Mega QAPDM Models thread

[userNa]

Right, it's not African at all. It's his attempt to measure Basal Eurasian that's using Mbuti as a proxy. Using his model with his source populations and reference populations it's speculated that I have 24% basal eurasian admixture. I thought it was interesting. So, I decided to share it.

Andrei claims (unless I haven't understood his videos) that Basal Eurasian is a politically correct term for African admixture in Eurasians. Anyways, thanks for posting.

[Gannicus]

Andrei claims (unless I haven't understood his videos) that Basal Eurasian is a politically correct term for African admixture in Eurasians. Anyways, thanks for posting.

I think he has since changed his mind.

[Gannicus]

Anyways back to the more typical modeling. Using Xaviers references a few posts ago I modeled myself with 2 Iron age sources, Norway IA and Czechia IA Hallstatt.

Attachment 144728


Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0326% / 0.03258002
66.6 Czech_IA_Hallstatt
33.4 Norway_IA.SG

Attachment 144729


Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0326% / 0.03258002
66.6 Czech_IA_Hallstatt
33.4 Norway_IA.SG

Tried it with Austria IA La Tene with different references this time.







And this is what it looks like in G25:

Target: Gannicus_MergedFile_officialDavidski_scaled
Distance: 0.0309% / 0.03092630
55.0 Norway_IA.SG
45.0 Austria_IA_LaTene

[userNa]

That's me:
p value: 0.0954|Feasibility: TRUE
Greece_Peloponnese_N.AG_I5427.AG 56.5 +/- 9.25%
Iran_GanjDareh_N.AG_I1954.AG 22.96 +/- 4.60 %
Russia_Samara_HG.AG_I0124.AG 8.43 +/- 4.67 %
Russia_Ekven_OldBeringSea.AG_I7333.AG 2.48 +/- 2.35%
Jordan_PPNC.AG_I1699.AG 9.62 +/- 8.62%

[Gannicus]

That's me:
p value: 0.0954|Feasibility: TRUE
Greece_Peloponnese_N.AG_I5427.AG 56.5 +/- 9.25%
Iran_GanjDareh_N.AG_I1954.AG 22.96 +/- 4.60 %
Russia_Samara_HG.AG_I0124.AG 8.43 +/- 4.67 %
Russia_Ekven_OldBeringSea.AG_I7333.AG 2.48 +/- 2.35%
Jordan_PPNC.AG_I1699.AG 9.62 +/- 8.62%

Have you tried IA, BA, and Medieval yet?

[Xavier727]

Austria_IA_LaTene.AG + Denmark_IA.SG








slightly different reference set

[userNa]

Have you tried IA, BA, and Medieval yet?

I haven't managed to obtain a good model for BA and IA so far (standard error is too high).
I have a decent one for medieval though:


p value: 0.7524|Feasibility: TRUE|
Ukraine_Medieval_Rus.SG_VK541.SG 16.56 +/- 7.25%
Turkey_Marmara_Iznik_Basilica_Roman_Byzantine_A.AG_I8366.AG 79.06 +/- 11.67%
Egyptian.HO_Egypt7.HO 4.38 +/- 7.75%

[Gannicus]

Austria_IA_LaTene.AG + Denmark_IA.SG








slightly different reference set

I used your previous two reference lists:

[Gannicus]

I haven't managed to obtain a good model for BA and IA so far (standard error is too high).
I have a decent one for medieval though:


p value: 0.7524|Feasibility: TRUE|
Ukraine_Medieval_Rus.SG_VK541.SG 16.56 +/- 7.25%
Turkey_Marmara_Iznik_Basilica_Roman_Byzantine_A.AG_I8366.AG 79.06 +/- 11.67%
Egyptian.HO_Egypt7.HO 4.38 +/- 7.75%

might want to use ancient egyptians jk2134 and jk2911. Modern Egyptians have more SSA than their ancient ancestors.

Pooling the samples together might help too. Like this:

[Gannicus]

More with England MIA LIA