0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,848/2,867 Given: 2,738/196 |
Scholarios, how many serious historians in the world take seriously the genetic results in their studies?
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,392/1,591 Given: 6,153/525 |
I don't have any I2a1 among my 1250 relatives. Any other name for this?
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,848/2,867 Given: 2,738/196 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,952/232 Given: 6,992/391 |
0% I2a1b among my DNA relatives, which is why I plot like a civilized ancient beast.
![]()
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,392/1,591 Given: 6,153/525 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,327/357 Given: 2,971/609 |
For Tosks, maybe you are right. (though the Arbereshe studies show a lot of I2 and R1a) On Northern Greece, Battaglia did, and I think some others. It seems to me that Northern Greeks are strangely the most tested. I think Catgeorge posted those here very recently.
And it isn't just that. Look at the Greek family dna projects, this clade is found a lot there. Even if it is unorganized, it seems obvious to me. Probably some of it was even brought by Arvanites![]()
書堂개 삼 년에 풍월 읊는다
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 697/3 Given: 812/31 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks