Page 6 of 41 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 409

Thread: Pashtuns: A genetically South Asian ethnicity wrapped in self hate(?)

  1. #51
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Online
    02-25-2021 @ 10:35 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    guess
    Ethnicity
    guess
    Country
    Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    60
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 33/5
    Given: 4/5

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truthbetold View Post
    We saw the plots, PCA's, and quotes from genetic papers on the first page. Personal opinions can't change reality especially when hard facts are posted. Pashtuns are a South-Central Asian people, historically and culturally. Their tribalistic culture and overal mores are close to Central Asians. But genetically, they're clearly South Asian.
    If they're not South Asian genetically (as in belonging with other South Asians), then so are not the Punjabi Jatts, Kashmiris, Sindhi's, Himachali's, High Caste Northern Hindu Indians etc, whom the Pashtuns cluster closely with, and yes such statement would be an obvious fallacy.
    Like I said, some 'pathans' in india or pakistan are probably much more south asian shifted/oriented. Those samples were probably from said 'pathans' from india/pakistan and not actually from afghanistan let alone the tribal areas in pakistan. We look different to almost every indian aside from kashmiris, we have a completely different set of cultures to them and speak entirely different languages. Just take a look at any of the studies on afghan pashtuns and you'll see they cluster with themselves and not with any indian.

    Also, I'm saying that we're south asian shifted meaning there definitely IS south asian influence, but to believe we're completely south asian is just troll tier

  2. #52
    Veteran Member jatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    12-03-2017 @ 12:49 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    jatt
    Ethnicity
    south asian
    Country
    India
    Gender
    Posts
    3,222
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1,427/264
    Given: 682/83

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scytsar View Post
    Is that what they teach you in the gurdwaras? Listen I like sikhs and think of them as good people but by god some of them (only an online phenomenon to be honest) are literally retarded. You think pashtuns, who literally caused a sikh holocaust twice, who invaded india with the samanids, ghorids, ghaznavids, durranis so on and so forth give a crap that they lost some clay to some sikhs who were heavily aided by the british?

    And pakistanis worship us? Dude, we hate pakistanis and they hate us. We like indians, they like us. And no, that thing you said about singh nalwa or whatever is a self propagated myth by the sikhs, something to make themselves feel a little better after losing so hard.
    ghorids and ghaznavids were not pashtoons they were turkiks. the only time pashtoons ever controlled indian part of Punjab was just one year which Sikhs wrestled back from them including many afghan controlled territories.

  3. #53
    Veteran Member jatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    12-03-2017 @ 12:49 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    jatt
    Ethnicity
    south asian
    Country
    India
    Gender
    Posts
    3,222
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1,427/264
    Given: 682/83

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scytsar View Post
    Like I said, some 'pathans' in india or pakistan are probably much more south asian shifted/oriented. Those samples were probably from said 'pathans' from india/pakistan and not actually from afghanistan let alone the tribal areas in pakistan. We look different to almost every indian aside from kashmiris, we have a completely different set of cultures to them and speak entirely different languages. Just take a look at any of the studies on afghan pashtuns and you'll see they cluster with themselves and not with any indian.

    Also, I'm saying that we're south asian shifted meaning there definitely IS south asian influence, but to believe we're completely south asian is just troll tier
    south Asians are hetrogenous people my friend not homogenous like Chinese.. tell me what similarities does kashmiris,tamils and north easterners have with one another. but yet we are all south Asians. you guys are no different. indians speak various language too but it is foolish to say we aint south Asians just because we have tiny bit differnces among us.

  4. #54
    Veteran Member jatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    12-03-2017 @ 12:49 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    jatt
    Ethnicity
    south asian
    Country
    India
    Gender
    Posts
    3,222
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1,427/264
    Given: 682/83

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scytsar View Post
    What 'dress like arabs' are you referring to? Just because the dresses look similar doesn't mean they're the same. What arab servitude? Are you just pulling random anecdotes out of nowhere? It seems to me you believe that anybody who's muslim worships arabs.
    there are many Pakistani and pashtoon forums .. log onto them and you will get an idea.. this thread was not started by me by the way..even Europeans have observed this phenomenon among south Asians muslims

  5. #55
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Online
    02-25-2021 @ 10:35 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    guess
    Ethnicity
    guess
    Country
    Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    60
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 33/5
    Given: 4/5

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jatt View Post
    ghorids and ghaznavids were not pashtoons they were turkiks. the only time pashtoons ever controlled indian part of Punjab was just one year which Sikhs wrestled back from them including many afghan controlled territories.
    Sounds like you need to open up a history book - if you can't you could even learn this stuff from wikipedia. The ghorids are contested to be either pashtun or tajik and I personally believe they were tajik. The ghaznavids were not completely turkic, mahmud of ghazni was half turkic half persian (nowadays tajik). The armies of these dynasties and several others were most definitely composed of pashtuns among other muslims at the time. And dude, seriously you need to learn history, even wikipedia would expand your knowledge to something more than whatever it is they tell you at the gurdwaras lol. Ghaznavids, delhi sultanates, durranis - these were all arguably pashtun engineered rule over parts of what is now pakistan and india - no matter the dynasty, pashtun or tajik (I'm both by the way) they ruled over parts of india for decades to centuries at a time. And yes, the sikhs were able to fight off pashtun aggression but let's be honest it was done with quite a bit of british help not to mention the durrani and ghilzai tribes were always infighting with one another at the time, sometimes even switching allegiances to the punjabi/british side to gain favor after the victory.

  6. #56
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Online
    02-25-2021 @ 10:35 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    guess
    Ethnicity
    guess
    Country
    Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    60
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 33/5
    Given: 4/5

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jatt View Post
    there are many Pakistani and pashtoon forums .. log onto them and you will get an idea.. this thread was not started by me by the way..even Europeans have observed this phenomenon among south Asians muslims
    go to pashtunforums and see what they think of arabs and pakis there lol

  7. #57
    Veteran Member jatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    12-03-2017 @ 12:49 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    jatt
    Ethnicity
    south asian
    Country
    India
    Gender
    Posts
    3,222
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1,427/264
    Given: 682/83

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scytsar View Post
    Sounds like you need to open up a history book - if you can't you could even learn this stuff from wikipedia. The ghorids are contested to be either pashtun or tajik and I personally believe they were tajik. The ghaznavids were not completely turkic, mahmud of ghazni was half turkic half persian (nowadays tajik). The armies of these dynasties and several others were most definitely composed of pashtuns among other muslims at the time. And dude, seriously you need to learn history, even wikipedia would expand your knowledge to something more than whatever it is they tell you at the gurdwaras lol. Ghaznavids, delhi sultanates, durranis - these were all arguably pashtun engineered rule over parts of what is now pakistan and india - no matter the dynasty, pashtun or tajik (I'm both by the way) they ruled over parts of india for decades to centuries at a time. And yes, the sikhs were able to fight off pashtun aggression but let's be honest it was done with quite a bit of british help not to mention the durrani and ghilzai tribes were always infighting with one another at the time, sometimes even switching allegiances to the punjabi/british side to gain favor after the victory.
    it seems you need to read history not me.. there were no british in Punjab at them times of Sikh misls and Sikh empire...actually half of Afghanistan is in Pakistan because british inherited the area from Sikh empire.. don't spread ignorance

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last Online
    12-17-2014 @ 09:34 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Iranic
    Ethnicity
    Afghan
    Ancestry
    Afghanistan
    Country
    England
    Taxonomy
    Alpine med
    Gender
    Posts
    1,856
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 521/45
    Given: 175/21

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truthbetold View Post
    Why do the Pashtuns (who form a significant amount of the Pakistani population and are the largest group in Afghanistan) have such an extreme amount of self hate regarding what they are?
    Historically, they are tied to South-Central Asia. Genetically, they're CLOSELY linked with other South Asian populations such as the Punjabi Jatts, Kashmiris, and Sindhi's. Geographically, most of them live in Pakistan. after that Afghanistan. Last time I checked Pakistan was South Asia, and Afghanistan lies both in South Asia and Central Asia.
    Pashtuns are clear cut South Asian people by genetics. They cluster with other Northwest South Asians. I was reading some comments on this forum, and once again I noted that there are Pashtuns who live in some bubble regarding this fact.
    They think that because they speak an Iranic language, they are somehow not related to their closest geographical and historical brothers; the Indic Pakistanis and Northwest Indians.
    This menace needs to stop. A Turkic speaking Turk from Turkey is closer genetically to a Semitic speaking Syrian, an Iranic speaking Kurd or Persian, than to a Turkic speaking Central Asian, by genetics. A Turkic speaking Azerbaijani is genetically much and much closer related to a Persian speaking Iranian, or a Kartvelian speaking Georgian, than to a Turkic speaking Uyghur. By the same logic, an Iranic speaking Pashtun is closer to an Indo-Aryan speaking Sindhi, Kashmiri, Himachali, and even up to including High Caste Hindu's from Central India, than to any West Asian group. Linguistics =/= genotype, the same way all people know and acknowledge that phenotype =/= genotype.

    Pashtuns don't just ''cluster'' somewhere loosely in South Asia, no they cluster firmly in South Asia genetically. Some South Asians just sound so self-haterish on the internet. For outsiders its very confusing and quite a hilarious scene. I assume the ''lightness'' factor plays a role as well considering what role it always has played in south asia. Would be the reason why Pashtuns (as they are so-called the lightest south asians, no?) find it so insulting to be compared to their darker but close genetic brothers, the Sindhi's, high caste Hindu Indians, Kashmiri's, etc.

    The haplogroup R1a (Y-DNA) is found at a frequency of 51.02% among the Pashtun people. Paragroup Q-M242 (xMEH2, xM378) (of Haplogroup Q-M242 (Y-DNA)) was found at 16.3% in Pashtuns.[89] Haplogroup Q-M242 is also found at a frequency of 18% in Pashtuns in the Afghan capital of Kabul.[90]

    According to a 2012 study:

    "MDS and Barrier analysis have identified a significant affinity between Pashtun, Tajik, North Indian, and West Indian populations, creating an Afghan-Indian population structure that excludes the Hazaras, Uzbeks, and the South Indian Dravidian speakers. In addition, gene flow to Afghanistan from India marked by Indian lineages, L-M20, H-M69, and R2a-M124, also seems to mostly involve Pashtuns and Tajiks. This genetic affinity and gene flow suggests interactions that could have existed since at least the establishment of the region's first civilizations at the Indus Valley and the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex."


    source: Haber M, Platt DE, Ashrafian Bonab M, Youhanna SC, Soria-Hernanz DF et al. (2012). "Afghanistan's Ethnic Groups Share a Y-Chromosomal Heritage Structured by Historical Events". PLoS ONE 7 (3): e34288. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034288. PMC 3314501. PMID 22470552.

    World plots/PCA's.












    As compared to West Asia/European/Eurasia plots











    Sure they're not the same as other South Asians etc in all aspects, but genetically, geographically and to a certain good extent phenotypically, they are firmly South Asian. Culturally however they received influence from wider regions.
    Pashtuns, like all other South Asian populations are very far from West Asians genetically, and even more further from Europeans. (Tbh, even hilarious to discuss all this)
    A Pashtun is genetically closer to Indians all the way up to South India, than he is towards a West Asian Georgian.

    A population hailing mostly from Pakistan (clear cut South Asia) and from Afghanistan (a nation in South Asia and Central Asia), that genetically cluster and overlap with peoples such as Punjabi Jatts, Baloch, Sindhi's, and high caste Hindu Indians, are just South Asian.

    "South Asian" doesn't equate Punjabi/Tamil/Sindhi etc. it's a wide diverse region. We're talking about genetics however. Genetically they overlap and cluster with other South Asians (or either Punjabi Jatts, Kashmiri, Himachali people are not South Asian anymore genetically?), geographically they are also mostly South Asian (worlds largest amount of Pashtuns live in South Asian Pakistan), so they are South Asians. Of course their language and culture differs somewhat from other close clustering South Asians (Punjabi Jatts, Kashmiri's etc), but did/does it change their genetics remotely significantly? No.

    Pashtuns, should embrace their closest genetic, historical, and cultural brothers, the Indic Pakistanis, and the Northwest Indians, and not be such self haters on the internet. It all doesn't change reality and neither does it bring anything to either peoples other than more chisms and hate in that already troubled region of the world.

    The cluster Map you've shown represents the pakistani pashtuns, they are significantly more South Asian than the afghan pashtuns. The afgghan pashtuns forms the gap berween the iranian cluster and Pathan cluster. Language wise yes, we speak a iranic language. Phenotypically we are iranid. Not North indid. There's no self hate.

  9. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Online
    02-25-2021 @ 10:35 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    guess
    Ethnicity
    guess
    Country
    Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    60
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 33/5
    Given: 4/5

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jatt View Post
    it seems you need to read history not me.. there were no british in Punjab at them times of Sikh misls and Sikh empire...actually half of Afghanistan is in Pakistan because british inherited the area from Sikh empire.. don't spread ignorance
    hahaahaha oh wow, seriously m8 open a book or wikipedia as I said so you can get real knowledge and not gurdwara knowledge. This is literally muslims studying in madrassas their entire lives tier.

  10. #60
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last Online
    12-17-2014 @ 09:34 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Iranic
    Ethnicity
    Afghan
    Ancestry
    Afghanistan
    Country
    England
    Taxonomy
    Alpine med
    Gender
    Posts
    1,856
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 521/45
    Given: 175/21

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Willem View Post
    Look at the genetic charts he posted. Pathans are almost the same as other Pakistani groups. They do not cluster with Iranians on regional PCA plots.
    That's because it shows the pakistani Pathans!! Their average South indian score on harappa world was around 30%!! For sfghsn pashtuns IT was 14%!!!!!!!!! The afghan pashtuns are much more west shifted

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 55
    Last Post: 03-27-2022, 11:52 PM
  2. South Asian Component In West Asian Populations
    By tamilgangster in forum Genetics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-21-2013, 07:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •