Serbian Autosomal DNA

[Jana]

Guys, you cannot create averages for every single municipality, that's silly and unnecessary. Serbia is a country of 7 million, Croatia has like 4 or so.

Don't troll.
I made averages for historical regions, so far 4 for Croatia plus capital city and 3 for BiH. There is nothing wrong in that. Especially with different geography, climate and history each of them has.

Serb new averages haven't been added to calculator yet, that is none of my business.

[Dušan]

Guys, you cannot create averages for every single municipality, that's silly and unnecessary. Serbia is a country of 7 million, Croatia has like 4 or so.

Either to insert real Serb_Croatia average, either to delete all regional averages, just to stay general Serb and general Croat.

She made average for Tropolje - rural primitive three municipalities of 30.000 inhabitants.. WTF!?

[Dušan]

I don't care for your complains, you are some complexed guy obviously. There is nothing biased about my averages, and they are all made of full ethnic Croats plus academic samples.

You meanwhile, are using questionable samples from HungryLion and Pribislav to shift Serb average as north as possible just because of your personal scores.

Yeah, with 33% Baltic you will be closer to Croats because Serb average is nowhere near that unless you pull it there artificially.

Deal with it.

No, I am with my almost 34% Baltic closer to Serbian general average (5.85) than to Croat general average (7.32)
I am also closer to Serbs from Serbia (6.36) than Croats of Croatia (7.76).

Only Croats that are close to me are B&H.
This one Balkanites.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUYVHSmIEOM

Real Serb_Croatia average is related to Bosnian Serb average. It is not Sandžak shifted like it is in calculator.

Not need milion Croatian averages in calculator. Only one for B&H Croats, not 4.

Tropolje

[Fedora]

The overall distances are still close between Ex-Yugoslavians

[Jana]

Many south shifted full Croats will end up getting Serb averages on top, who cares?
It doesn't mean they are Serbs, just that their genetic profile is closer to their averages.

I will be doing updates anyway and will probably remove academic samples as we don't really know their real origin.

[Jana]

Also, if new Serb averages have regions like Shopluk I don't see problem with Croatian regions. Or Serb_Dalmatia, do you know how little Serbs live there now?

These silly complains make no sense, Tropolje for example is old historical region just like Bosnia or Herzegovina are.

I have no problem if more Serb averages are added, the more the better.

[knez01]

Either to insert real Serb_Croatia average, either to delete all regional averages, just to stay general Serb and general Croat.

She made average for Tropolje - rural primitive three municipalities of 30.000 inhabitants.. WTF!?

Tropolje has over 80 thousand people

[Jana]

Tropolje has over 80 thousand people

And much more people of such origin in Zagreb or diaspora.
I think some people want to pretend all these regions are identical and propagate that, but don't really care for genetics and see sub-regional structure of their population.

Can't believe I am attacked for having many regions, attack if I have too little.
And I put so many hours of hard work into that.

[knez01]

And much more people of such origin in Zagreb or diaspora.
I think some people want to pretend all these regions are identical and propagate that, but don't really care for genetics and see sub-regional structure of their population.

Can't believe I am attacked for having many regions, attack if I have too little.
And I put so many hours of hard work into that.

Remember who you're responding to, nothing more than a butthurt tractor

[CommonSense]

And what is legit? What some American Mingle say about Serbian autosomal genetics? Or Serbophobe Feiichy?

According to this, 70% Krajina Serbs will not get Serb_Croatia as #1, but most probably Bosniak or Croat_Dalmatia or Croat Herzegovina.
Thats what this shitty calculator will tell.

Distance of 1.01 is too much?