Final Realistic Iberian Calculator

[Beowulf]

with some british samples:

Target: IvorixG25_Scaled
Distance: 1.8790% / 0.01879000
30.8 Proto-Celts
23.8 Britonnic
16.6 Pre-Proto-Celts
11.8 Berbers_&_Guanches
7.8 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
4.6 Iberia_BA
2.6 Anglo-Saxon
2.0 Phoenicians_of_Iberia

my distance is good usually with real coords i don't get down of 2,000 of distance

[Damião de Góis]

It seems G25 sometimes inflates some components, NA reaching 18% is absurd.

That's because it's also counting farmer, steppe and even WHG that the Guanche sample has:

Target: Portuguese
Distance: 3.0056% / 0.03005567
53.8 Anatolia_Barcin_N
29.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
10.8 WHG
5.6 MAR_Taforalt

Target: Canary_Islands_Guanche
Distance: 1.8774% / 0.01877371
34.8 MAR_Taforalt
27.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
16.0 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
7.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
5.2 Levant_PPNB
4.4 Yoruba
2.2 WHG
2.0 Dinka

Either way, if i run this calculator with the portuguese samples avaliable on G25, the average for NA is 8.6% and one individual scores 15% while another scores 1.6%. So if someone scores 18% it means he scores way above average.

(the image doesn't have all the samples, but at the bottom i could see the average for Guanche was 8.6%)

[Jingle Bell]

That's because it's also counting farmer, steppe and even WHG that the Guanche sample has:

Target: Portuguese
Distance: 3.0056% / 0.03005567
53.8 Anatolia_Barcin_N
29.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
10.8 WHG
5.6 MAR_Taforalt

Target: Canary_Islands_Guanche
Distance: 1.8774% / 0.01877371
34.8 MAR_Taforalt
27.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
16.0 Anatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
7.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
5.2 Levant_PPNB
4.4 Yoruba
2.2 WHG
2.0 Dinka

Either way, if i run this calculator with the portuguese samples avaliable on G25, the average for NA is 8.6% and one individual scores 15% while another scores 1.6%. So if someone scores 18% it means he scores way above average.

(the image doesn't have all the samples, but at the bottom i could see the average for Guanche was 8.6%)

So we should use more older Na samples which have no EEF?

[Beowulf]

So we should use more older Na samples which have no EEF?

i think that would be good but idk if there is older NA samples...

[Jingle Bell]

i think that would be good but idk if there is older NA samples...

Ik there some of Neolithic and Copper Age, i will test rn

[Eurafricanid]

So we should use more older Na samples which have no EEF?

No, because All of the NA samples from the Neolithic Age and after were "EEF" admixed

[Jingle Bell]

No, because All of the NA samples from the Neolithic Age and after were "EEF" admixed

Wait, u mean ENf = Natufian + Anatolian HG or EEF = ENF + WHG?

[Damião de Góis]

So we should use more older Na samples which have no EEF?

I think it's fine with Guanches, i was just explaining why everyone gets higher north african with the guanches sample.

[Eurafricanid]

Wait, u mean ENf = Natufian + Anatolian HG or EEF = ENF + WHG?

ENF. I just used the term EEF, because of your post, that's why I used the quotes.

[Beowulf]

my father's results:

Target: papaK13
Distance: 0.3448% / 0.00344763
36.4 Iberia_BA
28.2 Proto-Celts
19.8 Pre-Proto-Celts
10.0 Greeks_Colonies/Romans
3.8 Berbers_&_Guanches
1.2 Phoenicians_of_Iberia
0.6 Germanic_Ruler

he is the most iberian(with some N Italian) member in my family so his results would make more sense


mother:

Target: mama
Distance: 0.9399% / 0.00939867
21.2 Pre-Proto-Celts
19.6 Proto-Celts
17.2 Germanic_Ruler
12.4 Imperial_Romans
12.0 Britonnic
12.0 Iberia_BA
4.0 Phoenicians_of_Iberia
1.0 Berbers_&_Guanches
0.6 Greeks_Colonies/Romans

grandma:

Target: AbuelaG25
Distance: 0.8420% / 0.00842007
32.4 Proto-Celts
24.4 Pre-Proto-Celts
21.6 Germanic_Ruler
11.4 Phoenicians_of_Iberia
5.8 Imperial_Romans
4.4 Greeks_Colonies/Romans

grandfather:

Target: AbueloG25
Distance: 1.2765% / 0.01276468
26.6 Pre-Proto-Celts
24.6 Britonnic
23.4 Iberia_BA
12.6 Imperial_Romans
12.0 Germanic_Ruler
0.8 Berbers_&_Guanches