1


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 19,917/84 Given: 5,889/35 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,464/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,868/149 Given: 444/392 |
I agree with this approach, within one nation there should be differentiations based on regions (8-10 at max) rather than counties or cities (with the exception of the capital, which is often the meeting point of all regions), otherwise we get way too many results from the same nation.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,835/73 Given: 8,960/67 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,868/149 Given: 444/392 |
I believe 5 samples should be absolute minimum to create any separate cluster, and even that is kinda on the borderline. Now I do wonder if anyone still even knows on how many samples are the various groupings even created on? Rather have one or two well representative national categories than 7-8 based on 2-3 samples each.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
In my opinion 3 samples should be absolute minimum for one average, around 10 is decent. 1 is unacceptable, that person can be atypical for the region and that's not average.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,319/30 Given: 2,681/16 |
K36 Genetic Similarity Report & K36 Advanced Chromosomal Analysis (Automated)
https://lm-genetics.com
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,868/149 Given: 444/392 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,192/35 Given: 2,504/11 |
Do you have the PCA with the new french sample?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks