Ford's (Bosnian Serb) autosomal results

[ixulescu]

Ydna clustering is odd. There’s a lot of people that wouldn’t even cluster to their respective ethnicities

Clusterings are bad with both ydna and adna, for different reasons.
YDNA clades are solid though.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Ydna clustering is odd. There’s a lot of people that wouldn’t even cluster to their respective ethnicities

His countryman Daco Roman would cluster with Kosovo on tha map lmao, just because he is E-V13, even though his Romanian side is for sure different from Albanians.

[ixulescu]

His countryman Daco Roman would cluster with Kosovo on tha map lmao, just because he is E-V13, even though his Romanian side is for sure different from Albanians.

Then you go deeper in the tree, until it branches out.
There nothing more solid in ancestry than YDNA clades. No guesswork there.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Then you go deeper in the tree, until it branches out.
There nothing more solid in ancestry than YDNA clades. No guesswork there.

Looks like you're coping with the fact Romanians and Moldovans are genetically different people.

[Dick]

I believe it will be the same as we get more data and genealogical info, it's possible on Balkans as most people still know their tribe/clan allegation.

Not in my case. I don’t belong to any clan but I kinda knew this before I did a ydna test

[ixulescu]

Looks like you're coping with the fact Romanians and Moldovans are genetically different people.

Any subgroup of one ethnicity is somewhat different from another, what are you talking about?

Btw, the PLOS One paper I talked about earlier, found no significant differences between Romanians and Moldovans. But also no significant differences between Romanians and Moldovans (grouped together) and Balkanites, and no significant difference between Moldovans and East Slavs living nearby Moldova

All these local differences are small, whether some like it or not.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Any subgroup of one ethnicity is somewhat different from another, what are you talking about?

Btw, the PLOS One paper I talked about earlier, found no significant differences between Romanians and Moldovans. But also no significant differences between Romanians and Moldovans (grouped together) and Balkanites, and no significant difference between Moldovans and East Slavs living nearby Moldova

All these local differences are small, whether some like it or not.

ydna is irrelevant, keep trolling dude. there's big gap between Romania and Moldova on PCA charts, average Bosnian is closer to Moldovans than Wallachians are. You're just trying to distort the facts to fit your agenda.

[ixulescu]

ydna is irrelevant, keep trolling dude. there's big gap between Romania and Moldova on PCA charts, average Bosnian is closer to Moldovans than Wallachians are. You're just trying to distort the facts to fit your agenda.

Why is ydna irrelevant for studying ancestry?
Can you formulate an intelligent argument?

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Why is ydna irrelevant for studying ancestry?
Can you formulate an intelligent argument?

It shows only your direct male ancestor and nothing else, dumbass. American nigger with slave owner ydna will cluster with Brits on Ydna charts lmao. On autosomal that will never happen because it covers entire genome.

[ixulescu]

It shows only your direct male ancestor and nothing else, dumbass. American nigger with slave owner ydna will cluster with Brits on Ydna charts lmao. On autosomal that will never happen because it covers entire genome.

Of course, that's the meaning of patrilineal ancestry. It can actually point to an European male ancestor.
adna won't necessarily be able to do that. adna only quantifies the allele distribution in a population. Similar allele frequencies can result without crossing ancestry lines.