My true ancestry.com

[**JC**]

So I decided to take advantage of the 40% off Olympus myfakeancestry this weekend.
I was curious about the dna of Louis XVI

Relic French King Louis XVI (LXVI) LOL!

Roman Outlier Lombard Grave
590 AD SZ1
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 100)
4 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 57.84 cM
Largest segment=205 SNPs / 17.24 cM
Your raw DNA is 1 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
120 SNPs
Chr. 8
133 SNPs
Chr. 12
205 SNPs
Chr. 18
126 SNPs

Protovillanovia Martinsicuro
930 BC R1
mtDNA: U5a2b
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 94)
3 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 40.69 cM
Largest segment=166 SNPs / 16.03 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
166 SNPs
Chr. 8
106 SNPs
Chr. 18
126 SNPs

Tivoli Palace Late Renaissance
1650 AD R969
mtDNA: U5bY-DNA: J2a1b
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 83)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 15.06 cM
Largest segment=183 SNPs / 15.06 cM
Your raw DNA is 28 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
183 SNPs

Thraco-Cimmerian Black Sea
900 BC MJ12
mtDNA: H35
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 18)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 12.08 cM
Largest segment=130 SNPs / 12.08 cM
Your raw DNA is 34 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 16
130 SNPs

Late Medieval Cancelleria Basilica
1485 AD R1221
mtDNA: H1e2Y-DNA: J2a1h2a1
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 63)
2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 18.93 cM
Largest segment=122 SNPs / 11.18 cM
Your raw DNA is 51 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
108 SNPs
Chr. 6
122 SNPs

Roman/Illyrian Celio Military Hospital
500 AD R36
mtDNA: T1a1Y-DNA: R1b1a2a1a2b3c
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 63)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 11.14 cM
Largest segment=137 SNPs / 11.14 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
137 SNPs

Tuscan Medieval Cancelleria Basilica
1350 AD R1290
mtDNA: H1c3a
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 57)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 8.9 cM
Largest segment=166 SNPs / 8.9 cM
Your raw DNA is 41 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 12
166 SNPs

Etruscan Civitavecchia
650 BC R474
mtDNA: HY-DNA: J-M12
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 62)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 8.75 cM
Largest segment=131 SNPs / 8.75 cM
Your raw DNA is 30 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 12
131 SNPs

Imperial Rome Mausoleo Augusto
500 AD R33
mtDNA: K1aY-DNA: R1b1a2a1a2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 70)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 8.48 cM
Largest segment=120 SNPs / 8.48 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 12
120 SNPs

Roman Mix San Ercolano
500 AD R118
mtDNA: H1e1aY-DNA: H2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 41)
2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 13.84 cM
Largest segment=150 SNPs / 8.26 cM
Your raw DNA is 53 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
150 SNPs
Chr. 11
126 SNPs

Tuscan Late Medieval Villa Magna Italy
1355 AD R54
mtDNA: H4a1Y-DNA: J2b2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 49)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 6.65 cM
Largest segment=106 SNPs / 6.65 cM
Your raw DNA is 10 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 12
106 SNPs

Central Roman
590 AD SZ32
mtDNA: H74 ?
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 17)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 4.11 cM
Largest segment=115 SNPs / 4.11 cM
Your raw DNA is 34 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
115 SNPs

Gallo-Roman Lombard Grave
580 AD CL94
mtDNA: K1c1Y-DNA: R1b1a1a2a1a2f
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 19)
2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 7.55 cM
Largest segment=163 SNPs / 3.99 cM
Your raw DNA is 60 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 12
163 SNPs
Chr. 20
111 SNPs

Central Roman
580 AD CL121
mtDNA: T2Y-DNA: R1b1a2a2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 19)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 3.44 cM
Largest segment=153 SNPs / 3.44 cM
Your raw DNA is 33 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 11
153 SNPs

Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol
2775 BC I3499
mtDNA: T2eY-DNA: R1b1a1a2a2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 19)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 1.72 cM
Largest segment=134 SNPs / 1.72 cM
Your raw DNA is 60 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 8
134 SNPs

So the "French" king was Italian.
Yep, I was right.
Poser.

[PaleoEuropean]

Some new matches

[**JC**]

Fascinating Mediterranean connections through my mother.

Viking St. Brice Massacre Oxford
1002 AD V1P
mtDNA: J1c3e1 Y-DNA: Uncertain
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 4)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 6.11 cM
Largest segment=111 SNPs / 6.11 cM
Your raw DNA is 37 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 2
111 SNPs

Closest Ancient
Celt + Iberian (4.554)
Viking Icelandic + Celtiberian (5.826)
Celt + Celtiberian (6.255)
Celt (6.777)
Viking Icelandic + Iberian (7.273)
Celt + Vascones (8.061)
Celtiberian (10.95)
Vascones (11.09)
Viking Icelandic (15.5)
Iberian (18.56)

Closest Modern
1. Spanish_Basque (11.85)
2. French_Basque (15.19)
3. Spanish_Aragon (21.00)
4. Southwest_French (21.19)
5. Spanish_Cantabria (22.01)
6. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (22.66)
7. Spanish_Valencia (23.24)
8. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (23.54)

Similar Samples
Halstatt Celt (775 BC) (6.777)
Bronze Age Koenigsbrunn Germany (2012 BC) (8.156)
Vatya Bronze Age Hungary (1750 BC) (10.64)
High Status Bronze Age Wehringen (1865 BC) (10.68)
Celtiberian Northern Spain (350 BC) (10.95)

Trumpington Meadows Bronze Age
2705 BC TRM101
mtDNA: K1a20 Y-DNA: I2a2a
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 70)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 5.75 cM
Largest segment=126 SNPs / 5.75 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 1
126 SNPs

Closest Ancient (A Sardinian in ancient Briton!)
Latin + Balari (4.472)
Balari (5.84)
Latin + Iolaes (7.026)
Iolaes + Balari (9.568)
Phoenician + Balari (10.13)
Carthaginian + Balari (10.42)
Iolaes (14.11)

Closest Modern (Huge genetic distances!)
1. Sardinian (23.16)
2. French_Basque (30.85)
3. Spanish_Aragon (32.44)
4. Spanish_Cantabria (32.47)
5. Southwest_French (32.71)
6. Spanish_Andalucia (33.21)
7. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (33.47)
8. Spanish_Basque (34.19)

Similar Samples
Late Neolithic Aesch Switzerland (3000 BC) (1.945)
Late Neolithic Aesch Switzerland (3000 BC) (2.412)
Early Copper Age Porto Torres Sardinia (2100 BC) (2.997)
Late Neolithic Aesch Switzerland (3000 BC) (3.184)
Trumpington Meadows Bronze Age (2705 BC) (3.733)

[Rokhan]

[calxpal]

I decided to buy the upgrade a few days ago =) and I've been having fun with it, I was especially interested in seeing more deep dive matches. I'm excited to see what else they add in the future, and It's always fun to look at everyone else's results too....

[**JC**]

I decided to buy the upgrade a few days ago =) and I've been having fun with it, I was especially interested in seeing more deep dive matches. I'm excited to see what else they add in the future, and It's always fun to look at everyone else's results too....

It is fun isn't it. Take it all with a pinch of salt though especially the Deep Dive results, set the cM and SNP slider to around 7cM and 200-500 SNP respectively, this should give you a more realistic DNA relationship to the samples.
After looking at the latest update MTA have removed the cM slider. The SNP slider remains to play around with.
I have a whole bunch of "relatives" but once I've set the SNP slider to a more realistic level, in my case 400 SNPs
This is what I get. Just the one individual.

Norwegian Viking Iceland
1000 AD STT-A2
mtDNA: U4b1b1 Y-DNA: R1b1a1a2a1a2c1
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 93)
1 SNP chain (min. 400 SNPs) / 7.57 cM
Largest segment=432 SNPs / 7.57 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 11
432 SNPs

The genetic matches seen to be pretty accurate, in my case mostly Germanic and Celtic.
And something that's really noticeable is the north/south dna separation in the posters here that use MTA.

Try Ged-Match as an alternative if you haven't done so as well. *edit* You're a senior member, obviously you know and use Ged-Match *Doh!

[Gallop]

My first 10 matches in MTA.


Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
(Smaller numbers mean closer matches to you)
Info

1. Visigoth Iberian Girona (550 AD) ..... 8.765 - I12034 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

2. Roman Soldier Germany (300 AD) ..... 9.032 - FN_2
Top 99 % match vs all users

3. Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany (300 AD) ..... 9.04 - FN_2
Top 99 % match vs all users

4. Gallo-Roman Lombard Grave (580 AD) ..... 9.106 - CL94 -
Top 98 % match vs all users

5. Girona Sant Julia de Ramis (880 AD) ..... 9.193 - I10895 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

6. Roman-Era Empuries (47 BC) ..... 9.529 - I10866 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

7. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol (2775 BC) ..... 10.09 - I3499 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

8. Etruscan Civitavecchia (650 BC) ..... 10.31 - R474 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

9. Bell Beaker Haunstetten Germany (2385 BC) ..... 10.35 - UNTA58_68Sk1 -
Top 99 % match vs all users

10. Late Copper Age Italy (2600 BC) ..... 10.49 - 9314_Oss
Top 99 % match vs all users

[calxpal]

It is fun isn't it. Take it all with a pinch of salt though especially the Deep Dive results, set the cM and SNP slider to around 7cM and 200-500 SNP respectively, this should give you a more realistic DNA relationship to the samples.
After looking at the latest update MTA have removed the cM slider. The SNP slider remains to play around with.
I have a whole bunch of "relatives" but once I've set the SNP slider to a more realistic level, in my case 400 SNPs
This is what I get. Just the one individual.

Norwegian Viking Iceland
1000 AD STT-A2
mtDNA: U4b1b1 Y-DNA: R1b1a1a2a1a2c1
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 93)
1 SNP chain (min. 400 SNPs) / 7.57 cM
Largest segment=432 SNPs / 7.57 cM
Your raw DNA is 20 % closer than other matching users
Chr. 11
432 SNPs

The genetic matches seen to be pretty accurate, in my case mostly Germanic and Celtic.
And something that's really noticeable is the north/south dna separation in the posters here that use MTA.

Try Ged-Match as an alternative if you haven't done so as well. *edit* You're a senior member, obviously you know and use Ged-Match *Doh!

I did decide to play with the slider and I did lose quite a bit of deep dive matches with increasing SNP length, these are the only 2 I get at 400 SNP's which is realistic with my known ancestry.

Bronze Age Germany
1050 BC
I0099
mtDNA: H23Y-DNA: Uncertain

You are a top 98 % match to this sample! This makes your relationship to this individual exceptional.
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 43)
1 SNP chain (min. 401 SNPs) / 4.49 cM
Largest segment=805 SNPs / 4.49 cM

Your raw DNA is 98 % closer than other matching users


Chr. 6

805 SNPs





Germanic Lombard Szolad
590 AD
SZ3
mtDNA: H18Y-DNA: I2a
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 100)
2 SNP chains (min. 401 SNPs) / 42.84 cM
Largest segment=476 SNPs / 22.06 cM
(Sample is too new for user comparison)

Chr. 6

476 SNPs






Chr. 12

422 SNPs





I don't think all of the lower SNP matches are unrealistic though because my parents and my grandma's kit matches some of them too, although I definitely agree that it should all be taken with a pinch of salt and Gedmatch is definitely good for comparisons . Anyways thanks for sharing .

[PaleoEuropean]

New Top matches by Era:


Kit 1

















Kit 2:

[**JC**]

*Update*

Matching Samples

17. Ollsjo Battleaxe Sweden (2860 BC) ..... 7.129 - oll007 -
Top 91 % match vs all users

148. Bergsgraven Oestergotland Sweden (2560 BC) ..... 12.49 - ber2 -
Top 77 % match vs all users

Deep Dive
Ollsjo Battleaxe Sweden 2860 BC oll007
mtDNA: H1c
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 63)
2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 18.97 cM
Largest segment=125 SNPs / 10.49 cM
(Sample is too new for user comparison)

Chr. 3
125 SNPs
Chr. 10
108 SNPs

Closest Ancient
Celt + Ostrogoth (3.257)
Celt + Saxon (3.599)
Saxon + Frank (4.254)
Celt (4.653)
Celt + Frank (5.019)
Saxon + Ostrogoth (5.064)
Saxon (5.227)
Frank (8.381)
Ostrogoth (8.996)
Vandal (9.451)

Closest Modern
1. Irish (6.785)
2. North_German (6.840)
3. Southeast_English (7.249)
4. Southwest_English (7.626)
5. West_Scottish (7.959)
6. Danish (8.358)
7. North_Dutch (8.471)
8. South_Dutch (8.996)

Similar Samples
Proto-Celtic Bronze Age Wehringen (2240 BC) (4.583)
Post Viking Denmark Odense (1250 AD) (4.617)
Viking Denmark Revshale (1080 AD) (4.618)
Post Viking Denmark Tirup (1200 AD) (4.623)
Gaelic Settler Viking Iceland (935 AD) (4.653)