Why women of colour are trying to get out of the United States

[Latinus]

Anitta boyfriend Thiago Magalhães is hot. None of you guys will ever look better than him.

I'm better looking than him.

[Demon Revival]

Two things:
* Anitta has a poor/favelada face. She isn't any model of beauty/aesthethics.

The girl it posted had OK facial features.

* Mexico, not the US, is the fattest country in the world. And posting fat Americans doesn't prove anything. There are many fat people there, but also many skinny and good bodies. And the average American is still, because of it's way higher white population, better looking than the average Brazilian.

USA is way, way, way fatter than Mexico. Around 16 places higher or more:


And there are plenty of countries fatter than either of them.

[Demon Revival]

Latin America is the most white supremacist place in the world, where white own most of the capital and political power. They are also considered the most beautiful and such. Of course, things go to pot when they're kicked out. See Venezuela.

Yes, because latin america founded the KKK to hunt freed slaves, and made a Jim Crow institution to keep them segregated, and systematically fuel the prison industry using black people even today. Right?

Also, in Latin America, when all other conditions are similar, the whiter the population is, the more violent crime it has:
Chile vs. Argentina
Northern Mexico vs. Southern Mexico
Paraguay vs. Ecuador
Uruguay vs. Argentina
South and Southeastern Brazil vs. Northern Brazil

etc etc...

[Heather Duval]

I think the documentary suits you better.

Nope. Youre the only here who complains a lot about Brazil and thinks USA is better. Leave this country with your inferioority complex.

[Latinus]

The girl it posted had OK facial features.

USA is way, way, way fatter than Mexico. Around 16 places higher or more:


And there are plenty of countries fatter than either of them.

Nope. She is ugly:


Mexico has surpassed the US some years and have become the fattest country.

[Demon Revival]

Nope. She is ugly:

I've seen plenty of Brazilians that look far worse.

Mexico has surpassed the US some years and have become the fattest country.

No it hasn't. It's fucking 16 places away mate. The data is from late 2016 so there couldn't have been great changes up to now (early 2018). And USA has never been the fattest country in the world either. Even surpassing USA would not make Mexico the fattest country. It would merely make it the 12th. But right now it is the 28th.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ody_mass_index

Either way, none is particularly a top contender for the fattest country. The ones holding these titles are all Polynesian or Gulf Arab nations.

[Heather Duval]

I'm better looking than him.

[Latinus]

You have never seen my pictures, lol.

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

Black women suffered the most from sexist in the colony of America. They were raped and forced to shut up.

Actually, there is no evidence that rape was rampant against slave women. The roughly 14%-something average Caucasian ancestry that exists among African-Americans was mostly post-slavery. It seems counter intuitive but you have to understand that in a society where women who have sex outside of marriage are seen as whores White women hold close to their virginity for marriage and the men get their sex by crossing the tracks to the other side of town where Blacks had limited economic opportunities and so they were more willing to offer sex. With sex occasionally comes children.

I've explained this to you before and told you about Genovese (now deceased) who was the go to guy on the subject of slavery in the US south but you prefer your nonsense.

[Heather Duval]

Actually, there is no evidence that rape was rampant against slave women. The roughly 14%-something average Caucasian ancestry that exists among African-Americans was mostly post-slavery. It seems counter intuitive but you have to understand that in a society where women who have sex outside of marriage are seen as whores White women hold close to their virginity for marriage and the men get their sex by crossing the tracks to the other side of town where Blacks had limited economic opportunities and so they were more willing to offer sex. With sex occasionally comes children.

I've explained this to you before and told you about Genovese (now deceased) who was the go to guy on the subject of slavery in the US south but you prefer your nonsense.

Slavery in the United States encompassed wide-ranging rape and sexual abuse.[2] Many slaves fought back against sexual attacks, and some died resisting them; others were left with psychological and physical scars.[51] "Soul murder, the feeling of anger, depression and low self-esteem" is how historian Nell Irvin Painter describes the effects of this abuse, linking it to slavery. Slaves regularly suppressed anger before their masters to avoid showing weakness.

Harriet Jacobs said in her narrative that she believed her mistress was jealous of her master's sexual interest in her, the reason she did not try to protect her. Victims of abuse during slavery may have blamed themselves for the incidents, due to their isolation.

Rape laws in the south embodied a race-based double standard. Black men accused of rape during the colonial period were often punished with castration, and the penalty was increased to death during the antebellum period;[52] however, white men could rape female slaves without fear of punishment.[52] Men and boys were also sexually abused by slaveholders.[53] Thomas Foster says that although historians have begun to cover sexual abuse during slavery, few focus on sexual abuse of men and boys because of the assumption that only enslaved women were victimized. Foster suggests that men and boys may have also been forced into unwanted sexual activity; one problem in documenting such abuse is that they, of course, did not bear mixed-race children.[54] Both masters and mistresses were thought to have abused male slaves.[55]

Angela Davis contends that the systematic rape of female slaves is analogous to the medieval concept of droit du seigneur, believing that the rapes were a deliberate effort by slaveholders to extinguish resistance in women and reduce them to the status of animals.[56]

The sexual abuse of slaves was partially rooted in a patriarchal southern culture which treated all women, black and white, as property.[2] Although southern mores regarded white women as dependent and submissive, black women were often consigned to a life of sexual exploitation.[2] Racial purity was the driving force behind the southern culture's prohibition of sexual relations between white women and black men; however, the same culture protected sexual relations between white men and black women. The result was a number of mixed-race (mulatto) offspring.[57] Many women were raped, and had little control over their families. Children, free women, indentured servants and men were not immune from abuse by masters and owners. Nell Irvin Painter also explains that the psychological outcome of such treatment often had the same results ("soul murder"). Children (especially young girls) were often subjected to sexual abuse by their masters, their masters' children and relatives.[58] Similarly, indentured servants and slave women were often abused. Since these women had no control over where they went or what they did, their masters could manipulate them into situations of high risk (for instance, forcing them into a dark field or making them sleep in their master's bedroom to be available for service).[59] Free (or white) women could charge their perpetrators with rape, but slave women had no legal recourse; their bodies legally belonged to their owners.[60] This record has also given historians the opportunity to explore sexual abuse during slavery in populations other than enslaved women.

In 1662 the southern colonies adopted into law the principle of partus sequitur ventrem, by which the children of slave women took the status of their mothers (regardless of paternity). This was a departure from English common law, which held that children took the status of their father. Some fathers freed their children, but many did not. The law relieved men of responsibility to support their children, and restricted the open secret of miscegenation to the slave quarters. However, Europeans and other visitors to the south noted the number of mixed-race slaves. During the 19th century Mary Chesnut and Fanny Kemble, whose husbands were planters, chronicled the disgrace of white men taking sexual advantage of slave women.