0





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 47,252/3,835 Given: 47,058/2,146 |
Me:
72.85% Atlantic-Baltic
23.05% Near-East
1.82% Far-East
2.28% Africa
Help support Apricity by making a donation


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |
My numbers from that African calculator:
72.09% Europe
8.36% NW_Africa
18.36% SW_Asia
0.00% E_Africa
0.00% S_Africa
0.01% Mbuti
0.00% W_Africa
0.98% Biaka
0.20% San



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 36/3 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 437/31 Given: 0/0 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 47,252/3,835 Given: 47,058/2,146 |
2% is not that much considering my family has been in South Africa for around 350 years, 13 generations. Some admixture took place in the first 50 years of early settlement and was exaggerated through a bottleneck effect (founder effect) - which means I could have a single African ancestor through several lines of my family.
Help support Apricity by making a donation


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9/0 Given: 0/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 227/7 Given: 118/2 |
???
Did you post the wrong pics? That has nothing to do with Siberian influence.
EDIT: Here's the low-down from them professional geneticists:
CHB + JPT = Chinese from Beijing + Japanese from Tokyo


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 227/7 Given: 118/2 |
Yes. The pics are PCA plots with a few populations. The link shows an IBS comparison with Vologda Russians, with East Finns being the closest. Nothing about Siberian affinity.
The Vologda Russians have greater similarity with East Eurasian populations than Finns, which is what we usually see.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks