VLATKO VUKOVIC's autosomal!

**~~Stears~~** · 03-07-2018, 08:36 PM

Originally Posted by Vlatko Vukovic

If Scandinavian is Nordic looking man, and carrier of R1a, he is a descedant of Indo-European. It's not important with who he mixed, he is descedant of proto-Indo European, and that's reallity.

Original proto IE speaker people looked like that, IE is an Asian origin language:

Just some Hard-facts: Finno-Ugric language group was born in N-Eastern Europe (in the Elbe- Baltic Sea - URal region), until the roots of ancient IE language groups go back to Asian continent (Anatolia). In the Eurasian supercontinent, there are more native speakers of IE languages in the ASIAN continent than in Europen continent. (Just remember the large IE speaking populations of India Pakistan Iran)
However, the 97% of Finno-ugric speaking people live in Europe. Therefore to call finno-ugric languages as "asian languages" is laughable illogical, unscientific and misleading.

TYPE IN ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA:"Proto Indo Europeans"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans

and see the maps about original ancient IE people!France Britain Italy haven't significant proto indo-European genes.The Germanic people have also very very low ratio of ancient IE haplogroup markers (R1a),only Eastern Europeans have high ratio of original proto IE haplogroups markers in Europe. Western European languages belongs to IE language group,but in very very distant way.(Have you ever heard about language-shift? The IE linguistic effect spreaded as a lingua franca and as a „dealer language” between many many populations during thousands of years) The real genetic IE people equal with indians and iranians in the Asian continent. Therefore being real descendants of proto Indo-Europeans represent lower culture, technology & lower scientific and economic development in the Eurasian continent.

**Vlatko Vukovic** · 03-07-2018, 08:38 PM

Originally Posted by Stears

IE is an Asian origin language:

It's incorrect.

**Leto** · 03-07-2018, 08:41 PM

Originally Posted by Stears

No, Spain and Italy are southern European countries, but they belong to the Western Civilization. German speaking countries and Western Christian Slavs are Central European countries, but they belong to the Western Civilization.

Religion shaped not only religious life, but different civilizations.

Okay, but what does it have to do with GENETICS? Even ethnic Russians are not Asian, we're still over 90% West Eurasian genetically, even Northern Russians. I could show you my mom's family, she is Northern Russian. Of course, the East Eurasian influence is more noticeable in Russia than in, say, Poland, that's totally understandable, but for example Belarus is much less influenced (below 5%). That's why I identify more with Belarus, because I personally don't feel close to Siberian and Islamic peoples of Russia.
Europe is not only Germany or France, it normally extends to the European part of Russia geographically.

**~~Maintenance~~** · 03-07-2018, 08:41 PM

Originally Posted by Stears

Original proto-indo-europeans were not even white people. Do you feel proud to adopt the language of the traditional brown race (proto IE)?

You are yellow not white.

Also you said i would plot near lebanon before, viriato made this for me today.

**Leto** · 03-07-2018, 08:43 PM

Originally Posted by Vlatko Vukovic

According to this map, Niger is the same cultural group and historical as Albanians and Bosniaks are.

Lol. They confuse religion with geography. Orthodox, Islamic, Buddhist, but why not Catholic and Protestant?

**Vlatko Vukovic** · 03-07-2018, 08:48 PM

Originally Posted by Stears

Original proto IE speaker people looked like that, IE is an Asian origin language:

Just some Hard-facts: Finno-Ugric language group was born in N-Eastern Europe (in the Elbe- Baltic Sea - URal region), until the roots of ancient IE language groups go back to Asian continent (Anatolia). In the Eurasian supercontinent, there are more native speakers of IE languages in the ASIAN continent than in Europen continent. (Just remember the large IE speaking populations of India Pakistan Iran)
However, the 97% of Finno-ugric speaking people live in Europe. Therefore to call finno-ugric languages as "asian languages" is laughable illogical, unscientific and misleading.

TYPE IN ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA:"Proto Indo Europeans"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans

and see the maps about original ancient IE people!France Britain Italy haven't significant proto indo-European genes.The Germanic people have also very very low ratio of ancient IE haplogroup markers (R1a),only Eastern Europeans have high ratio of original proto IE haplogroups markers in Europe. Western European languages belongs to IE language group,but in very very distant way.(Have you ever heard about language-shift? The IE linguistic effect spreaded as a lingua franca and as a „dealer language” between many many populations during thousands of years) The real genetic IE people equal with indians and iranians in the Asian continent. Therefore being real descendants of proto Indo-Europeans represent lower culture, technology & lower scientific and economic development in the Eurasian continent.

This man is Dravidian looking. About Finno-Ugric languages, they originated from Ural, and Ural was settled by Mongoloids in ancient time. Still today we can see this traits among Finnish people. Hungarians are heavily mixed with other their caucasoid neighbours, and their asiatic looking is now rare. But their Finno-Ugric relatives, who stayed in Ural today are totally Mongoloid people, also with highest Finno-Ugric genetical purity.