0












| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,917/235 Given: 4,895/41 |
Neolithic.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,352/194 Given: 5,348/287 |












| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,917/235 Given: 4,895/41 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,517/197 Given: 912/0 |
Either it came directly from N. Africa (not widely accepted) or it came from Anatolia (widely accepted).


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,352/194 Given: 5,348/287 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,352/194 Given: 5,348/287 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,517/197 Given: 912/0 |
Problem is that the modern distribution of E-M78 clades is widely centred in West Asia. Populations such as the Druze have very high amounts of E-V13.
The Druze are one of the most ancient communities in West Asia.
but this doesn't seem to match up with aDNA.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 25,704/1,988 Given: 23,913/1,658 |












| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,917/235 Given: 4,895/41 |
Here we go, my stubborn brother.
Of the 9% of E1b1 in Iberia, only 4% are M81, this, indeed, were introduced by berbers or by punics/carthagians that had a decent north african admixture.
1 sample of E-M78 in the chalcolithic is more than enough to justify the 4% of E-M78 in Iberia.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks