My true ancestry.com

[Mortimer]

Im now Byzantine not Roman anymore new update

[Gallop]

New entry

[Rædwald]

Ancient Populations

Saxon + Frank (4.336)
Saxon (4.393)
Viking Danish + Frank (4.5)
Viking Danish + Saxon (4.568)
Visigoth + Saxon (4.601)
Viking Danish + Visigoth (4.612)
Viking Danish (5.984)
Frank (6.819)
Visigoth (7.729)
Celt (8.591)

Top 10 Samples

1. Saxon Hinxton (720 AD) ..... 4.393 - HinxtonO1 -     
Top 98% match vs all users

2. Celtic-Saxon Hinxton Iron Age (67 BC) ..... 5.825 - HI1 -     
Top 92% match vs all users

3. Late Iron Age Linton Cambridgeshire (205 BC) ..... 5.866 - Linton -     
Top 93% match vs all users

4. Post Viking Denmark Odense (1250 AD) ..... 5.984 - G48 -     
Top 93% match vs all users

5. Medieval Denmark (1250 AD) ..... 6.129 - G24 -     
Top 98% match vs all users

6. Celto-Germanic Medieval Denmark (1270 AD) ..... 6.269 - G21 -     
Top 93% match vs all users

7. Late Medieval Icelandic Murderer (1678 AD) ..... 6.557 - KOV-A2 -     
Top 95% match vs all users

8. Cambridgeshire Iron Age (205 BC) ..... 6.702 - 15594A -     
Top 94% match vs all users

9. Viking Saxon Iceland (1104 AD) ..... 6.757 - TSK-A26 -     
Top 96% match vs all users

10. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) ..... 6.819 - SZ23 -     
Top 86% match vs all users

Modern Populations

1. Southwest_English (4.893)
2. Welsh (4.923)
3. Southeast_English (5.438)
4. Flemish (6.008)
5. South_Dutch (6.697)
6. Danish (7.055)
7. Irish (7.060)
8. North_Dutch (7.109)

[tipirneni]

new entries

Ancient Japan Funadomari Jomon (610 BC) ..... - Funadomari5

Jomon entries

[someonenotyou]

Only change here is Franks and Visigoths are added.

[jalapeno]

I heard that it's all based on genetic distance and not admixture

[Pater Patota]

Romans 17.9%
Hellenic Romans 17%
Safavid Dynasty 12.7%
Alans 10.4%
Hittites 9.72%
Canaanites&Semites 8.49%
Pontic Empire 5.73%
Ancient Greeks 5.16%
Minoans 4.67%
Byzantine Empire 4.31%
Seleucid Empire 3.79%

Somewhat, Irano-Greek.

[Lemminkäinen]

I heard that it's all based on genetic distance and not admixture

Yeah, genetic distances give misleading results to mixed people, but if the distance figures admixtures, like a+b, the result can be correct. But admixture tests can give false results too. Admixture results depends on the used reference bundle. So getting things right calls always brain work. For example for me admixture tests give results between 100% Finnish to 40% Finnish + 60% German and all testers believe that their tests are scientifically perfect. All depends on methods

- using IBD's give different results than using allele distributions and again using autosomal haplotypes gives different results

- using different IBD cutoffs give different results

- additionally some commercial players fine tune results and in some cases the result can become even worse

[Davystayn]

Hi newbie here, I am from South West England, father is Welsh + Irish, mother from Derbyshire, English north midlands:



Your closest Ancient populations...
Viking Norwegian
Viking Norwegian + Celt (5.891)
Alemanni + Longobard (5.923)
Celt + Alemanni (6.003)
Viking Norwegian + Longobard (6.412)
Alemanni + Saxon (6.72)
Viking Norwegian (6.948)
Longobard (7.442)
Celt (7.563)
Saxon (8.878)
Alemanni (8.921)


Your closest genetic modern populations...


1. Orcadian (8.043)
2. West_Norwegian (8.182)
3. Welsh (8.473)
4. Norwegian (8.493)
5. North_Dutch (8.909)
6. Danish (9.102)
7. Southwest_English (9.163)
8. West_German (9.316)


Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...


1. Bell Beaker Scotland (2100 BC) ..... 5.309 -
Top 98% match vs all users

2. Nordic-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) ..... 6.547 -
Top 94% match vs all users

3. Norwegian Viking Iceland (1000 AD) ..... 6.948 -
Top 95% match vs all users

4. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 7.412 -
Top 82% match vs all users

5. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 7.442 -
Top 97% match vs all users

6. Medieval Norway Sankt Nikolai B (1448 AD) ..... 7.482 -
Top 90% match vs all users

7. Medieval Netherlands Plague II (1360 AD) ..... 7.505 - ?
Top 86% match vs all users

8. Late Iron Age Linton Cambridgeshire (205 BC) ..... 7.557 -
Top 81% match vs all users

9. Celtic Briton (70 BC) ..... 7.563
Top 94% match vs all users

10. Bell Beaker Southern France (2050 BC) ..... 8.44 -
Top 84% match vs all users

11. North Sea Medieval Denmark (1250 AD) ..... 8.448 -
Top 92% match vs all users

12. Early Bronze Age Thames (1800 BC) ..... 8.471 -
Top 73% match vs all users

13. Cambridgeshire Iron Age (205 BC) ..... 8.495 -
Top 82% match vs all users

14. Medieval Denmark (1250 AD) ..... 8.767 -
Top 99% match vs all users

15. Nordic Medieval Denmark (1250 AD) ..... 8.827
Top 99% match vs all users

16. Anglo Saxon Oakington (470 AD) ..... 8.841 -
Top 86% match vs all users

17. Anglo Saxon (720 AD) ..... 8.878 -
Top 95% match vs all users

18. Alemanni Tribe Mausoleo Augusto (500 AD) ..... 8.921 -
Top 97% match vs all users

19. Norwegian Medieval Denmark (1250 AD) ..... 8.943
Top 98% match vs all users

20. Medieval Denmark Revshale (1315 AD) ..... 9.057
Top 92% match vs all users


Fascinating stuff this!

[gixajo]

Ancient populations mytrueancestry

Gallo-Roman + Illyrian (5.494)
Visigoth + Illyrian (6.287)
Al-Andalus + Gallo-Roman (6.463)
Visigoth + Al-Andalus (6.628)
Visigoth + Gallo-Roman (6.887)
Gallo-Roman (7.995)
Visigoth (8.182)
Etruscan (9.448)
Al-Andalus (10.69)
Illyrian (10.85)

Your closest genetic modern populations...

Info
1. Spanish_Cantabria (4.357)
2. Southwest_French (4.930)
3. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (6.283)
4. Spanish_Aragon (6.486)
5. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (6.513)
6. Spanish_Valencia (7.676)
7. Spanish_Cataluna (7.774)
8. Spanish_Andalucia (8.285)

ancient population%

Gallo-Romans 18%
Iberians 14,8%
Etruscans 12,4%
Vascones 11,2%
Illiryans 9,99%
Visigoths 8,49%
Roman Hispania 7,02%
Latins 6,59%
Franks 4,44%
Al-Andalus 3,78%
Celts 3,1%