0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,467/7 Given: 1,535/1 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,467/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
--


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 22/0 Given: 6/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,645/170 Given: 40/24 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,645/170 Given: 40/24 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 581/2 Given: 703/0 |
MyHeritage SNPs got fucking low though and their ethnicity estimates arent worth it.
69.3% Ukrainian + 30.7% Italian_Jewish @ 2.52


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,467/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
this is how the new averages plot. south Croats, Bosniaks and Serbs form a cluster together. so of course some Serbs will get Croat as #1, and the opposite. all it takes is 1% or 2% more or less of a component.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,562/100 Given: 15,204/52 |
Isn't that absurd that Croats, who are almost twice as less numbered than Serbs, have 11 samples on calculator, and Serbs 4?
Yes, they are far more heterogeneus than us, but half of these regional averages are worthless and should be deleted.
🔴
🔵
⚪
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks