0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,315/907 Given: 71/59 |
You're telling me to watch cartoon network ?
I've read the links and found no data on their anthropological type
" In summary, we successfully defined a Y-chromosomal profile of King Béla III, which can serve as a reference for the identification of further remains and disputed living descendants of the Árpád Dynasty. [um]Among the examined skeletons, we discovered an Árpád member, whose exact affiliation, however, has not yet been established [u]. "
We all know don't know what type of R1a they have.
" There were three R1a and two R1b statistically predicted Y haplogroups among the male skeletons (Table 3). These are the most frequent and second most frequent haplogroups (25.6 and 18.1% respectively) in the present Hungarian population (Völgyi et al. 2009). King Béla III was inferred to belong to haplogroup R1a. The R1a Y haplogroup relates paternally to more than 10% of men in a wide geographic area from South Asia to Central Eastern Europe and South Siberia (Underhill et al. 2010). It is the most frequent haplogroup in various populations speaking Slavic, Indo-Iranian, Dravidian, Turkic and Finno-Ugric languages (Underhill et al. 2010). "




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,347/56 Given: 4,463/0 |
Oh? Cannot spend 10 minutes watching something that gives context to the out of context source you quoted from 1943? Are you an expert on our adventures pre-settlement? Something tells me no, which is why you will enjoy the history and story.
I've read it, yes. We are all waiting for the downstream. The fact it is R1 is intriguing in and of itself. The R1b branches will be nice to learn too.I've read the links and found no data on their anthropological type
" In summary, we successfully defined a Y-chromosomal profile of King Béla III, which can serve as a reference for the identification of further remains and disputed living descendants of the Árpád Dynasty. [um]Among the examined skeletons, we discovered an Árpád member, whose exact affiliation, however, has not yet been established [u]. "
We all know don't know what type of R1a they have.
" There were three R1a and two R1b statistically predicted Y haplogroups among the male skeletons (Table 3). These are the most frequent and second most frequent haplogroups (25.6 and 18.1% respectively) in the present Hungarian population (Völgyi et al. 2009). King Béla III was inferred to belong to haplogroup R1a. The R1a Y haplogroup relates paternally to more than 10% of men in a wide geographic area from South Asia to Central Eastern Europe and South Siberia (Underhill et al. 2010). It is the most frequent haplogroup in various populations speaking Slavic, Indo-Iranian, Dravidian, Turkic and Finno-Ugric languages (Underhill et al. 2010). "
Now enjoy your Hungarian lesson. You will better appreciate your context when watching it.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,603/953 Given: 409/684 |
Where is the debate? Only the origin of their name and status debated scientifically today. From a Turkic tribal name (skl or eszkil, for example Róna-Tas) or from the Hungarian administrative organization (szék). From a subjugated border guard elements or they were free warriors (várjobbágy) in the 10-11th century. Their ethnicization or the ethnicization of their absolute majority is not a debate anymor: they were ethnic magyars since the beginnings (Hungarian conquest), beacause there are evidences onto this only.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,347/56 Given: 4,463/0 |
You stated it already: if they were subjugated border guard elements what were they subjugated from? I never said once they are not Magyars. My mother's family is of this ancestry. The Turkic tribal name is important to our own Turkic identity and components as Magyars as a whole.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,315/907 Given: 71/59 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,347/56 Given: 4,463/0 |
Haha, now I am tempted to say you are being a troll. The video displays just what you were so mistaken about. Ironically it does so using medieval miniatures. Here I thought you'd appreciate that given your out of context quote.
At 5:00 specifically is your explanation of the "small Hungarians" in the David and Goliath sense, while throughout the video you see the "smallness" of the way they are treated and seen. It is visual. You will understand your poor context then.
If you can't give it a few minutes of your time then how can we have a discussion on it?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,603/953 Given: 409/684 |
From the free status! There were dozens of various tribal origin groups on this task, maybe a social origin caste was one of them. The székely name is similar origin than the tolmács word (from the Pecheneg talmács/tulmátzoi tribal name) in this case.
But the social origin caste in the service of the royal administration is the probable option in this case.
The Turkic tribal name is only baseless speculation based on the similarity between the two names. Grammatically works (Róna-Tas), but the Hungarian administrative division name: szék was much more better option.I never said once they are not Magyars. My mother's family is of this ancestry. The Turkic tribal name is important to our own Turkic identity and components as Magyars as a whole.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,315/907 Given: 71/59 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 10,234/328 Given: 3,580/69 |
Last edited by Marmara; 02-19-2018 at 01:48 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks