1


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,631/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
@Peterski^^^^you don't need to explain who is fully Frisian, we have that kit already.
Your total lack of fair play, unwillingness to share data you have for whole community (except for fat counter favors), your intentional releasing of promised samples immediately AFTER we release the averages (and knowing it will be unnecessary hard to upgrade samples now) shows your intentions which are everything but fair.
Not to mention you got kit numbers from rothaer days ago but did not share what you have at all. And you don't need to. You lied to do what you did not, and do not pretend to be benevolent.
You won't be begged for samples especially considering rothaer gave many of them to you years ago, we'll get them anyway. And don't expect any more samples and information coming your way, because it won't.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 8,341/42 Given: 8,640/5 |
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,112/717 Given: 20,205/1,181 |
"You won't be begged for samples especially considering rothaer gave many of them to you years ago"
First I gave him all of German data that I had at that time. It seems you like to have selective memory.
And this fully North Frisian sample's results I showed to Rothaer already in my email from 29 Apr 2020.
"unwillingness to share data you have"
I don't collect K13 data. And GEDmatch K13 stopped working after Christmas, and still doesn't work.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,631/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Don't play innocent, please. We are also not collecting only K13, this was just a start. Future goals include making of averages for other calculators, especially K36 and some others.
That's why kit numbers are inherently more valuable to share than naked K13 data.
People posting here know what you are like anyway. I conclude this topic now though.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,112/717 Given: 20,205/1,181 |
You actually did not want to exchange kit numbers, here is your rep comment:
I got kit numbers from Rothaer because he asked me to check how they compare to my K36 averages.
And Rothaer did not know about your mean and unpleasant reputation comment.
Me and Rothaer always (since year 2017) exchange also kit numbers, there is no problem with that...


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,631/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Yes, I don't have kit numbers but if I had I would not share them with you. Because it was not given to me and I am not authorized to share private information like that. Rothaer has the kit numbers, I deal with admixture values. And he shared with you west Prussian kit numbers, after which your DID NOT do the same, but you released just K13 values (of long promised samples) intentionally 10 minutes after averages were out.
I know you well, and I would not share anything with you even if I could, because I consider you to be in mala fides (bad faith). Plenty of past and present evidence to hold such views.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,112/717 Given: 20,205/1,181 |
To be honest, for Brieg Germans and Braunsberg German I have also raw data files, not only kit numbers.
And I checked their K13 values offline, from raw data files. GEDmatch does not work properly recently.
You keep bashing me that I did not check K13 values on 27-28 December when GEDmatch still worked, but I was busy with other things.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,631/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,631/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Dec 27
Than rothaer sent him several west Prussian kits he asked for, immediately and with kit numbers.
Dec 27
two days after, Dec 29
Of course he did not share any data on Dec 28, Dec 29, Dec 30 and Dec 31 either. No, he shared it yesterday (without kit numbers), minutes after we released German averages.
No more dealing with him. Amen.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,112/717 Given: 20,205/1,181 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks