Peterski's DNA Tribes Report FTDNA raw data transfer

**~~Rethel~~** · 06-19-2017, 07:04 PM

Originally Posted by Magnolia

Because these tests habe no value.

For this you gain plus.

p.s. Even your rejected germanness showed up here, little german sister

**Peterski** · 06-20-2017, 01:34 AM

I asked them about my results, they replied, I suggested that they should add Sorbs:

http://i.imgur.com/O5FrDHZ.png

**Kriptc06** · 06-20-2017, 01:38 AM

3.3 MENA
1.9 South Asian
0.5 Siberia
0.2 SSA
0.1 Andid

whaat?

**~~Rethel~~** · 06-20-2017, 08:49 AM

Originally Posted by Litvin

I asked them about my results, they replied, I suggested that they should add Sorbs:

Yahoo is now specizlized in genetics?

**Peterski** · 06-20-2017, 10:09 AM

This part of my DNA Tribes report is very similar to my FTDNA/MyHeritage/DNA.Land/GenePlaza results (in these tests I usually get between 75% and 55% North-East European, between 24% and 36% North-West European, and the rest is South European - both South-East and South-West):

By the way, here are their reference populations:

http://dnatribes.com/populations.php

http://dnatribes.com/pops-eur.php

http://dnatribes.com/sample-results/...y-july2013.pdf

Here is the list of their Polish samples:

Central Poland (500)
Lodz, Poland (207)
Lodz, Poland (1000)
North Poland (100)
Northeast Poland (320)
North and Central Poland (412)
Podlasie (NE Poland) (413)
Poland (870)
Poland (2,041)
Poland (Bialystok) (208)
Poland (Gdansk) (293)
Poland (Krakow) (285)
Poland (Lublin) (204)
Poland (Pomerania Kujawy) (306)
Poland (Poznan) (301)
Poland (Szczecin) (306)
Poland (Warszawa) (236)
Poland (Wroclaw) (208)
Polish (202)
Pomerania-Kujawy, Northern Poland (205)
Pomorze Zachodnie, Northwest Poland (600)
South Poland (253)
Southern Poland (154)
Southeast Poland (203)
Upper Silesia, Poland (1139)
Western Poland (668)
Old Believers (Suwalki, Poland) (136)
Tatar (Poland) (168)

**Slavic Italian** · 11-23-2018, 09:49 AM

Originally Posted by Noman

Dude, there is no point of wasting money. The Key is your Raw DNA data. In fact, the population labels aren't to be taken literally. They are the representative of an underlying population structure, and not models of the real populations that contributed to your own ancestry.

These tests are getting better and better especially with these younger genealogists like Luckas and others who are taking it to a different level. The key is also looking at your DNA matches especially as an American. It's even more significant if your matches have four grandparents from the same ethnicity. They are also solving decades old murders and crimes with this data. So it is legit even if not perfect.