0




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |







| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,876/11 Given: 3,561/7 |
You can argue that Aeduard's point is correct, although there are 2 factors at play:
1) Despite the privileges of Hungarians and Szeklers, peasants were peasants and the aforementioned privileges did not concern them; mixing will happen.
2) Even so, the religious barrier proved itself to be at least partially effective in keeping populations separate from each other. The greek-catholic church probably helped with said barrier.
I think that if certified 4/4 Csango grandparent results would come up in enough numbers, we could probably use those to safely say whether mixing was older (celtic/germanic, pre-Hungarian state), or over the course of the 1000 years together.
Just a 26.6% European individual
G25 "26.6% Austrian:Austria6 + 73.4% Romanian:G408" "0.0096"
EU TEST 86.9% RO + 13.1% West_&_Central_German @ 4.98
K13 56.9% Tu(ran)scan + 43.1% Ukrainian @ 4.02


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7,041/308 Given: 10,500/177 |
These oracles shit are absolutely ridiculous. We all inherit a random selection of our ancestors' genes plus errors caused by genetic drift... In racial anthropology there is something similar called convergent evolution but racial anthropology is a lot more exact as well as being fully attributable to historic events: why do people in SE Balkans, regardless of language, look more or less the same (with regional variation), whether they are Romanian, Bulgarian or Hungarian speakers? Because before Romans, Slavs, Magyars one people used to live there: the Thracians...




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,189/719 Given: 20,246/1,181 |
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,189/719 Given: 20,246/1,181 |
Apart from those 4, two more, but which - not the ones who are Serbian-like?
Yes this makes sense! They are more German than the one who claimed being Saxon but was closest to Serbs, LOL.
Can't be a "full" Saxon.
=====
Edit:
As for A189XXX which I sent you - false alarm, he is not a Saxon, not even fully German.
Last edited by Peterski; 10-19-2020 at 10:01 AM.
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,189/719 Given: 20,246/1,181 |
Top Closest population average to Transylvanian Saxons (only the 4 ones that I found):
[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE%"
DE_Bavaria:Modern
0.5219291
(...)
They are closest to my average for Bavaria.
So these people are not at all like East Germans from Elbe-Oder area and from Poland.
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,189/719 Given: 20,246/1,181 |
So the ones who stayed in Romania, most likely have intermarried with Romanians during the last 50 years.
Or how otherwise do you explain that they are so Non-Germanic despite claiming "fully" Saxon ancestry?
I think they must be recently mixed with Romanians/Hungarians.
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks