Final Realistic Iberian Calculator

[RyoHazuki]

People with any mixed NW/European or Eastern Euro heritage should adjust accordingly, mixed NW + Iberian comes closest to those Halstatt samples.

[Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas]

Target: LusoGF_Simulated
Distance: 5.0221% / 0.05022093
47.6 Proto-Celts
26.6 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
25.8 Imperial_Romans

Your girlfriend is not of Iberian descent or only partially based on these results. Am I right?

[Eurafricanid]

G25 inflates north African with the reference you're using... And on g25 in general due to ancestral nafri being so old it has issues. Hence why qpadm is a better solution. On ruderico's models I get 11% nafri exactly... Not sure what references he uses but head over to anthrogenica to ask him if you want. I believe you were wondering in pm.

I've updated the samples, so it should be much better now, I think, at least it was with the tests I did.

[Defcon2]

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

[Eurafricanid]

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

Are you a from western Spain? Berbers_&_Guanches seems too high, for a Catalan.

[Defcon2]

Are you a from western Spain? Berbers_&_Guanches seems too high, for a Catalan.

Yes, my parents are from Extremadura

[Gallop]

Target: Defcon2_scaled
Distance: 2.5717% / 0.02571702
38.6 Proto-Celts
28.2 Iberia_BA
22.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.4 Berbers_&_Guanches

22,8 Greeks-Colonies/Romans? que callado te lo tenías.

[Damião de Góis]

Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.6517% / 0.01651689
53.4 Proto-Celts
23.6 Iberia_BA
11.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.2 Berbers_&_Guanches

Replacing Gauls:


Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.4243% / 0.01424347
45.8 Gauls
26.4 Iberia_BA
13.2 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
10.2 Berbers_&_Guanches
4.4 Phoenicians_of_Iberia

Adding Visigoths:


Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.3910% / 0.01391002
33.0 Gauls
25.2 Iberia_BA
12.6 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.8 Visigoth
9.6 Berbers_&_Guanches
7.8 Phoenicians_of_Iberia

With everyone:

Target: Gil_Vicente
Distance: 1.3908% / 0.01390774
33.0 Gauls
25.4 Iberia_BA
13.0 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
11.4 Visigoth
9.8 Berbers_&_Guanches
7.0 Phoenicians_of_Iberia
0.4 Proto-Celts

So the fit gets better as i add populations. Of course "Gauls" doesn't make sense to me as a southern portuguese, so i suspect something similar might be missing, maybe west iberia IA celtic speaking samples.

[Mingle]

what? but im not using iberian germanics, im using 2 Iberians samples which lived before the settlers of Goths, showing that they alr are like modern iberians, showing that germaniics had a few impact

When other users add Visigoth though, they get some percentage from it. I don't think Goths had a significant impact, but maybe 5-10%, so worth including imo. And in the example you showed, the second sample is slightly more Germanic shifted.

[Jana]

There is Germanic autosomal admixture in Iberians (higher in west Iberia than east) and any model without Germanic proxy is thus inadequate.