3


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 434/0 Given: 618/0 |
G25/nMonte does not recover true ancestral composition. It only finds the best geometric fit of a target in PCA space using the source populations you give it. So if you model French people with ‘Celtic’, ‘Germanic’ and ‘Latin’ proxies, the result is just the best approximation within that reference set, not a biologically real breakdown of French DNA.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 434/0 Given: 618/0 |
This model does not work because nMonte is fitting French targets to the available ancient sources as a geometric best fit in PCA space, not recovering their true biological ancestry. A low distance only means the coordinates were approximated well with that source set; it does not validate the historical meaning of the components or make the solution uniquely true.”


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,445/8 Given: 4,578/11 |
“It is said that in his wars in Gaul he slew a million men and enslaved another million.”
— Plutarch, Parallel Lives (Life of Caesar)
Since the invasion of Gaul by Julius Caesar, France has undergone continuous and significant population changes driven by warfare, migrations, and long-term demographic shifts.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,336/12 Given: 24,888/5 |
Just wanted to try it myself for fun
Distance to: Beowulf_Scaled 0.01507079 French_Provence 0.01788330 French_Auvergne 0.02117303 French_Occitanie 0.02275743 Germany_West-Hallstattkreis_EIA(n=22) 0.02798532 French_Paris 0.02860025 BelgianC 0.02911618 French_Alsace 0.02981473 France_GrandEst_IA1.SG 0.03041336 French_Nord 0.03417109 French_South 0.03422303 French_Bigorre 0.03422925 French_Pas-de-Calais 0.03674948 French_Chalosse 0.03745202 French_Bearn 0.03769738 France_GrandEst_IA2.SG 0.04189232 French_Seine-Maritime 0.04359090 France_GrandEst_IA2 0.04510013 France_HautsDeFrance_IA2.SG


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,936/15 Given: 1,660/4 |
No genetic study concludes that; in fact, it's quite the opposite.
https://i.ibb.co/XxFN2QRX/image.png





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 17,352/194 Given: 8,200/117 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,936/15 Given: 1,660/4 |
France is one of the most "anti-Gaul" countries (in the true sense of the term: this heritage is the most denied and despised) as well as one of the most anti-racist. Most researchers are moderate, if not extreme, anti-racists. Why would these people want to admit a relative genetic continuity between Iron Age or Medieval populations and 21st-century French populations, when doing so goes against their own anti-racist and anti-Gaul dogmas?
It doesn't really make sense.
They didn't conclude this because it pleased them; that would be a misunderstanding of most French researchers (geneticists and others).
They analyzed various data sets and simply concluded that Roman/non-native contributions were not significant.
They didn't say there was zero % non-native contribution; they concluded it wasn't significant based on the various data sets from different periods in France.
What did you expect? Your analysis doesn't even take into account the political leanings (leftist) of most researchers (in this context, geneticists and anthropogeneticists); it is completely disconnected from reality.





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 17,352/194 Given: 8,200/117 |
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks