0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 40,072 Given: 10,740 |
I wish it broke down the African also. Dominicans should, in which case, have a lot of Senegambian ancestry but I have no idea what Puerto Ricans would get.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,139 Given: 800 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,878 Given: 12,910 |
The results are wrong. Basque made up to 6-8% of the settlers in Mexico but are only 2.19% of the genetic contribution.
And Basque made up to 15-25% of the settlers in Northern Mexico. These states of Sinaloa,Durango,Zacatecas,Sonora made the states of Nueva Vizcaya. 1.43% British in Mexicans is a lie. Americans nor British settled in Mexico ,maybe 10,000 .
Their is American retirees but they don't have families in Mexico.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,206 Given: 792 |
The Basque contribution is 2.19% of the total genome, which means that it it is 4.59% of the European contribution. That number is pretty consistent with 6-8% of the European immigrants to Mexico being Basque. I also think, like Sikeliot said, that the British scores could reflect Northern Spanish and Basque ancestry because of the ancient connections between those two groups.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,878 Given: 12,910 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,878 Given: 12,910 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 576 Given: 579 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,878 Given: 12,910 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,878 Given: 12,910 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks