1






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,404/770 Given: 6,855/520 |
ok guys, lets set an end to this endless R1a indo-european or Turkic bs. I just say haplogroup P and Native American R + Q. Google and be quite.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,096/184 Given: 1,505/100 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,555/1,408 Given: 4,506/4,902 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,815/28 Given: 872/25 |
We have to agree that R1a was picked up and took part in expansion of Turkic people, although probably at least double % of of it was slaughtered as a result.
But any Z93 to some point in history spoke an indo-iranian language, that's beyond doubt to me. There are no genuinely Turkic branches of it aside from some very downstream clades.
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>Y35>CTS3402>Y33>CTS8816>Y2902>Y3226>YP5224>BY27800
N1c-L1026>CTS10760>VL29>Z4908>L550>L1025>M2783>Y5580>L591>BY158>Y5576
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>YP1019>YP1020>YP1033*
R1b-U152>L2>DF103>S14469
It's still not an end.
R1a and R1b unite - Join!




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,555/1,408 Given: 4,506/4,902 |
Only in the direction of the west, since no R1a exists in Japan or China. Before that, C was certainly the original haplogroup.Indeed, R1a is Satem Indo-European...
But any Z93 to some point in history spoke an indo-iranian language, that's beyond doubt to me. There are no genuinely Turkic branches of it aside from some very downstream clades.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 87/32 Given: 5/0 |
you wanna see my scyth tattoo?




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 87/32 Given: 5/0 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,404/770 Given: 6,855/520 |
edit
Last edited by Proto-Shaman; 01-13-2015 at 10:25 AM.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 87/32 Given: 5/0 |
i don't read what a guy with a chechnya flag says anyway






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,404/770 Given: 6,855/520 |
Guys, the Scytho-Iranic theory is an european dogma solely based on linguistic pseudo-science. If you still believe this myth (itself 100% refuted by genetics, anhtropology, ethnography etc)... it's up to you, I can only welcome you the the 21st century. The Indo-European culture is not a rival with the Turkic culture, their origins and histories are much interspersed, the protestations appearing in the posting are aimed solely at distortions and misrepresentations endemic to the Eurocentric offshoot of the science, and a full credit must be given to Eurocentrism for the studies that unwittingly advanced Turkology.
Coming to haplogroup C:
1. hp C is not limited to Altaics.
2. hp R is not limited to IE's.
3. Language groups share multiple hp's!
4. Altaic is not even an accepted family, and it never will.
5. The most ancient source of R1a1 haplotypes is provided by the people now living in northern China. It was shown (Bittles et al., 2007) that for a number of Chinese (Sino-Tibetan+Altaic) populations, such as Hui, Bonan, Dongxiang, Salars, a percentage of R1a1 haplotypes reached 18% - 32%.
6. The gene pool of the Turkic-speaking peoples of Siberia such as Altaians, Khakas, Shors and Soyots, living between the Altai and Lake Baikal along the Sayan mountains, are genetically closest to Amerindians. Sorry, but I can't detect any sign of IE except of this.
7. Turkic branch of hp P ! ... keep ignoring it...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks