1


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 206/4 Given: 77/2 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,453/2 Given: 3,699/14 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,453/2 Given: 3,699/14 |
Same model with Loschbour WHG instead of Germany WHG:
The above result is from the first set of references in my post #392
This result is with Russia Steppe Eneolithic, Veretye EHG, and Latvia LN CordedWare removed from references:
Ignore the "attached thumbnails". The way this forum has users upload images is very clunky compared to others.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 206/4 Given: 77/2 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,453/2 Given: 3,699/14 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 360/0 Given: 175/0 |
My recent results of modern Czech samples, Polish, and for me. I reduced the amount of references which resulted in increased margins but i think in general the, results are okay
![]()
And Rights:
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,453/2 Given: 3,699/14 |
I also asked AndreiDNA for his take if he were to make a YouTube style video about my genome.
"This sample falls in the cluster of the typical modern British, however it has slight affinities to the Eastern Mediterranean due to excess Zagrosian, ANF, and even possible excess Natufian admixture. The east mediterranean element, if it is present, is very minor, in the single digit percentage. Gannicus also has strong affinities toward iron age Germanics and seems to be slightly more Germanic influenced than the average Englishman."
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks