2



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 145/0 Given: 257/0 |
R1b1b2a1a2f* =64
R1b1b2a1a= 46
I1*= 41
R1b1b2a1a1*= 28
R1b1b2a1a1 =21
The vast majority are U106 subcaldes and than I1 with some R1a
H= 68
H1 =53
T2b =43
Lots of Ks and Us.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,058/134 Given: 5,444/57 |
Okay so how the hell do you do this lol?





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 37,390/1,390 Given: 39,766/2,452 |
Who is rich? He who is happy with what he has - Simeon ben Zoma, Ethics of the Fathers, Talmud, Avot 4:1
I live here. I also live here.
Europeans worldwide * Longbowman's family on 23andme * Classify Longbowman * Ask Longbowman anything


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,058/134 Given: 5,444/57 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,951/33 Given: 11,012/33 |
Ok here's mine. U106 is the single largest group although P312 is about 60% of the R1b, which is the same as in England. R1b represents about 60% of my ancestry according to this, which is also in line for where i'm from, I 20%, R1a is about 7%, and E, G, J, T etc Neolithic-related are about 12%, N and Q make up about 1.3% altogether. My U152 and L21 are about normal.
R1b U106 144 27.01688555
R1b U152 31 5.816135084
R1b L21 123 23.07692308
R1b P312* 15 2.814258912
Other R1b 2 0.375234522
I1 65 12.19512195
I2b1 27 5.065666041
other I2 15 2.814258912
R1a 37 6.941838649
E 32 6.003752345
F 1 0.187617261
G 13 2.43902439
J 18 3.377110694
N 3 0.562851782
Q 4 0.750469043
T 2 0.375234522
H 1 0.187617261
![]()
Last edited by Jackson; 02-28-2014 at 03:45 PM.






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,951/33 Given: 11,012/33 |
I just noticed that if you divide groups into their ethno-cultural associations, and then divide the 'other' groups evenly (but a bit in favour of 'Celtic', due to Roman influence in Britain), it fits almost perfectly with POBI's estimate of Celtic vs Germanic for that red blob in south,central and eastern England. And the actual numerical counts of each haplogroup are quite similar to what was found by population studies, quite interesting. And of course the total 60% R1b is remarkable as well. I'll do one for my mt-dna soon.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7,544/104 Given: 6,827/203 |
mtDNA
H - 75
H1 - 39
J1c - 23
H7 - 12
T1a1 - 12
Y-DNA
E1b1b1a2*(E-V13) - 75
I2a2b - 44
R1a1a - 34
R1b1b2a - 23
J2b2* - 20


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,165/182 Given: 0/0 |
mtDNA
H 75
H1 72
T2b 50
H3 33
V 20
y-dna
R1b1b2a1a2f* 92
R1b1b2a1a 47
I1* 47
R1b1b2a1a1* 25
R1b1b2a1a2f2 20



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,756/81 Given: 5,912/35 |
Looking at Robert & Jackson, it does reflect well in Jackson being South East, most common U106. Robert being R-L21.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,756/81 Given: 5,912/35 |
MtDNA
H 71
H1 68
H3 45
T2b 32
T1a1 23
Y-DNA
R1b1b2a1a2f* 115
I1* 42
R1b1b2a1a 39
R1b1b2a1a1 26
R1b1b2a1a1* 23
R1b1b2a1a2f 23
R1b1b2a1a2f2 21
R1a1a 20
I1 16
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks