0








| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,994/42 Given: 432/0 |
“northeastern African origin of E-M78, with a corridor for bidirectional migrations between northeastern and eastern Africa (at least 2 episodes between 23.9-17.3 ky and 18.0-5.9 ky ago), trans-Mediterranean migrations directly from northern Africa to Europe (mainly in the last 13.0 ky), and flow from northeastern Africa to western Asia between 20.0 and 6.8 ky ago. A single clade within E-M78 (E-V13) highlights a range expansion in the Bronze Age of southeastern Europe”
In their source that they provided it literally says E-M78 migrated to Europe directly from Northern Africa ~13,000 years ago yet they say 4,000 years? Wtf am I misunderstanding something? Lol
Also where is this Levantine E-V13 ancestor? Nothing like that has been found yet the majority of European E-V13 can trace their origins to Middle East and Turkey where no ancestor to E-V13 was ever found. Interesting lol.
My arguments aren’t against you but 23 and me lol. Thanks for the post.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 62,906/2,637 Given: 65,174/942 |
Balkans Bronze Age cultures. Thats what 23andme says.








| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,994/42 Given: 432/0 |
Well researched post by user from another forum:
“It is no fantasy whatsoever that E-V13 arrived to Europe directly from North Africa, and that it did not arrive from Levant. This is pre-history and those without archaeological knowledge are basically blind..
So..
There exists archaeological evidence for such migration, in the form of Capsian elements in Late Mesolithic site Crvena Stijena III in modern West Montenegro. What is interesting is that this particular site had direct connections to the site where L618 was found in Dalmatia. 100 % people from Crvena Stijena also participated in some form in Cardial Dalmatian Neolithic culture. Dalmatian Neolithic is known to have had some Meoslithic influence, also autosomally seen in one sample there with a bunch of blue eye mutations and WHG influence.
To quote Yugoslav archaeologist Borivoj Čović:
The culture of Mesolithic inhabitants of Crvena Stijena is firmly tied to the contemporary cultures of Northern Africa, especially to those of so-called Capsian type... The congruence in shapes of a large number of smaller tools (out of which some are highly specialized tools for fine processing of skin and bones) are of such degree that they do not leave much space to doubt, and primarily Northafrican origin not only of these forms but also of the Mesolithic population of Crvena Stijena.
Furthermore going by current genetic evidence the Dalmatian Cardial sample is negative to two SNP's at the L618 level, that in addition to their current spread might be used as evidence to suggest all of current L618, V13- samples are of European origin. For one L618 clade that already seems obvious. Second clade has Latvian-Lebanese connection but this connection is not Neolithic it is 4800 years old. So either the Lebanese is a descendant of L618 who stayed in Levant or he arrived in EBA from Europe, considering the current evidence latter is more likely.
Interestingly as I mentioned here, there was a skull cult throughout the Dalmatian Cardial Neolithic, without any doubt this pratice is something that was very important to those people. The problem is its origin is unclear. First connotation were Natufians but typologically it resembles more the Mesolithic practices found in Iron Gates culture as well as in some Croatian late Mesolithic sites. As Iberomaurusians and Capsians also showed signs of special treatment of skulls, so direct North African connotation of this cult cannot be excluded.
Additionally in Dalmatian Neolithic the burial practice of leaving the deceased, except chiefs, to be unburied and eaten by wild animals in wilderness has been compared to Maasai by a Yugoslav archaeologist.
But think of this, if E-V13 did arrive from Levant in Neolithic as part of Cardial Pottery wave, then this skull cult descends of Natufians, and because of its importance it can be postulated that the E-V13 throughout Neolithic never spoke Etruscan or some usual EEF, but rather Afroasiatic. From my perspective preferably something proto-Egyptian-like (when I was 12 I knew lot about most pyramids) and Semitic ethnogenesis is closely associated with later J1-Z2331, J2-M205 spread.
Autosomally Dalmatian Neolithic samples had small Iberomaurusian-like influence that EEF's by and large lacked. Though one can connect this to Natufians as well who were 27 % Iberomaurusian.”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 12/0 Given: 0/0 |
Interesting. But 1st E-V13 were already 'Causoid' or it is the same debate than its ancestor haplogroup E, which nobody is certain it was SSA or Eurasian in origin ?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 81/0 Given: 99/6 |
Some of you have written that E-V13 are descending from some elite people, well, it's always flattering to read such things haha![]()








| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,994/42 Given: 432/0 |
Bump. Anyone have any new information about E-V13?








| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,994/42 Given: 432/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 18,381/37 Given: 18,994/0 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks