2


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 604/63 Given: 140/13 |
Well overall theyre not even remotely 40% North African. So obviously just some founder effect going on.
Btw read this study. In the Bronze age "nearly 100%" of Iberian samples had steppe R1 lineages. So my guess is most E-M81 in Iberia comes after the Bronze age.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6432/1230
I don't see why you give much of a shit about possibly having a few drops of Berber ancestry. The Numidians were great cavalrymen and played a major role in destroying some of Rome's biggest armies under Hannibal. Also the later Moors had an advanced culture. These weren't 75 IQ people living in mud huts. Nor would they have even looked all that different from Celts and Iberians.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 604/63 Given: 140/13 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 25,704/1,988 Given: 23,913/1,658 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 604/63 Given: 140/13 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,047/383 Given: 14,230/1,009 |












| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,917/235 Given: 4,895/41 |
I know... 22% of galicians have J2 and a decent bunch in Lugo (where my last name comes) have R1b-L21, guess what they have in common with greeks and limeys: Nothing.
The curious thing is how the fuck that happend, even the case of the pasiegos are more curious, being like an hybrid of basques and burgalese castillians genetically.
I4246, Bell Beaker, 2473-2030 cal BCE
mtDNA: E1b1b1a(xE1b1b1a1)
Our Copper Age dataset includes a newly reported male (I4246) from Camino de las Yeseras (14) in central Iberia, radiocarbon dated to 2473–2030 calibrated years BCE, who clusters with modern and ancient North Africans in the PCA and, like ~3000 BCE Moroccans, can be well modeled as having ancestry from both Late Pleistocene North Africans and Early Neolithic Europeans.
Waaaaaaaaay old E1b... Before the arrive of the Bell-Beakers (R1b-DF27) and the Celts (R1b-DF27 & R1b-U152). This people (E1b) mixed with EEF and the WHG, and there is our small iberomaurusian (or a big part of it) explained. Of course the celts made it smaller, and that´s it.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 604/63 Given: 140/13 |
On PCA in genome wide affinity he clusters with Late Neolithic Morrocans. They aren't really in the European zone genetically. These aren't the same as the Sardinian like farmers who settled Europe.
Anyway, this guy precedes the Steppe incursion into Iberia. And lastly E1b1b1a is not E1b1b-M81.












| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,917/235 Given: 4,895/41 |
How were Late Neolithic Moroccans? Let's see how it was:
Target: MAR_LN:KEB.4
Distance: 2.9750% / 0.02975041
65.8 Anatolia_Barcin_N
27.0 MAR_Taforalt
5.8 Levant_Natufian
1.4 ITA_Villabruna
Nothing less tham 67% european according my ancient components model. This E-M78 was technically an EEF with strong iberomaurisian ancestry, and surprisingly, levantine farmer.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,352/194 Given: 5,348/287 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,352/194 Given: 5,348/287 |
He clusters with both modern and late neolithic moroccans
as you can see he's very close to me :
Distance to: Nassbean_scaled
0.07035651 Iberia_Central_CA_Afr:I4246
Very similar :
if this haplogroup was mainly brought by EEF we would have at least found the same amount of it all over southern europe but that's not the case there is a big contrast between iberia and other parts of Europe and no copper or bronze samples had this haplogroup + EEF themselves rarely had this Haplogroup. So as I said most of it came directly from north africa during ancient and medieval times ( Punic, roman and moorish presence).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks