MENA and genetic distances

[gixajo]

Anyway, I like discovering that reference Iberian_N, I´ve never used before, that could be useful.

[gixajo]

And this simple variation of the typical ancient references based model?

GEO_CHG,0.091058,0.102568,-0.083344,-0.00323,-0.08617,0.020638,0.024911,-0.001846,-0.128236,-0.074717,-0.006333,0.023979,-0.054856,0.004404,0.026601,-0.03275,0.02386,-0.013429,-0.022249,0.034767,0.033815,-0.007048,0.006532,-0.025787,-0.002036
IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N,0.0430252,0.0664158,-0.1550722,0.0047158,-0.122669,0.0235384,0.017109,-0.0011998,-0.082546,-0.0544158,-0.0028258,-0.0016186,0.0044896,-0.0062756,0.0316498,0.0561384,-0.0054242,0.0068664,0.0136508,-0.0334162,0.00856,-0.028836,-0.0110678,-0.039331,0.0222254
TUR_Barcin_N,0.1175998,0.180118,0.0035312,-0.101158,0.0510443,-0.0483875,-0.0043582,-0.0069334,0.0362287,0.0807473,0.0079718,0.0118803,-0.0234545,0.0004691,-0.0419807,-0.0101913,0.0233091,0.0019866,0.0136954,-0.0097489,-0.0142249,0.0057723,-0.0041232,-0.0031658,-0.0043437
Levant_Natufian,0.020488,0.1431895,-0.0377125,-0.1387295,0.030775,-0.079484,-0.025616,-0.0175375,0.114329,0.002005,0.0332085,-0.0222555,0.076486,0.002133,0.0153365,0.009016,-0.0154505,-0.001014,-0.02206,0.040832,0.001497,0.0001235,-0.003636,-0.0044585,0.006287
Yamnaya_RUS_Samara,0.1255849,0.089028,0.0426986,0.1153479,-0.0287232,0.0450564,0.0036033,-0.0025642,-0.0559032,-0.0728943,0.0018222,3.32e-05,-0.0026924,-0.0233041,0.0366141,0.0157633,-0.0012316,-0.0017879,-0.0038408,0.0137704,-0.0031749,0.0007557,0.0110649,0.0186102,-0.004537
TZA_Pemba_600BP,-0.616921,0.066009,0.021119,0.011305,0.004001,0.013108,-0.00987,0.016153,-0.020248,0.002187,0.000812,0.007943,-0.014717,0.003165,-0.019272,0.005304,-0.014212,0.00266,-0.006034,0.006503,0.004118,0.003957,0.001849,0.005663,0.003233
LUX_Loschbour,0.133173,0.106631,0.20176,0.192186,0.164338,0.055778,0.00611,0.036922,0.096535,0.02278,-0.020786,-0.016186,0.024975,-0.007432,0.065824,0.063643,0.008084,0.006714,-0.013324,0.065281,0.120038,0.019166,-0.059405,-0.175687,0.022992
MAR_Taforalt,-0.189857,0.0814452,-0.0242866,-0.085595,0.027636,-0.0552202,-0.0705968,0.0184146,0.155397,0.003499,0.0209156,-0.0318316,0.0747168,-0.0513334,0.0711988,-0.0363032,0.0052676,-0.066106,-0.1424162,0.0389938,-0.0376836,-0.1255322,0.0730118,-0.0137606,0.0164534
Hun_Tian_Shan,0.0867453,-0.0678801,0.0366602,0.047702,-0.0416433,0.0071483,0.0034508,0.0032548,-0.0173307,-0.0242373,-0.0082134,-0.0019088,0.0009623,-0.0222369,0.0142363,0.0097069,-0.0019694,0.001867,-0.0008601,0.0016522,-0.0145467,0.0016401,-0.0011352,0.0035261,2.53e-05

[gixajo]

[gixajo]

In the end I think that I will continue to use the traditional models with old references, at least to observe the different levels of genetic contributions in pre-Neolithic, Neolithic and post-Neolithic Europe.

In the end that is the objective of this type of model, not to see who is more or less European, Asian or African.

[gixajo]

In the end I think that I will continue to use the traditional models with old references, at least to observe the different levels of genetic contributions in pre-Neolithic, Neolithic and post-Neolithic Europe.

In the end that is the objective of this type of model, not to see who is more or less European, Asian or African.

I say this, because in the end it seems that that was the intention of this thread from the beginning, and I have no interest in discerning something like that, because I, like any Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Greek, Balkan are 100% European.