0



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2/0 Given: 0/0 |

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 12/3 Given: 0/0 |
Thanks a lot Humanophage, and Sahson too. Yes, it all makes sense. It was indeed the Romanian result in particular I was wondering about. Then again all these results by country tend to vary quite a bit depending on the run in question so you can get all kinds of hits. I love how overwhelming the "Finnic" element is in this one haha.![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 45/0 Given: 4/0 |
Once again the absence of MENA components might be skewing the results for Southern Euros...
PT1
West European (Peaks in the Pyrenees) : 52.20%
South European ( Peaks in Calabria and Greece) : 28.46%
North European ( Peaks in the north sea shores) : 15.20%
Northwest European (Peaks in Ireland and Cornwall) : 2.56%
East European ( Peaks in North Russia) : 1.56%


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 15/1 Given: 0/0 |
Eurogenes EU9d results:
North European: 0.332533
Northwest European: 0.323281
South European: 0.190074
Baltic: 0.114494
West European: 0.039578
East European: 0.00001
North Asian: 0.0001
East Asian: 0.00001
Sub-Saharan African: 0.00001
Compared to other populations:
New World:
U.S. 12.43
Canada 15.6
Australia 17.89
Old World:
Germany 14.65
Austria 15.65
Switzerland 19.05
Kent 19.85
France 20.1

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13/1 Given: 0/0 |
I just realised that Davids latest run is really quiet interesting.
"Northern European"
"North Atlantic"
"Balto-Slavic"
Had no nerves to do the other ones yet.
EDIT: Almost forgot to warn you: The Slavic value of the Belgians... is wrong (forgot to change it). Just ignore it![]()
Last edited by Frederick; 09-05-2011 at 03:54 AM. Reason: More info
Bring back the stocks!
Actually, Davids post about his latest run is now removed from Eurogenes blog. Seems like he wasn't too pleased with it himself - I wonder why would that be?
What's curious, is how you chose the ranges of percentage that decides where to draw those lines.
For Germanic blood connection it's - 22%
Celtic blood connection - 28%
For Balto-Slavic blood connection it's more than twice that of the Germanic range - 51%

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13/1 Given: 0/0 |
What are ou talking about?
Its still there?:
http://bga101.blogspot.com/2011/07/g...europe_20.html
I chosed it like this: 30% and up = inside, 29 and lower = outsideWhat's curious, is how you chose the ranges of percentage that decides where to draw those lines.
For Germanic blood connection it's - 22%
Celtic blood connection - 28%
For Balto-Slavic blood connection it's more than twice that of the Germanic range - 51%
That was the rule for Germanic, Celtic and Slavic alike.
The boundary is just there to increase the impression, that the highest percentage regions indeed somewhat resemble the historical core regions of these people. Its not meant to "exclude" some one.
But including the Balkan and Finland into the Germanic boundary just wouldnt have suited my point.
EDIT:
Well, your right, its not the latest run but from "Wednesday, July 20, 2011"
Anyways. I made the maps from that run, not from the latest then.
Its still good (on nation averages level), dont know for individual level (this problem between that GErmanic and Celtic element beeing quiet noisy for individuals because both elements are extemely similiar)
Last edited by Frederick; 09-05-2011 at 03:05 PM.
Bring back the stocks!


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13/1 Given: 0/0 |
That map has a huge overlap of Germany, Lower Countries, Kent and an undefined part of France.
I guess Johnston can keep his dream of West-Germanic unity.
![]()
Bring back the stocks!



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 11/1 Given: 0/0 |
I can't find myself on that map.![]()
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks