0
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 45/0 Given: 4/0 |
I wasn't trying to strenghten his argument but to help you understand your results. Regarding the closeness between the North European and West Asian components it's just a pattern that I've been seeing in every single run.
From "how to create zombies"
"K=12 for selected participants"
"K=11 for selected participants"
Or even the basic Dodecad V1
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 45,313/3,823 Given: 45,317/2,109 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 45,313/3,823 Given: 45,317/2,109 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 45,313/3,823 Given: 45,317/2,109 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,988/91 Given: 1,081/117 |
Ok, let's imagine now for a moment that West-Asian is European. That would mean, doing a (West Euro + East Euro + West Asia + Med) score that :
- Georgians more european than Germans, British, French, Dutch, Scandinavians, Irish, Hungarians, Finnish, etc.
But, oh !, surpisingly Georgians they don't even cluster with europeans on genetic PCA plots, they cluster with Turks, Iranians, Armenians,etc :
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 45,313/3,823 Given: 45,317/2,109 |
How does this logic work? I don't see the implication.
They are still closely related to Europeans on this plot. For example, Georgians seem as far away to Spaniards as Spaniards are away from Russians.But, oh !, surpisingly Georgians they don't even cluster with europeans on genetic PCA plots, they cluster with Turks, Iranians, Armenians,etc :
Help support Apricity by making a donation
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks