0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 23,005/717 Given: 20,151/1,181 |
^^^
That's not what Sven told me, he said, quote: "she is a Sorb, but Sorbian culture was suppressed in this area [by Germanization]".
Even you did not strongly insist on calling that individual German back then. You have changed your mind after 3 years.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,464/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
There was only this academic one. Another user removed it, and now Stearsolina requested it to be added back to the sheet.
something like this:
I didn't want to update the average yet, because I feel these new averages are still weak, and using those regionally mixed academic samples feels more reliable.
It isn't so clear cut. Bosniaks from eastern Bosnia have some dialectal and genetic similarities with Sandžak. There is also a difference between eastern and western Sandžak, the latter has little Albanian influence and it should get it's own average when enough samples are connected.
Also, if we apply this criterium to the Bosniaks, it should be applied to all other averages in the sheet too. And the current sheet is made with respect to ethnic self-identification, not country borders, so it would require a lot of changing.
Most of the scientific papers on the population of B&H sample a lot of Sandžak Bosniaks living in Sarajevo, they shouldn't be taken as some measure of quality.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,868/149 Given: 444/392 |
Current Bosniak average is the one of Bosniaks from Bosnia, excluding Sandzak Bosniaks, so I don't know why should it be replaced back with the academic one, but I am not an expert on them as people from that region so I may be wrong.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
I've learned Sanzhak is not even part of BiH. I thought it was Southern BosniaHow are they "the future of the Bonsiaks", according to Varda?..
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,645/331 Given: 6,156/41 |
So called Sandžak is in southwestern Serbia and northern/northeastern Montenegro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandžak
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 116/4 Given: 218/6 |
Why is Canton Sarajevo added to the Southeast? Doesn't geographically makes more sense having it make Central Bosnian average with Srednjobosanski and Zeničko-Dobojski Canton; Tuzla Canton and other blue area making Northeast average; else is obviously divided between Northwestern and Southeastern average? Do we have enough samples to try something like this?
Historical_regions_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina.svg
Bosnia.regions.jpeg
Bosnia.AIPUB regions.jpg
I meant both Y-DNA and atDNA. In scientific and genetic genealogical samples we see a clear general difference between Bosniaks from BiH and Sandžak on both Y-DNA and atDNA. The latter population is not Bosniaks. Nobody when thinks about Bosniaks thinks about Sandžak. It is only confusing and misleading people. They became Bosniaks by ethnic identification only in recent history because of religious identification with ethnic identities in Western Balkans - Muslims became Bosniaks. In pre-Yugoslavian censuses, Sandžak Muslims were ethnically identified mostly as Albanians. We already have a kind of controversial chronology of identification of Muslim Bosniaks as Muslims and then as Bosniaks in BiH. The one with Sandžak Muslims is even more complex and adding it up only makes it harder instead of making genetic comparisons easier, it’s not pragmatic anyway.
The farthest regional and supraregional Croatian averages have a distance of 8.9 (Herzegovina-Northwest) and 6.0 (South-North) while from the Croatian national average 2.7 and 3.2.
The farthest regional Serbian averages have a distance of 3.9 (Herzegovina-Republika Srpska), 4.28 (South-Republika Srpska), or 7.1 (Montenegro-Republika Srpska) while from the Serbian national average of 1.7-2.3-4.9
"Bosniak_Sandžak" average has the farthest distance of staggering 13.2 from "Bosniak_Central_Northeast" and closest distance of only 7.06 from "Bosniak_Southeast" while from the Bosniak "old-new" national average of 9.8 - to "Albanian Gheg" is 8.89 and 9.84 to "Albanian". They are closer to Gheg Albanians than to Bosniaks from BiH. They are obviously not part of the same (Bosniak) ethnic population.
The population of the sanjak of Novi Pazar was ethnically and religiously diverse. In 1878-81, Muslim Slav muhacirs (refugees) from areas which became part of Montenegro, settled in the sanjak. As Ottoman institutions only registered religious affiliation, official Ottoman statistics about ethnicity do not exist. Austrian, Bulgarian and Serbian consulates in the area produced their own ethnographic estimations about the sanjak. In general, three main groups lived in the region: Orthodox Serbs, Muslim Albanians and Muslim Slavs (noted in contemporary sources as Bosnian or Herzegovinian Muslims). Small communities of Romani, Turks and Jews lived mainly in towns. The Bulgarian foreign ministry compiled a report in 1901-02. The five kazas (districs) of the sanjak of the Novi Pazar at that time were: Akova, Sjenica, Kolašin, Novi Pazar and Novi Varoš. According to the Bulgarian report, in the kaza of Akova there were 47 Albanian villages which had 1,266 households. Serbs lived in 11 villages which had 216 households.[53] The town of Akova (Bijelo Polje) had 100 Albanian and Serb households. There were also mixed villages - inhabited by both Serbs and Albanians - which had 115 households with 575 inhabitants. The kaza of Sjenica was inhabited mainly by Orthodox Serbs (69 villages with 624 households) and Bosnian Muslims (46 villages with 655 households). Seventeen villages had a population of both Orthodox Serbs and Bosnian Muslims. Albanians (505 households) lived exclusively in the town of Sjenica. The kaza of Novi Pazar had 1,749 households in 244 Serb villages and 896 households in 81 Albanian villages. Nine villages inhabited by both Serbs and Albanians had 173 households. The town of Novi Pazar had a total of 1,749 Serb and Albanian households with 8,745 inhabitants.[54] The kaza of Kolašin had 27 Albanian villages with 732 households and 5 Serb villages with 75 households. The administrative centre of the kaza, Šahovići, had 25 Albanian households. The kaza of Novi Varoš, according the Bulgarian report, had 19 Serbian villages with 298 households and "one Bosnian village with 200 houses".[55] Novi Varoš had 725 Serb and some Albanian households.[56]
The last official registration of the population of the sanjak of Novi Pazar before the Balkan Wars was conducted in 1910. The 1910 Ottoman census recorded 52,833 Muslims and 27,814 Orthodox Serbs. About 65% of the population were Muslims and 35% Serbian Orthodox. The majority of the Muslim population were Albanians. [57]
Sandžak is a very ethnically diverse region. Most Bosniaks declared themselves ethnic Muslims in 1991 census. By the 2002-2003 census, however, most of them declared themselves Bosniaks. There is still a significant minority that identify as Muslims (by ethnicity). There are still some Albanian villages (Boroštica, Doliće and Ugao) in the Pešter region.[58] There were a larger presence of Albanians in Sandžak in the past, however due to various factors such as migration, assimilation, along with mixing, many identify as Bosniaks instead.[18][59][60]
The Slavic dialect of Gusinje and Plav (sometimes considered part of Sandžak) shows very high structural influence from Albanian. Its uniqueness in terms of language contact between Albanian and Slavic is explained by the fact that most Slavic-speakers in today's Plav and Gusinje are of Albanian origin.[61]
Last edited by MoroLP; 01-18-2022 at 10:30 PM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,835/73 Given: 8,960/67 |
The issue is that some of the biggest Bosniak nationalists come from Sandžak. Surely at least 80% of them feel no different from their muslim brethern from Bosnia and considerably closer to them than to the neighbouring Serbo-Montenegrins and Albanians. The amount of people who identify as "Bosniak" instead of "Muslim" keeps dropping with every passing census. Heck, the best proof of how successful the assimilation process has been in that region is the very fact that their DNA project is being run by Sandžakians
And lastly, like everyone (but them) knows, the Bosniak ethnic identity is a modern-day invention that has an exclusive basis in islam. The same criteria that's applied to Serbs, Croats, Albanians, Bulgarians, etc. cannot be applied to them.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 3,464/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
I merged them that way to make use of them, because there's very few samples, less than 10 for each of these averages, but with some obvious regional differences.
When enough samples are collected, I would divide them this way:
Northern Bosnia (Usora and Soli)
Central Bosnia (usual definiton)
Eastern Bosnia (Sarajevo and Podrinje)
West Herzegovina
East Herzegovina
West Krajina
East Krajina
West Sandžak
East Sandžak
The west/east division used where there's evidence for different genetic clusters. for example, these are both Bosniaks from Herzegovina
this can hardly be the same genetic group, if yes, then these are extreme outliers in different directions.Code:a,26.17,23.06,19.93,9.86,16.80,1.88,0.15,0.26,0.35,0.01,1.54,0.00,0.00 b,22.27,34.00,17.38,5.81,15.60,2.77,0.00,0.42,1.00,0.32,0.00,0.41,0.00
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks