Post your Indo-European score?

[dddcc]

Yamnaya was 50% EHG, which means it cannot be modelled as a mixture of modern populations who barely score above 10%. Is it really THAT difficult to understand?

This thread is hilarious. You cannot estimate the Yamnaya/Indo-European input by combining all these components.

This thread is about Indo-European score not Yamnaya score.
Yamnaya did not appear ex nihilo and do descend from earlier pre-proto-indo-european speaking cultures associated with populations rich in EHG-SHG-WHG that gradually supplanted supposedly Basque-like languages speaking Neolithic Europeans.
The keyword is that the genetic distance between EHG-SHG-WHG and CHG are very small and that means that they all descend from the same common ancient preproto-indoeuropean speaking population; rich in R1a and R1b Y-DNA.

[Rethel]

This thread is about Indo-European score not Yamnaya score

But it is hard to called such mishmash "indoeuropean".

PIE society was based on patrilinearity, not race.
Main population was based on Corded types plus
uralian, baltid and med minority types plus on the
borders some amerindian, alpine and mongoloidic
types with additional caucasian female's appendix.

[Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin]

CHG_EEF 14.55
SHG_WHG 5.22
EHG 4.98
IRAN_NEOLITHIC 4.81

=30.56

[noricum]

78.58%

1 CHG_EEF 44.53
2 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 14.76
3 SHG_WHG 14.60
4 EHG 14.47
5 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 4.98
6 NATUFIAN 3.97
7 SIBERIAN 1.29

[Henbane]

79.87%

1 CHG_EEF 43.74
2 EHG 19.33
3 SHG_WHG 15.06
4 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 12.53
5 NATUFIAN 4.74
6 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 1.78
7 KARITIANA 1.52
8 POLAR 1.17
9 PAPUAN 0.13

[War Chef]

73.5%

[Dick]

74.23%

[FunkyWanderer]

72.5%



Near East Neolithic K13 Oracle results:

gedrosia K13 Oracle

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 CHG_EEF 39.11
2 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 16.48
3 SHG_WHG 14.73
4 EHG 13.87
5 NATUFIAN 7.64
6 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 4.79
7 POLAR 1.26
8 PAPUAN 1.14
9 KARITIANA 0.63
10 SUB_SAHARAN 0.36

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Romanian 6.43
2 French 7.01
3 Bulgarian 7.32
4 Croatian 7.4
5 Hungarian 8.31
6 English 11.28

[ALL]

Earliest R1a are found in Mesolithic Karelia and Zhizhitskaya of later neolithic on border of Belarus and Russia. On the other hand Yamanya has been test for R1b only. We should embrace our Uralic heritage.

Not so fast my Belarusian friend, you score higher than me 87.45%, but not my R1b-Z2103 ancestor from Kalmykia Temerta IV
My score from Silesia-R1b-Z2103
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 CHG_EEF 42.04
2 SHG_WHG 17.5
3 EHG 17.39
4 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 12.07
5 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 5.06
6 ANCESTRAL_INDIAN 3.27
7 NATUFIAN 1.43
8 SIBERIAN 1.2
9 POLAR 0.05

81.99%


My paternal ancestor R1b-Z2103 Kalmykia
Kit F999968
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 EHG 91.64
2 CHG_EEF 6.82
3 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 1.03
4 SHG_WHG 0.41
5 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 0.09

91.64%

[Rugevit]

My paternal ancestor R1b-Z2103 Kalmykia
Kit F999968
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 EHG 91.64
2 CHG_EEF 6.82
3 IRAN_NEOLITHIC 1.03
4 SHG_WHG 0.41
5 ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC 0.09

91.64%

Can you find the score for a sample from north-eastern Poland next to Lithuania? I don't know the kit number.