-1






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |
Yes of course I agree. But all 93 mummies tested in Shuenemann et al.? Also, what about the Gedmatch ancient Egyptian scores? Just coincidence that every Gedmatch and every Shuenemann sample gave the same result? Every last one is a Greco-Roman? And not like this Old Kingdom mummy:
![]()





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,035/73 Given: 1,735/67 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks