My true ancestry.com

[Ayetooey]

Wrong. R1a M458 exist in Serbs, Tesla had it. It is true however you have not much genetic continuity with them.

It isn't disputed White Serbs came from East Germany where Dervan's Serbia was located, whoever denies that has agenda. And that Sorbs (Lužički Srbi) are their descendants.

So look at proto-Serb genetics among them.

R1a M458 is low in Serbs; the connection between Serbs and Sorbs isn't taught at any university in the world, it's an internet theory and about as reliable as the idea that Hrvat comes from Iranic tribes

"Common theories from the 20th century derive it from an Iranian origin,[8] the root word being a third-century Scytho-Sarmatian form attested in the Tanais Tablets as Χοροάθος (Khoroáthos, alternate forms comprise Khoróatos and Khoroúathos)"

Even if "proto Serbs" came from Sorbs, it's meaningless for two reasons. 1: We're assuming the modern day Sorbs are identical to proto Sorbs/Serbs 1500 years ago. 2: We're assuming they came in any great number; in the vast majority of historical sources only the "Sclaveni" are mentioned, any "proto Sorbs" likely only passed on the name to whatever Sclaveni they mixed with. Same with the Iranic Hrvats, the Magyars, the Bulgars etc.

[Bosniensis]

You are boring with your Vlachic propaganda.

Vlachs are not Romans, they are East Romance speakers. Vlachs were created as mix of many people which were present in Balkans in the last few thousands years including Slavs.

If All Serbs are Half Roman, Half Scythian like CommonSense, Me etc... from which haplogroup 100% Greek/Roman admixture came?

Or do you still believe that I2a1b and R1a were 100% Slavic (Scythian) then they mixed with Greeks/Romans later?

Don't be ridiculous.

Illyrians, Thracians live among us, in fact that's what WE are, we just speak Slavic tongue (which is mix of paleo-balkan + scythian language)

[talombo]

What's the difference between the blue dots and the red ones ?

[Gründig]

It is interesting that my no 1 match is the Celtic/Viking from Iceland as my no 1 match on the G25 is also Iceland.

How much was the upgrade?

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Pribislav denies this widely accepted theory because main Serbian marker PH908 is unexistant among Sorbs, he tries to connect it to few lone families in Bohemia known as Nabsky Srbi
I asked for any peper speaking about this mysterious people but dude failed to show it. It's just a falsification because facts destroy idea DinS is proto-Serb marker.

[North Sea]

Real Thraco-Ilyrian

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

R1a M458 is low in Serbs; the connection between Serbs and Sorbs isn't taught at any university in the world, it's an internet theory and about as reliable as the idea that Hrvat comes from Iranic tribes

"Common theories from the 20th century derive it from an Iranian origin,[8] the root word being a third-century Scytho-Sarmatian form attested in the Tanais Tablets as Χοροάθος (Khoroáthos, alternate forms comprise Khoróatos and Khoroúathos)"

Even if "proto Serbs" came from Sorbs, it's meaningless for two reasons. 1: We're assuming the modern day Sorbs are identical to proto Sorbs/Serbs 1500 years ago. 2: We're assuming they came in any great number; in the vast majority of historical sources only the "Sclaveni" are mentioned, any "proto Sorbs" likely only passed on the name to whatever Sclaveni they mixed with. Same with the Iranic Hrvats, the Magyars, the Bulgars etc.

No it isn't even remotely similar as Iranic fantasies about Croats (or Serbs). It is widely accepted theory everywhere and your beloved DAI spoke exactly about it.
White Croats and White Serbs were historical tribes and there are numerous sources about them, toponyms and archeological findings. Only their homeland borders are disputable.

Their names could have Iranic root but at time of White Serbia/White Croatia they were clear Slavs.

[Bosniensis]

[img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Migration_of_serbs04_01.png[/ig]
[img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Dervan.png[/ig]

Pribislav denies this widely accepted theory because main Serbian marker PH908 is unexistant among Sorbs, he tries to connect it to few lone families in Bohemia known as Nabsky Srbi
I asked for any peper speaking about this mysterious people but dude failed to show it. It's just a falsification because facts destroy idea DinS is proto-Serb marker.

That is true.

Serbs are so large only because Romans joined them because of Roman Religion and loyalty to Eastern Roman Empire.

Same happened to people of Turkey who are mix of Anatolians and Turks.

[Carpatz]

Sorry, white knights are not graced with responses. Your ad homs are hysterical, though. Carry on, boy.

You don't have a proper response to this, dunecoon. You're an immigrant telling the native to leave.

[Morena]

Here is what I got:

Thracian + Illyrian (9.238)
Illyrian (9.434)
Gallo-Roman + Illyrian (9.775)
Gallo-Roman (11.88)
Thracian (12.18)

1. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (9.434)
2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (10.21)
3. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (10.73)
4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (11.88)
5. Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (12.01)
6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (12.18)
7. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (12.18)
8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (12.5)
9. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (12.99)

Closest modern population
1. Spanish_Extremadura (7.538)
2. Portuguese (7.625)
3. Spanish_Murcia (8.538)
4. Spanish_Galicia (8.939)

Seems legit.