0



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 18,647/95 Given: 14,560/51 |
With Anatolian samples:
Target: Demirkazık
Distance: 2.1423% / 0.02142321
55.2 Anatolian
26.4 Turkic_Steppe
18.4 Balto-Slavic


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,736/168 Given: 12,391/176 |
Finnic component is totally wrong (there based on modern Udmurts who are mixed). In v2.5 version was used real ancient DNA from Iron Age Volga-Oka region. Also in that previous version several of Germanic samples were mixed. In this newest version is also added more purely Balto-Slavic samples.
Also East Med here is really east Med, Cypriot like Imperial Roman and clearly distinct from medieval pre-Slavic Balkan. Not sure what was used there, maybe same sample or maybe not.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 18,647/95 Given: 14,560/51 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7/0 Given: 11/0 |
Target: Tser_scaled
Distance: 1.6226% / 0.01622567
44.0 Balto-Slavic
40.2 Old_Balkan
12.8 East_Med
2.4 Keltic_Central_Euro
0.6 Volga_Basin


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 39/0 Given: 6/0 |
Target: WALKIRIATYR_simulated_g25_scaled
Distance: 1.4346% / 0.01434575
52.0 Keltic_Central_Euro
30.6 Old_Balkan
12.0 East_Med
5.0 Germanic
0.4 Turkic_Steppe



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,216/0 Given: 1,044/0 |
Target: KielGF
Distance: 1.7758% / 0.01775788
65.4 Balto-Slavic
11.8 Old_Balkan
10.8 Germanic
8.0 East_Med
3.8 Keltic_Central_Euro
0.2 Volga_Basin


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,736/168 Given: 12,391/176 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,736/168 Given: 12,391/176 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,736/168 Given: 12,391/176 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks