0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 265/17 Given: 11/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 367/27 Given: 11/1 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 265/17 Given: 11/0 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 317/33 Given: 251/34 |
They absolutely are.
undecisive man


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 265/17 Given: 11/0 |
Can you speek Kazakh?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 265/17 Given: 11/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 367/27 Given: 11/1 |
I'm not Mongolian. I base my opinion on analyses of languages, their grammar, their sound, haplogroup distributions.
For example, Kazakh language is specific and distinct because of its harsh guttural K sound. Such sounds is present only in Eastern Eurasian languages which correlate with migration of haplogroup Q ( in Ket, Chukchi, Eskimo languages). Sure its not only this one sound. The general sound of these languages is similar also.
Chukchi language sounds closer to Kazakh than Mongolian.
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 367/27 Given: 11/1 |
Ket language ( haplogroup Q) also sounds like Kazakh.
Photos of Ket people in this video are misleading because modern Ket people are mixed with Russians.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 265/17 Given: 11/0 |
I hope you understand that your theory falls under the definition "in my opinion", "it's seems to me" and etc. and has no relation with real scince?
But, as i undestand,you are kazakh, but you cant speek Kazakh?





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 15,697/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks