AM

Diane Feinstein

Please don't remind me of her. I do know that she, along with New York City's mayor Bloomberg, and a multitude of others, are despicable, illegal authoritarians who want to spread the policies they've imposed on their regions (and plus some) to the whole nation. They're the domestic enemies of which we've been warned about by history.

**Luigi Galleani** · 01-04-2013, 06:55 AM

Stefan, while I like some libertarian ideas the movement itself has always striked me as being entirely Randian who in my disdain I have contempt for as philosophical cultists.

Ayn Rand was one of the worst things to happen to post modern philosophy. Seperate note.

Even Ron Paul has admitted his passion for her philosophy.

Others like Alan Greenspan and Milton Friedman have spoke about their passion for her philosophy also. Wait, weren't they former federal reserve heads who's institution Ron Paul constantly criticizes?

That is weird. Ron Paul advocates the constitution yet Ayn Rand said virtue and morality is a weakness concerning her relative ethics. Weird also.

What else is there to criticize of the libertarian movement in the United States?

The desire to switch to a gold standard for one.

Now who controls the world gold reserves?

**Siberyak** · 01-04-2013, 06:58 AM

America is on the path of other failed civilizations. Sad but true

**Luigi Galleani** · 01-04-2013, 07:01 AM

Originally Posted by Siberyak

America is on the path of other failed civilizations. Sad but true

Rome. Act II

**Luigi Galleani** · 01-04-2013, 07:13 AM

Going back to the libertarian conversation I asked who controls the world's gold reserves.

Anybody here know?

I will tell you. It is the same fiat money master central banks that also control the world gold reserves.

When you switch over from one monopolistic system to another, what have you fixed?

What does Ron Paul hope to achieve running as a political independent alternative?

Ah, so nothing would really change under a new gold reserve currency then?

Libertarianism is also very capitalistic and I don't really support capitalism.

Socialist! Communist! Marxist!

Umm, no, I don't support state run versions of those isms either.

I am just a humble anarchist/ anarcho syndicalist who believes in mutual economic prosperity within a nationalized frame between local communities.

**Stefan** · 01-04-2013, 07:19 AM

Originally Posted by Luigi Galleani

Stefan, while I like some libertarian ideas the movement itself has always striked me as being entirely Randian who in my disdain I have contempt for as philosophical cultists.

Ayn Rand was one of the worst things to happen to post modern philosophy. Seperate note.

Even Ron Paul has admitted his passion for her philosophy.

Others like Alan Greenspan and Milton Friedman have spoke about their passion for her philosophy also. Wait, weren't they former federal reserve heads who's institution Ron Paul constantly criticizes?

That is weird. Ron Paul advocates the constitution yet Ayn Rand said virtue and morality is a weakness concerning her relative ethics. Weird also.

What else is there to criticize of the libertarian movement in the United States?

The desire to switch to a gold standard for one.

Now who controls the world gold reserves?

Libertarians are very diverse. The one major distinction is whether or not they're Anarchists or Minarchists. Then there is the distinction based on technicalities of the non-Aggression axiom, etc, etc. I adhere to the belief of Classic Liberalism for example, but there are the more extreme libertarians who are Anarcho-Capitalists, and I probably think they're just as crazy as you do.

Also, much of what Ayn Rand said was kind of bad, but I also agree with much of what she said. She was a well educated woman and knew very much about the principles of the United States which made it great. Of course, she was very extreme with her "objectivism" but otherwise a lot of her ideals align with those of Paleo-Conservatives and are certainly not exclusive to nor derived from - her.

By the way Milton Friedman also criticized the federal reserve from a few videos I've watched, if I recall correctly. Of course, it was a less apparent problem back then.

I very much like this interview with Ayn Rand.

[YOUTUBE]s1RxKW-P5V8[/YOUTUBE]

**Luigi Galleani** · 01-04-2013, 07:29 AM

Stefan later on I will reply to your very well thought out post.

As for me call me an idealist but I want to create a entirely new system altogether.

I reject both state run capitalism and socialism as I view neither fulfilling any vehicle of change for the problems of this world. I'd like to see the concept of centralized government abolished.

**Stefan** · 01-04-2013, 07:47 AM

That's where I'm different. I see the need for federalism so that the individual states (or mob rule) don't (doesn't) become tyrannous and so that the union works together for the benefit of all, as long as there is no infringement on individual rights. I'm mostly a constitutionalist, which inherently implies some form of minarchism.

Minarchism (also known as minimal statism) is a libertarian capitalist political philosophy. It is variously defined by sources. In the strictest sense, it holds that states ought to exist (as opposed to anarchy), that their only legitimate function is the protection of individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud, and that the only legitimate governmental institutions are the military, police, and courts. In the broadest sense, it also includes fire departments, prisons, the executive, and legislatures as legitimate government functions. Such states are generally called night-watchman states.
Minarchists argue that the state has no authority to use its monopoly on force to interfere with free transactions between people, and see the state's sole responsibility as ensuring that contracts between private individuals and property are protected, through a system of law courts and enforcement. Minarchists generally believe a laissez-faire approach to the economy is most likely to lead to economic prosperity.