0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 33/5 Given: 4/5 |
Like I said, some 'pathans' in india or pakistan are probably much more south asian shifted/oriented. Those samples were probably from said 'pathans' from india/pakistan and not actually from afghanistan let alone the tribal areas in pakistan. We look different to almost every indian aside from kashmiris, we have a completely different set of cultures to them and speak entirely different languages. Just take a look at any of the studies on afghan pashtuns and you'll see they cluster with themselves and not with any indian.
Also, I'm saying that we're south asian shifted meaning there definitely IS south asian influence, but to believe we're completely south asian is just troll tier


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,427/264 Given: 682/83 |
south Asians are hetrogenous people my friend not homogenous like Chinese.. tell me what similarities does kashmiris,tamils and north easterners have with one another. but yet we are all south Asians. you guys are no different. indians speak various language too but it is foolish to say we aint south Asians just because we have tiny bit differnces among us.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 33/5 Given: 4/5 |
Sounds like you need to open up a history book - if you can't you could even learn this stuff from wikipedia. The ghorids are contested to be either pashtun or tajik and I personally believe they were tajik. The ghaznavids were not completely turkic, mahmud of ghazni was half turkic half persian (nowadays tajik). The armies of these dynasties and several others were most definitely composed of pashtuns among other muslims at the time. And dude, seriously you need to learn history, even wikipedia would expand your knowledge to something more than whatever it is they tell you at the gurdwaras lol. Ghaznavids, delhi sultanates, durranis - these were all arguably pashtun engineered rule over parts of what is now pakistan and india - no matter the dynasty, pashtun or tajik (I'm both by the way) they ruled over parts of india for decades to centuries at a time. And yes, the sikhs were able to fight off pashtun aggression but let's be honest it was done with quite a bit of british help not to mention the durrani and ghilzai tribes were always infighting with one another at the time, sometimes even switching allegiances to the punjabi/british side to gain favor after the victory.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 33/5 Given: 4/5 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 521/45 Given: 175/21 |
The cluster Map you've shown represents the pakistani pashtuns, they are significantly more South Asian than the afghan pashtuns. The afgghan pashtuns forms the gap berween the iranian cluster and Pathan cluster. Language wise yes, we speak a iranic language. Phenotypically we are iranid. Not North indid. There's no self hate.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 33/5 Given: 4/5 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 521/45 Given: 175/21 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks