0





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,483/5 Given: 1,480/1 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,483/5 Given: 1,480/1 |
My friend was wondering, he got somthing called northern Greece and turkiye and it high lights all of northern Greece, is that maby his Thracian side of the family? But its a group under west asia?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,925/1 Given: 1,556/0 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,483/5 Given: 1,480/1 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,483/5 Given: 1,480/1 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,594/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |
My grandma sister results with very complex ancestry from Vojvodina (present-day northern Serbia - subregions Syrmia and Banat)
German (Hessen/Alsace) + Serb (Lika/Vojvodina) + likely Hungarian (Vojvodina/southern Hungary) + Greek (various, mainland mostly it seems)
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 8,459/56 Given: 8,713/5 |
MyHeritage has among the most dilettante results in the ancestry composition out of all companies, but what's actually good and essentially to be taken serious are the genetic groups. The groups are sometimes somewhat weirdly composed and you will have to thoroughly read what exactly they do mean (more detailed than the labels!). However, going back to a more rough approach, the visualisation of the groups seems to make pretty much sense to me.
Note that the "ethnicity estimate" and the genetic groups are in fact two completely different functions that have no connection to each other. Particularly, you can not project any percentages to the genetic groups. As you can see my five genetic groups pretty much depict and overlap in Germany while the "ethnicity" component responsible for that area - "North and West European" - is just assigned by 8.8% to me.
![]()
Last edited by rothaer; 10-05-2022 at 05:15 PM.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,202/1 Given: 5,005/0 |
Got my results right now:
https://i.imgur.com/bbbEXI7.png
ohMjXSv.png
6U6lUpv.png
Overall the results were Ok, not really bad to me, is kinda close to my Gedmatch and g25 results, but damn what a good genetics groups, exactly were my portuguese ancestors comes from!
imagem_2022-12-07_092219517.png
Distance: 1.3003% / 0.01300250 | R5P
44.6 Spanish_Canarias_Gran_Canaria_(Canarian)_o_(n=3)
28.8 Esan_(n=8)
14.4 Ronga_(n=3)
9.0 Egyptian_Arab_Muslim_Sharqia_(n=2)
3.2 Surui_(n=7)
Other ancestors y-DNA's: E-M81 (possibly E-PF2546), R-L52 (possibly R-L151)


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,506/13 Given: 25,115/5 |
I love my heritage for coincidences but the results came with High Italian and some northern european and the problem is that im the only with that High Italian at least the matches were good i have very close one in spain and Anglo Saxons from USA and few from italy from dad side





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,202/1 Given: 5,005/0 |
Yeah the N Italians samples which they have overlap a lot with Iberians
they should create a group for this, maybe called West-Med or Ibero-Italico for put Iberians, Sardinians and Italians all together like they do with NW Europe, i would be less confusing than iberians scoring a lot of Italian and Sardinian
Distance: 1.3003% / 0.01300250 | R5P
44.6 Spanish_Canarias_Gran_Canaria_(Canarian)_o_(n=3)
28.8 Esan_(n=8)
14.4 Ronga_(n=3)
9.0 Egyptian_Arab_Muslim_Sharqia_(n=2)
3.2 Surui_(n=7)
Other ancestors y-DNA's: E-M81 (possibly E-PF2546), R-L52 (possibly R-L151)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks