Who are more Australian: English-Australians or Australian Aboriginals?

[Scandal]

In USA, China, Hungary etc. the stereotypical Austrialian is a White man. That is the look people associate with Australia. That makes the White immigrants more Australian in my eyes. The Abo's were there earlier, but they had no concept of statehood. Modern Australian culture has much more to do with Anglo-Australians than with Aborigines.
I'd probably vote "both in equal measure" if that option existed.

[Mortimer]

To be honest probably whites I grew up with crocodile dundee being australian now there are many people also from asia

[PaganPoet]

Aboriginals.
My answer is closest to the "go back where you came from" mentality.

[Renekton]

English Australians

[Cristiano viejo]

True Australians are the descendants of all those criminals that were brought to Australia from UK.

The rest are just immigrants.

[Marshall Theodore]

English-Australians

[Mingle]

As Creoda was explaining you need to include the Celtic part of Australia. Ned Kelly would not be an English-Australian and he is possibly the most famous and iconic Australian character in history.

Okay. But to be fair, I didn't say that Englishmen were exclusively responsible for founding Australia.

[Mingle]

In USA, China, Hungary etc. the stereotypical Austrialian is a White man. That is the look people associate with Australia. That makes the White immigrants more Australian in my eyes. The Abo's were there earlier, but they had no concept of statehood. Modern Australian culture has much more to do with Anglo-Australians than with Aborigines.
I'd probably vote "both in equal measure" if that option existed.

Option's been added. But why vote for both in equal measure after making an argument that the English are more Australian?

[Peterski]

I voted both in equal measure.

What is important is that Aborigines own about 16% of all land in Australia which is a fair amount in my opinion, whereas in the USA all Indian reservations are only 2% of the US territory which is not enough in my opinion.

[Mingle]

I voted both in equal measure.

What is important is that Aborigines own about 16% of all land in Australia which is a fair amount in my opinion, whereas in the USA all Indian reservations are only 2% of the US territory which is not enough in my opinion.

Almost nobody lives in most of that land in Australia:
https://absstats.maps.arcgis.com/app...47fbd0203a3dec

Australia has much more sparsely populated and unpopulated land compared to USA, so not a proper comparison.