Slavic G25 (ancient) calculator

[Coastal Elite]

No point in this calc for NW Euros, especially not for Irish since their mix requires NW Euro Beaker samples, which for Slavs/eastern euros aren't relevant.

I know it's not intended for NW Euros but I just like to see what comes up. Sometimes the fits are better than you might expect.

[Peterski]

That is why I start to doubt how much reliable these samples are.

Here is what some Wielkopolskans score in your calculator:

(can you reveal what are your 3 Slavic reference samples - I suppose modern Slovaks are among them)



For comparison - here is how we plot in the Global25 PCA:

[Polrebby]

These samples are not mixed if that is what you mean, entire Croatia was homogemously North Italian like in bronze age, both in Dalmatia and Slavonia and very similar to early Italics/Latins, Etruscans and Republican Romans.

But, I doubt such genetic profile remained in Balkans for long because modern Balkanites (even most Croats) usually can't be modeled with it so well.

.

Albanians in many calcs have central Italian affinity.

[Ion Basescul]

Usual discrepancy between my parents results and mine as in every Gedmatch or G25 calc I think FTDNA tested them using different chip, although it was not officially stated. SNP number is the same anyway.


To have higher Baltic and Greco-Roman in the same time than both of them is not very probable...

Target: Lukasz_scaled
Distance: 2.5041% / 0.02504113 | ADC: 0.25x
52.2 Slavic
39.6 Baltic
8.2 Greco-Roman

Target: mother
Distance: 1.5541% / 0.01554147 | ADC: 0.25x
80.4 Slavic
11.8 Baltic
5.0 Greco-Roman
2.2 Balkan
0.6 Celtic

Target: father
Distance: 2.3031% / 0.02303099 | ADC: 0.25x
59.0 Slavic
36.2 Baltic
3.4 Greco-Roman
1.4 Celtic

Not very probable, but at the same time it's entirely possible. You should look at more results of parents and offspring. This is more common than you think.

https://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/...hy-it-matters/

[Lucas]

Not very probable, but at the same time it's entirely possible. You should look at more results of parents and offspring. This is more common than you think.

https://blogs.ancestry.com/ancestry/...hy-it-matters/

Those results aren't the best examples


Because Ireland, Britain and West Euro ancestry are similar for those family as we see, and could be interchangeable to large extent. Look that their Finnish level is stable for example

[Jana]

Here is what some Wielkopolskans score in your calculator:

(can you reveal what are your 3 Slavic reference samples - I suppose modern Slovaks are among them)



For comparison - here is how we plot in the Global25 PCA:

It's ancient calculator as title say, I never use nodern samples for such calculations.

Slavic inclides early Czech Slav, Avar Szolad and Sunghir medieval Russian.

I think in new version I 'll use only individual samples instead of averages, for cleaner results.

[Karol Klačansky]

Here is what some Wielkopolskans score in your calculator:

(can you reveal what are your 3 Slavic reference samples - I suppose modern Slovaks are among them)



For comparison - here is how we plot in the Global25 PCA:

She used Czech early Slav, szolad avar, and Rus sunghir.

Share your results bro!

Sent from my ANE-LX1 using Tapatalk

[Peterski]

Share your results bro!

I did, Wlkp1a and Wlkp1b is me with two different raw data files.

[Jana]

I did, Wlkp1a and Wlkp1b is me with two different raw data files.

Well you are very Slavic on this and less Germanic than I would expect.

[Jana]

Albanians in many calcs have central Italian affinity.

Yes, but they prefer Bulgarian IA over Croatian for modeling. All Balkanites do actually except Slovenians/NW Croats and that's just probably genetic similarity not direct ancestry.

These BA Balkan samples are problematic so Sorbs and Czechs score substantially because it's similar to some celtic samples. I will most likely remove them in next run.