"it is so easy that a six-year-old girl can do it:"

https://i.imgur.com/17dvGFX.jpg

1. sort upper paleolithics from mediterraneans
   
2. check for reduction-level
   
3. and dinaricisation

https://i.imgur.com/Yw81v1l.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by providenje

Good post. You should make it a "sticky"

---

https://i.imgur.com/qvJJQVH.png

make your first choice:

https://i.imgur.com/5SuOTjQ.gif
https://i.imgur.com/cp1ItyO.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/RO7V6xD.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hannibal Lecter

yea, but you know.... :picard1:

---

if none of the skull-shapes
from the races of europe are appropriate

https://i.imgur.com/mD7Vhp5.jpg

perhaps, an expanded list of human sub-species
from the racialists' social contract published by richard mcculloch
would prove applicable?

Outline of Human Racial Classification:

SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA GROUP

1. Capoid or Khoisanid Subspecies of southern Africa
   1. Khoid (Hottentot) race
   2. Sanid (Bushmen) race
2. Congoid Subspecies of sub-Saharan Africa
   1. Central Congoid race (Geographic center and origin in the Congo river basin)
      1. Palaecongoid subrace (the Congo river basin: Ivory Coast, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroon, Congo, Angola)
      2. Sudanid subrace (western Africa: Niger, Mali, Senegal, Guinea)
      3. Nilotid subrace (southern Sudan; the ancient Nubians were of this subrace)
      4. Kafrid or Bantid subrace (east and south Africa: Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Natal)
      5. Bambutid race (African Pygmies)
   2. Aethiopid race (Ethiopia, Somalia; hybridized with Caucasoids)

"OUT-OF-AFRICA" GROUP

1. Australoid Subspecies
   1. Veddoid race (remnant Australoid population in central and southern India)
   2. Negritos (remnants in Malaysia and the Philippines)
   3. Melanesian race (New Guinea, Papua, Solomon Islands)
   4. Australian-Tasmanian race (Australian Aborigines)
2. Mongoloid Subspecies
   1. Northern Mongoloid racial group
      1. Northeast Asian race (various subraces in northern China, Manchuria, Korea and Japan)
      2. Ainuid race (remnants of aboriginal population in northern Japan)
      3. Tungid race (Mongolia and Siberia, Eskimos)
      4. Amerindian race (American Indians; various subraces)
   2. Southern Mongoloid racial group
      1. Southeast Asian race (various subraces in southern China, Indochina, Thailand, Myanmar [Burma], Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines, the last four partly hybridized with Australoids)
      2. Micronesian-Polynesian race (predominantly Southern Mongoloid partly hybridized with Australoids)
3. Caucasoid or Europid Subspecies
   1. Dravidic race (India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka [Ceylon]; ancient stabilized Indic-Veddoid [Australoid] blend)
   2. Turanid race (partially hybridized with Mongoloids; predominant element in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan; common in Hungary and Turkey)
   3. Indic or Nordindid race (Pakistan and northern India)
   4. Irano-Afghan race (predominant in Iran and Afghanistan, primary element in Iraq, common [25%] in Turkey)
   5. Armenid race (predominant element in Armenia and Azerbaijan, common in Syria, Lebanon and northern Iraq, primary element among the Ashkenazic Jews)
   6. Mediterranid racial group
      1. Orientalid or Arabid subrace (predominant in Arabia, major element from Egypt to Syria, primary in northern Sudan, important in Iraq, predominant element among the Oriental Jews)
      2. South Mediterranean or Saharid subrace (predominant in Algeria and Libya, important in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt, primary element among the Sephardic Jews, common element [circa 20-25%] in Spain, Sicily and southern Italy, minor element [circa 5%] in Greece)
      3. East Mediterranean or Pontid subrace (Black Sea coast of Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria; Aegean coasts of Greece and Turkey)
      4. Dinaricized Mediterraneans (Residual mixed types resulting from the blending of Mediterranids with Dinarics, Alpines or Armenids; not a unified type, has much regional variation; predominant element [over 60%] in Sicily and southern Italy, principal element in Turkey [35%], important element in western Syria, Lebanon and central Italy, common in northern Italy. The ancient Cappadocian Mediterranean subrace of Anatolia was dinaricized perhaps as early as the Neolitihic and is a major contributor to this type in modern Turkey.)
      5. West Mediterranean or Iberid subrace (Spain, Portugal, Corsica, Sardinia, and coastal areas of Morocco and Tunisia; the Atlanto-Mediterranean peoples who expanded over much of the Atlantic coastal regions of Europe during the Mesolithic period were a branch of this subrace)
   7. Ladogan race (named after Lake Ladoga; indigenous to Russia; includes Lappish subrace of arctic Europe)
   8. Dinaric race (predominant in western Balkans [Dinaric Mountains] and northern Italy, important in the Czech Republic, eastern and southern Switzerland, western Austria and eastern Ukraine. Its distribution in Europe, and that of its derived Dinaricized Mediterranean type, may be associated with the expansion of the Neolithic Anatolian farmers beginning circa 6,500 B.C.)
   9. Alpine race (predominant element in Luxembourg, primary in Bavaria and the Czech Republic [Bohemia], important in France, Hungary, eastern and southern Switzerland)
   10. Nordish or Northern European racial group (various subraces in the British Isles, Scandinavia, the Netherlands and Belgium; predominant element in Germany, Switzerland, Poland, Finland and the Baltic States; majority in Austria and Russia; important in France, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary)
       1. Inner Circle of Core or Central Subracial Types
          1. Aboriginal Northwest European subraces (The descendants of the first peoples to settle in northwest Europe, who retreated to refuge areas in southern France and northern Spain during the Last Glacial Maximum of 20,000-15,000 years ago [18,000-13,000 B.C.], and then re-expanded northward along the coasts of the Atlantic and the North Sea during the final phase of the Upper Paleolithic period circa 15,000-10,000 years ago [13,000-8,000 B.C.])
             1. Borreby subrace (named after Danish island site where paleolithic remains were found; principal element in Denmark, southwest coast of Sweden, northern Germany, the Rhineland and the Ruhr, majority element in Wallonia)
             2. Brünn subrace (named after paleolithic site near Brno, or Brünn, Czech Republic; predominant element in western Ireland)
          2. Nordic or Nordid subrace (The modern Nordic subrace is probably descended from an ancient blending of several proto-Nordic populations whose ancestors spent the Last Glacial Maximum in refuge areas in the Balkans and Ukraine -- the "Kurgan" or burial-mound people of the Ukraine, the "Corded-ware" pottery or battleaxe people of the southern Baltic region, and the "Danubian" or Linearband pottery Neolithic farmers of central Europe -- whose combination and expansion in northern Europe circa 5,500-2,000 B.C. is probably associated with the spread of Neolithic agriculture and the Indo-European language. The "Corded-ware" element is stronger in the Hallstatt Nordic type while the "Danubian" element is stronger in the Keltic Nordic type.)
             1. Hallstatt or Österdal type (named after Austrian site where remains were found and Norwegian valley near Oslo; predominant element in Sweden and southeastern Norway, common in Denmark, western Finland, eastern England and northern Germany)
             2. Keltic type (predominant element in Flanders, majority in the Netherlands and northern and western Switzerland, primary element in England, eastern Scotland and old Frankish country in southwest Germany, common in Wales and Ireland; ancient Franks and northern Kelts [the Germanokelten] were of this type which, despite its name, is perhaps most closely associated with the westernmost and southernmost of the ancient Germanic peoples and their descendants)
          3. Blended types of above subraces
             1. Anglo-Saxon or Old Germanic Reihengräber type (Nordic- Brünn blend; predominant element in the Dutch province of Friesland (Frisia) and the Dutch and German Frisian Islands, common in southeast England and northwest Germany)
             2. Trønder type (Brünn-Nordic blend; predominant element in Trøndelagen area of western Norway [whence the name] and Iceland, common in northeast England and Scotland)
             3. Fälish, Dalofalid or Dalo-Nordic type (Nordic-Borreby blend; names from Fälen [German for "plain"] and Dalarna region of Sweden (Kopparberg); primary element on the north German plain, Jutland and the Swedish province of Kopparberg)
       2. Outer Circle of Periphery Subracial Types
          1. Northwestern periphery types (ancient stabilized blends of Inner Circle or Central Nordish inhabitants of northwestern Europe with Atlanto-Mediterraneans who migrated from the Iberian peninsula up the Atlantic coast as far as Norway during the Mesolithic period circa 8,000-4,500 B.C. They entered Great Britain from the west coast whereas Nordic elements later entered from the east coast from northwest Europe.)
             1. North-Atlantid type (associated with megalithic monuments and long barrow burial sites; primary element in Wales, southeast coast of Ireland and western Scotland, common in England; in coloring commonly combines dark hair with light eyes)
             2. Palaeo-Atlantid type (common in Wales and in western England and Scotland from the Midlands to Glasgow, minor element in Norway; hair and eye coloring both dark)
          2. Southern and Eastern periphery types (ancient stabilized blends of Inner Circle Nordish types with neighboring Caucasoid races)
             1. Neo-Danubian type (eastern periphery blend of original Danubian and Kurgan proto-Nordics with Ladogan, with the Nordic element dominant; majority element in Poland and Belorussia, primary element in Hungary, west Ukraine and northwest Russia, important in Finland and the Baltic States)
             2. East Baltic type (northeast periphery blend of Borreby and/or Fälish with Neo-Danubian and/or Ladogan; majority element in Finland and the Baltic States, formerly predominant in Old Prussia, but this element now dispersed throughout Germany as a result of the post-war expulsion of the Prussian population from its ancestral homeland)
             3. Noric or Sub-Nordic type (southern periphery blend of Nordic with Alpine and/or Dinaric, with the Nordic element dominant; principal element in northern France, important element in central Germany and Austria, common in Transylvania and western Ukraine, minor in British Isles)

*

seems foolish to adults
because one simply cleans up the mess
and buys more milk.

if governmental regulations change
before an investment manifests a profit,
one draws more money from the bank and starts over.

if a partner moves on,
one simply finds an other.

but,
there is no "time-store" or "time-bank";
one can not "find" any replacement
for lost or wasted time - consequently -

instead of watching the television
or engaging in any other synthetic experience

ein ~spieler might enjoy exercising his mind
while improving the lifes
of the less-advanced

by protein-folding with the girl-child - untill -
she asked "Why?" and my son realised
she would only accept a technique
that directly applied to optimising her gene-suite -

my son pulled this philosophy wall-chart down
on to the floor
and asked her to point out the "strong bonds"
which they folded together

and - then - the "weak bonds" to form an extremely irregular polyhedral solid
and re-kindle their discussion of philosophy.

a few days later,
he presented his first mobile
to further their conversation of anthropological classification:

huxley's schema

1. ULOTRICHI (wooly hair)
   1. Bushmen
   2. Negritos
   3. Negroes
   4. Mincopies
2. LEIOTRICHI (smooth hair)
   1. Amphinesians
   2. Americans
   3. Xanthochroi (lighter-pigmented Europids)
   4. Melanochroi (darker-pigmented Europids)
   5. Australians
   6. Esquimaux
   7. Mongolians

http://youtu.be/O0VKpmsj1nA

*

he presented her with an other mobile:

sergi's schema from Origine e diffusione della stirpe mediterranea

1. EurAsiatic (all brachycephalic Europid types)
   1. Semitic people
   2. Aryans
2. EurAfrican (all dolichocephalic Europid types)
   1. Hamites
   2. Mediterranean race
      1. Libyans or Berbers
         1. Ancient Egyptians
      2. Ligurians
      3. Pelasgians
      4. Iberians
   3. Nordic race

*

my son and the girl-child
continued exploring the trend initiated by topinard:

hair-texture and nose-shape in

deniker's schema from the races of man: an outline of anthropology and ethnography

1. WOOLLY HAIR (Eriocomi^Haeckel), BROAD NOSE
   1. Yellow skin
      steatopygous
      short stature
      dolichocephalic
      1. Bushmen (s. r. Hottentots and Bushmen) 1
   2. Dark Skin
      1. Reddish-brown skin
         very short stature
         sub-brachycephalic or sub-dolichocephalic
         1. Negrito (s. r. Negrillo and Negrito)
      2. Black skin
         tall stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Negro (s. r. Nigritian and Bantu)
      3. Brownish-black skin
         medium stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Melanesian (s. r. Papaun and Melanesian)
2. CURLY OR WAVY HAIR (Lophocomi^Haeckel)
   1. DARK SKIN
      1. Reddish-brown skin
         narrow nose
         tall stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Ethiopean 5
      2. Chocolate-brown skin
         broad nose
         medium stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Australian 6
      3. Brownish-black skin
         broad or narrow nose
         short stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Dravidian 7
            1. Platyrrhine
            2. Leptorrhine
   2. Skin of tawny white
      narrow hooked nose with thick top
      brachycephalic
      1. Assyrioid 8
3. WAVY BROWN OR BLACK HAIR (Cymotrichi - Euplocomi^Haeckel), DARK EYES
   1. Skin clear brown
      black hair
      narrow/straight/convex nose
      tall stature
      dolichocephalic
      1. Indo-Afghan 9
   2. Skin Tawny White
      Black Hair
      1. Tall stature
         elongated face
         1. Aquiline nose
            prominant occiput
            dolichocephalic
            elliptical form of face
            1. Arab or Semite 10
         2. Straight course nose
            dolichocephalic
            square face
            1. Berber 11
               • Djerba (short stature, globular head)
               • Elleas (dolichocephalic, broad face)
               • dolichocephalic Berber sub-race (above average stature, narrow face)
               • Jerid or Oasis type (lofty stature, dark complexion)
         3. Straight fine nose
            mesocephalic
            oval face
            1. Littoral European (Atlanto-Mediterranean) 12
               • Northwestern (dark-haired western irish)
      2. Short stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Ibero-Insular 13
   3. Skin Dull White, Brown Hair
      1. Short stature
         strongly brachycephalic
         round face
         1. Western European 14
      2. Tall stature
         brachycephalic
         elongated face
         1. Adriatic (Dinaric) 15
            1. Sub-Adriatic (slightly shorter, slightly less brachycephalic and blonder -
               derived from a blend of Dinaric with Sub-Nordic)
4. FAIR WAVY OR STRAIGHT HAIR (Euthycomi^Haeckel), LIGHT EYES
   1. Skin Reddish White
      Hair Flaxen
      1. Somewhat wavy reddish hair
         tall stature
         dolichocephalic
         1. Nordic 16
            1. Sub-Nordic (mesocephalic, square face, turned-up nose -
               east of the Baltic and in northern Germany)
      2. Somewhat straight flaxen-haired
         short stature
         sub-brachycephalic
         1. Eastern European (R. Orientale - eastern Slavs and Finns) 17
            1. Vistulan (shorter stature and mesocephalic)
5. STRAIGHT OR WAVEY HAIR, DARK/BLACK EYES
   1. Skin Light Brown
      very hairy body
      broad and concave nose
      dolichocephalic
      1. Ainu 18
   2. Skin Yellow
      smooth body
      1. Prominent nose (sometimes convex)
         tall stature
         elliptical form of face
         brachy- or meso-cephalic
         1. Polynesian 19
      2. Short stature
         flattened (sometimes convex) nose
         prominent cheek-bones
         lozenge-shaped face
         dolichocephalic
         1. Indonesian 20
      3. Short stature
         prominent straight or concave nose
         meso- or dolicho-cephalic
         1. South American (s. r. Paleo-American & South American) 21
6. STRAIGHT HAIR (Lissotrichi^Haeckel)
   1. Warm yellow skin
      1. Straight or aquiline nose
         1. Tall stature
            mesocephalic
            1. North American (s. r. Atlantic and Pacific) 22
         2. Short stature
            brachycephalic
            1. Central American 23
      2. Straight nose
         tall stature
         brachycephalic
         square face
         1. Patagonian 24
   2. Brownish-yellow skin
      short stature
      round flattened face
      dolichocephalic
      1. Eskimo 25
   3. Yellowish-white skin
      1. Turned-up nose
         short stature
         brachycephalic
         1. Lapp 26
      2. Straight or concave nose
         short stature
         meso- or dolicho-cephalic
         projecting cheek-bones
         1. Ugrian (s. r. Ugrian and Yeniseian) 27
      3. Straight nose
         medium stature
         strongly brachycephalic
         1. Turkish or Turco-Tatar
   4. Pale yellow skin
      Projecting cheek-bones
      Mongoloid eyes
      slightly brachycephalic
      1. Mongol (s. r. Northern and Southern) 29

*

important notice - for best viewing:
https://i.imgur.com/WyKwa5s.png

my son spent less than sixty seconds
with a crayon on one of our windows
to draw

czekanowski's race-diagram:

https://i.imgur.com/45YAysb.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/eHdLrC2.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/ppt2YLs.png
https://i.imgur.com/D57jL7p.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/hNPZgqU.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/jzynkQ7.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/BDRnqMg.png
https://i.imgur.com/3NuPJqy.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/eq6LDX8.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/Wg1CEVl.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/SOmV9pA.png
https://i.imgur.com/rW6sXP9.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/u15nxzB.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/JLok4Bg.png

which led to a brief review of sergi's "EurAfrican" ligurians:

Quote:

---

In the Neolithic and Bronze Age, stilt-house settlements were common in the Alpine and Pianura Padana (Terramare) region.[4] Remains have been found at the Ljubljana Marshes in Slovenia and at the Mondsee and Attersee lakes in Upper Austria, for example.

---

and a discussion of the relative stability
(considering the divers pheno-types
manifest within each familial generation)
of the "blended" varieties

and the environmentally modified sub-species
(alpinisation/borealisation/dinaricisation/neotenisation),

particularly those bearing ancient gene-clusters
so tightly associated as to be regarded as dominant
if not inseparable

and their estimations of the required number of back-crossings
(based on typical gene-loci and affinity)
to cluster and stabilise the relevant genes
of the more ephemeral sub-varieties.

soon my son and the girl-child
were waving their von luschan/fischer-saller/martin-schultz flash-cards
(with the attributing genes detailed on the back of each card)
and praising the new standards of the eugenics-fiends
(acknowledging advancements in genetics
and matching the requirements of other registered breeds
of plants and animals)

that require any applicant
for registry as a certified purebred

provide a pedigree
of a mother and father manifesting the same pheno-type
and conforming to established taxonomical standards

and demonstrating a stable pheno-type

over a minimum of three generations for females
and four generations for males.

non-pedigreed individuals
of obvious standard pheno-types
may register for up-breeding (to stablise their geno-type)

with the ultimate goal
of establishing a line of pedigree
for future generations.

while she was occupied
poring over her gene-maps
and applying her experience breeding rabbits/chickens/goats
to fine-tune her calculations,

my son (knowing she is unexposed to evil)
took me aside and began explaining how multiculturalism
had laid the foundation for racial preservationism.

https://i.imgur.com/lF6yuIQ.png

*

https://i.imgur.com/Vm8mciC.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/u7leimb.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/gDrXv9g.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/u7leimb.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/lMkPLSz.png

being home-schooled on a farm
where his mother, her girl-friend and i
cultivate edible flowers
and varietal/heirloom fruits/vegetables,

it seemed a natural progression - when
my son extended his stewardship to endangered breeds of livestock/poultry.

we have many small pastures on our farm
(for rotational grazing)
and many slightly larger food-plots
on the white-tail ranch

in which to keep separate flocks/herds.

phillip sponenberg is one of the many authors
in my son's library of reference-books.

on our personal Παρνασσός
the girl-child (naturally) emulates my relationship with my plants
and my son's with the animals.

she has done this from such an early age
that the knowledge is automatic.

she studies the many sub-varieties of humans
and contemplates their stewardship.

it seems obvious to her
that the more evolved human
should ensure the habitat of all the specialised breeds
of plants and animals.

my son encouraged her with a mobile
of many hooks from which to dangle her flash-cards.

1. Subspecies
   1. Series
      1. Varieties
         1. Subvarieties

von eickstedt's schema from Rassenkunde und Rassengeschichte der Menschheit

1. Homines sapientes albi
   1. Homines sapientes albi xanthochroici Blond race belt
      1. Homo sapiens europaeus
         1. Homo sapiens europaeus nordicus
         2. Homo sapiens europaeus dalofaelicus
         3. Homo sapiens europaeus finnus
      2. Homo sapiens slavonicus (intermedius)
   2. Homines sapientes albi melanochroici Brown race belt
      1. Homo sapiens pelagius (meridionalis)
         1. Homo sapiens pelagius mediterraneus
         2. Homo sapiens pelagius eurafricanus
         3. Homo sapiens pelagius atlanticus
      2. Homo sapiens arabicus
      3. Homo sapiens indicus
         1. Homo sapiens indicus indogracilis
         2. Homo sapiens indicus indoafghanus
         3. Homo sapiens indicus indobrachimorphus
      4. Homo sapiens occidentalis
         1. Homo sapiens occidentalis polinesianus
         2. Homo sapiens occidentalis carolinensis (Micronesid)
   3. Homines sapientes albi brachimorphi Mountain race belt
      1. Homo sapiens alpinus
         1. Homo sapiens alpinus cevenolicus
         2. Homo sapiens alpinus lappo
      2. Homo sapiens dinaricus
      3. Homo sapiens syriacus
      4. Homo sapiens eurasicus
         1. Homo sapiens eurasicus turanicus
         2. Homo sapiens eurasicus pamiriensis
   4. Homines sapientes albi protomorphi Old-Europids
      1. Homo sapiens veddalis
         1. Homo sapiens veddalis ceylonensis
         2. Homo sapiens veddalis gondicus
         3. Homo sapiens veddalis malicus
         4. Homo sapiens veddalis toala
         5. Homo sapiens veddalis siamesis
      2. Homo sapiens curilanus
2. Homines sapientes leiotrichi
   part a: Homo sapiens asiaticus
   1. Homines sapientes asiatici arctici Polar belt
      1. Homo sapiens hyperboreus
         1. Homo sapiens hyperboreus ugrianus
         2. Homo sapiens hyperboreus palaeasiaticus
      2. Homo sapiens groenlandus
   2. Homines sapientes asiatici badii
      1. Homo sapiens tatarus
      2. Homo sapiens sinicus
         1. Homo sapiens sinicus borealis
         2. Homo sapiens sinicus medius
         3. Homo sapiens sinicus meridianus
   3. Homines sapientes asiatici meridionalis (South-Mongolids)
      1. Homo sapiens palaemongolicus
         1. Homo sapiens palaemongolicus palaunicus
         2. Homo sapiens palaemongolicus nesidus
   4. Homines sapientes subnigri
      1. Homo sapiens hottentotus
         1. Homo sapiens hottentotus austroafricanus
         2. Homo sapiens hottentotus huzuana
3. Homines sapientes leiotrichi
   part b:Homo sapiens americani
   1. Homines sapientes americani cuprei
      1. Homo sapiens pacificus
      2. Homo sapiens centralis
      3. Homo sapiens colombicus
         1. Homo sapiens colombicus planidus
         2. Homo sapiens colombicus apalacidus
      4. Homo sapiens marginalis
   2. Homines sapientes americani mesembrini (South-Indianids)
      1. Homo sapiens andinus
      2. Homo sapiens patagonus
      3. Homo sapiens brasilianus
      4. Homo sapiens lagoanus
      5. Homo sapiens lagol-maritimus
         1. Homo sapiens lagol-maritimus fuegidus
         2. Homo sapiens lagol-maritimus huarpidus
4. Homo sapientes afri
   1. Homines sapientes europoafri Contact belt
      1. Homo sapiens africanus
         1. Homo sapiens africanus nuba (North-Ethiopid)
         2. Homo sapiens africanus abessomalis (East-Ethiopid)
         3. Homo sapiens africanus massaicus (South-Ethiopid)
         4. Homo sapiens africanus saharicus (Central-Ethiopid)
         5. Homo sapiens africanus maurusianus (West-Ethiopid)
      2. Homo sapiens indomelanicus
         1. Homo sapiens indomelanicus karnaticus
         2. Homo sapiens indomelanicus kolidus
   2. Homines sapientes cafro-madegassi (West-Negrids)
      1. Homo sapiens niger
      2. Homo sapiens niloticus
      3. Homo sapiens cafer
      4. Homo sapiens palaeniger
   3. Homines sapientes alfuri (East-Negrids)
      1. Homo sapiens papuensis
      2. Homo sapiens melaninus
      3. Homo sapiens australasicus
   4. Homines sapientes pygmaei
      1. Homo sapiens akkalis
      2. Homo sapiens negrito
         1. Homo sapiens negrito philippinensis
         2. Homo sapiens negrito semang
         3. Homo sapiens negrito mineopaeus

https://i.imgur.com/qwWnrTh.png

*

...from a web-site
that was inspired by carleton coon's book:

https://i.imgur.com/58msrEp.png

Quote:

---

10 Golden Rules

The rules stated below apply to over 90% of classifications of European-descended individuals. They are the conclusion of my experience in classifying such persons and have been proved to work in nearly all cases. The purpose is to help classifiers and contribute to accuracy.

When classifying individuals of European descent:

1. The first distinction to be made is whether the person in question is Mediterranean or Upper Paleolithic in type. As a rule of thumb Upper Paleolithic types are commoner in most of Europe. Mediterraneans become more common towards the South. Expect an Upper Paleolithic type (or a local subvariant of an UP type) and pay attention for Mediterranean exceptions.
   
2. 50/50 blends are rare. In most cases, the individual belongs to a certain type (or a local variant of some type) with possible alteration by other type, but not to the extent to which the elements in the blend are indiscernible.
   
3. Don’t expect everyone to be a typical example of a given category. Also don’t assume that not having a “typical” appearance implies admixture of a different element. Specially Upper Paleolithic types are spread throughout Europe in many different local subvariants.
   
4. Be skeptic about blends of similar elements. A Bruenn-Phalian or Mediterranean-Nordic intermediate is unlikely if considering the morphological similarities and overlaps between these types.
   
5. Demand the subject’s ancestry for classification. Though in theory classification should be independent of the place of origin, there is almost never sufficient material for complete accuracy. Knowing a person’s background usually points in the right direction. Consider the racial history and principal elements of the given country(ies) the subject descends from and ask yourself whether the person in question cannot be explained as a product of these.
   
6. Don’t classify on impression. An assessment on the physical type of a person is only valuable if it considers morphological traits. Stereotypes and pigment should not influence classifiers. Some stereotypes, like the “Irish” lip, have some morphological value while others like the blonde robust “Nordic” German do not. Do not mistake “Northern European” or “Germanic” with “Nordic” for example.
   
7. Think in terms of morphology, not absolute tags. Words are insufficient when describing appearances. The most important consideration is whether the group of features which corresponds to a type is present in a given person. Most Europeans could be described as possessing a “narrow” nose, many as having a “long” face, but it does not imply belonging to any type in particular. Pictures, not words.
   
8. If in doubt, bet UP. Following rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. UP types have remarkable internal variability and comprehend most of Europe’s population. If the individual in question does not seem to be an easy case, or looks somehow “local”, one should begin investigating whether he or she is an UP type. Mediterraneans vary less in appearance than Upper Paleolithics. European variability is largely UP variability. It is the differences beween the UP types that make the distinction between countries. Mediterraneans only exist as an exception to the UP rule.
   
9. No more than 3. Most European individuals could be said to belong to at most 3 different visible types. This is specially the case for Western Europe. Time has not yet permitted the formation of more complex blends.
   
10. Morphology > Metrics. It is possible to find individuals of Upper Paleolithic affiliation who conform to a Mediterranean type from a metrical viewpoint. The correct approach when classifying someone is to find persons with similar facial features who have previously been taxonomised. No pictures hurt: the more material one can assemble, the better. The more resemblances you can establish and remember, the better prepared you will be for future subjects. Classifications are analogical not digital.

---

~addendum~
many questions regarding this post
could be answered by an evening spent reading carleton coon's book.

to down-load your copy - click here:

https://i.imgur.com/cGsya1V.png

~addendum - tardy
because the received plain-text file
deserved the appropriate bracket-commands.

in a display of the eurasia-spanning-brotherhood
which "unites" nordic and jakunin racial elites - the diagram (below)
was considerately provided by ein ~spieler: マシン内のゴースト - a child of amaterasu
who embraces the political device

supported by hitler's orientalist
to justify the drang nach osten>ostsiedlung>lebensraum
promised in the second volume of mein kampf.

if they had adhered to that program
and moved east - instead of west
and japan moved west to meet them - instead of east
or south... :tsk:

Quote:

---

1. Neanderthal - Neanderthals are hominids that inhabited Europe and Asia in considerable numbers during the Pleistocene. Although rare in their pure form, Coon´s proposition is they have mixed with the Sapiens giving birth to the Upper Paleolithic types, that constitute one of the two biggest divisons of modern Whites. Their forehead are short and sloping , the chin much less developed with a smaller distance between the lower teeth and the chin. The nose is broad and low, the mouth big and exposed, the cheekbones as well as all bones are heavy and the hair rufous. Neanderthals are easy to recognize by their well marked browridges and short, sloping foreheads, this can be seen in all the examples. The hair is rufous and their upper lip curved upwards. The bones are fuller and the mouth is bigger and broader. All these features will be inherited in Upper Paleolithic survivors.
2. Upper Paleolithic Survivors - European and Middle Eastern types of Cro-Magnon like affiliation. Coon proposed that their differentiation from Mediterraneans could have ultimately been the result of mixture with Neanderthals. In this regard Coon states of ancient UP crania :”On the whole, the Upper Palaeolithic group, including Predmost #3, is intermediate between the Galley Hill-Combe Capelle type and the Neanderthals, as known to us from the European Neanderthaloid group. In the first place, the horizontal circumference, taken above the browridges, ranges from 538 to 563 mm. in male Neanderthals. The Upper Palaeolithic means is 549.1 mm., the individual figure of Predmost #3 is 556, that of Combe Capelle, 527 mm., which would be nearer a modern dolichocephalic mean. In face breadth, the Neanderthal figure is represented by La Chapelle aux Saints With 152 mm., and the Le Moustier adolescent with 148 mm. The Upper Palaeolithic mean is 142.8 mm., Predmost #3 is 144 mm., and Combe Capelle 137 mm. Again, Combe Capelle represents modern European man, and the Upper Palaeolithic group takes an intermediate position. The same intermediate position is found in a number of other characters, including the vault breadth and height, the minimum frontal diameter, the widths of the orbits, and the distance between the orbits. In individual cases, such as Predmost #3, the upper face height is intermediate also, but in the group as a whole it is not, for the shorter dimension prevails. The same is true of the nasal dimensions in which Upper Palaeolithic man is not perceptibly Neanderthaloid. The cranial lengths of the Upper Palaeolithic group are no greater than those of Combe Capelle and Galley Hill; in fact, frequently shorter. The reason for this may be that the equivalent Neanderthaloid diameter includes the browridges, which, when eliminated, make the brain length somewhat less than that of Galley Hill.” Regardless of their origin, these types have been proved to have inhabited Europe and certain parts of Asia since the last Ice Age.
   1. Unreduced UPs - Unreduced UP survivors are the mostly unaltered descendants of Upper Paleolithic hunters and gatherers of the Ice Age. Today their main concentration is in northern Europe, with some importance in central Europe and North Africa. They are all characterized by heavy browridges and both large and broad heads giving them bigger heads than either Mediterraneans or Alpines. Unreduced UPs are recognizable by their fuller jaws and cheekbones, often a high and big vault is characteristic and the jaw is of a clifted type. As can be observed in the comparison above, the upper face and nose are larger than those of reduced UPs which often gives unreduced UPs a somewhat “Mediterranean” (this is specially true for some Faelids and Bruenns) aspect from an Alpine viewpoint. Unreduced UPs are larger and fuller in all regards when compared with reduced UPs like Alpines.
      1. Tydal - A partly reduced and dark UP type similar to the Bruenn, first noted in Tydal in Tronderlag, Norway by Halfdan Bryn. Similar individuals were later observed elsewhere in Scandinavia. Tydals are darker, often somewhat snub-nosed, and smaller when compared with Bruenns. The type is more rounded-faced and has an infantile aspect to to it.
      2. Faelid - Faelids are unreduced UPs commonest in the northwestern German plain and surrounding territories. The term “Faelid” used here is a variant of “Phalian” or “Fälisch” and refers to this type originally identified by Hans Günther. Morphologically the type is closer to Bruenns than to Borreby types and represents an essentially unaltered UP survival. Like Bruenns, the type is large headed and large faced, but the face of Bruenns is flatter. The eyes are characteristically deep set and the browridges are noticeably marked. The Faelid eyes often have a characteristic slit and the chin often appears small for the big and exposed mouth.
         1. Västmanlandstyp - A reduced Faelid type typical of certain regions of Sweden identified by Bertil Lundman. Essentially Faelid by features but with lesser skeletal proportions, often with a somewhat concave nose. The form is as expected from reducing a Faelid.
      3. Bruenn - Bruenns are essentially unaltered UP survivals indigenous to northern Europe, in particular Ireland and the British Isles, with few spots in Scandinavia and Frisia. Morphologically the type is large and comparable to Faelids. The name was coined by Coon for its association with crania found in the Czech city of Brünn. The upper lip looks turned upwards with furrows between it and the lower lip and the mouth is big. The first example has a clifted jaw typical of this type. The nose is often somewhat straight and large, but unlike Faelids the face is flatter. The orbits are characteristically square and so is often the face.
      4. Phalian-Borreby - As noted, Phalian represents the core Upper Paleolithic type of most Germanic populations. There exists, however, a great deal of variability (mostly due to reduction) between its most typical form and its Borreby derivate. This new “Phalian-Borreby” taxon attempts to address this spectrum, and is judged more appropriate than Lundman’s Västmanland (which is included) as it must comprise more than a local subtype. Facial features remind of Phalians but with lesser skeletal proportions, often with a somewhat concave nose. The form is as expected from reducing a Phalian. Represents in all regards a transition from Phalian to Borreby.
   2. Partially Reduced
      1. Borreby - Borreby types are relatively unreduced UPs commonest in Denmark and southern Scandinavia. The type is somewhat reduced and smaller if compared with Faelids or Bruenns. Its name was coined by Carleton Coon because he believed the type to be representative of crania found in the Danish village of Borreby.
      2. Baltic - Through a certain degree of reduction, UPs in Eastern Europe closer but not limited to the Baltic area acquired characteristic morphological types.
         1. East Baltic - East Baltics will be called in this site the types combining Eastern Europeans Upper Paleolithic survivors with incipiently or partly Mongoloid types such as Uralics, Ladogans or Lapps and occasionally Nordics as well. Baltic/Eastern UPs + Uralic/Ladogan/Lapp = East Baltics. The East Baltic spectrum comprises from Eastern Germany, Finalnd and the Baltic countries to most of Western Russia. But individuals combining these ingredients or part of them are common in most of the Slavic world.
      3. Southern Upper Paleolithic Survivors - In Southern and Central Europe, darker and smaller Upper Paleolithics related to Bruenns occur. It is possible that the reduciton of many of these types, gave origin to an important proportion of the European Alpines. Smaller than other UPs, with lesser skeletal proportions and often a rounder face.
      4. Eastern Upper Paleolithic Survivors - In Eastern Euorpe, Upper Paleolithics similar in general terms to Phalians occur. Compared to Phalians, Eastern UPs appear less “extreme” featured and smaller and shorter faced, with a broader lower lip. The cheekbones appear “pudgier” and the nose tip, often slightly upturned, has a characteristic triangular shape.
   3. Reduced UP types, the most important numerically being the
      1. Alpine - Alpines are reduced Upper Paleolithic survivors. They usually differ from other UP survivors for having rounder faces and infantile, smaller features. They often lack the excess of skeletal proportions of other UP types and are smaller and shorter headed. Some will be seen to inherit morphologies more typical of unreduced UPs such as more prominent jaws or stronger browridges. Originally the name was coined for its central European population distribution (near the Alps), but individuals of comparable types may actually be found in a much larger territorial area. Alpines are easy to recognize by their infantile features and round faces. The cheekbones are usually less full than either UPs or Mediterraneans, but the chin is still prominent and clifted in a characteristically UP way. They are often snub nosed (specially the females) like the Armenian and their vault is short but a certain dinaric-like nasal prominence is also common among men. The eyes and mouth appear big for the face and their bones are smaller than those of other UP survivors.
3. Mediterraneans - the European and Middle Eastern types of Aurignacian affiliation. Although many Mediterranean subtypes are present, several generalizing remarks can be made of all of them vis à vis the Upper Paleolithic types. Carleton Coon describes the Mediterranean: “A Mediterranean is a white man of variable stature - as whites go, usually short to medium; his bones are light, but strongly marked for muscle attachments if these muscles have been well developed through use. His legs are relatively long compared to his trunk, and his hands and feet rather small. His chest is relatively flat, his neck of medium length, his head of medium size, long-oval in shape with parallel sides; his face is small and delicate, with only slight bony ridges over the eyes. The upper part of his face is large in proportion to the lower part, so that when he is old his nose looks large for his jaw. Of all human being the Mediterranean has the most human, the most highly evolved, masticatory apparatus. His teeth are small, and so are the muscles that operate his jaw. His face is narrow, and his nose consequently is often prominent when compared to the lower-bridged and flatter noses of wider or longer-jawed races in Europe and other parts of Africa and Asia. The Mediterranean man is a relatively hairy fellow. His head is covered with a heavy growth of straight, wavy, or ringleted hair, usually fine in texture; rarely does the true Mediterranean go bald. His eyebrows are full, often meeting over the nose. His beard develops throughout adult life. While it is not the heaviest beard of all mankind, it is often a close runner-up. His body hair also increases throughout life and individually varies greatly in quantity.” Mediterraneans are numerically important in the Middle East and Arabia, the region Coon called the ”cradle” of the Mediterranean race. In Europe, virtually all Mediterranean types are descended from neolithic farmers that entered around –3000 via 3 main routes: 1-Via Gibraltar , like most of the Small Mediterraneans 2-By sea, like the Atlanto Mediterraneans (hence their name) 3- From the Caucasus and the East, like the Cordeds and the Danubians
   1. Small Mediterraneans - called by Coon “Small Mediterraneans”( smaller, more gracile, less bony, shorter nosed and shorter) . They include the Mediterraneans from Arabia as well as some Iberians and other subtypes. Earnest Hooton interpreted them to be reduced derivatives of either Atlanto Mediterraneans or Irana-Afghans. If true, then in Europe the Small Mediterraneans may be limited to the former explanation. Shorter-faced than the Large Mediterraneans. The musculature is less marked and the look is of a more gracile type. They overlap with Atlanto-Mediterranenas in most features, representing a reduced or smaller version of them.
      1. Danubians - Danubians are Small Mediterraneans that entered Europe from the East during the Neolithic and settled later in central Europe in considerable numbers. They mixed in the East with Ladogans and in central Europe with Hallstatt Cordeds. Today a few may be isolated in their pure form, but they are more numerous in their various blends like the Hallstatt Nordic or the Neo-Danubian (Danubian + Ladogan). Compared with other Small Mediterraneans, Danubians are characteristically globular and their face skeleton is weakly marked which, together with their thin skin, has the effect of making the cartilaginous parts of the face stand out. The tip of the nose has a peculiar rounded shape with uncompressed nostrils. The nose is straight or slightly concave. The orbits are low and large and the profile is often somewhat concave. The “Keltic Mediterraneans” have broader faces, lesser gracility, and more rounded features.
      2. Keltic Mediterraneans - This is a Small Mediterranean-like type referring to the gracile strain involved in the Keltic Nordic solution. It is likely but not certain that Carleton Coon would have considered this type of Danubian inspiration. In any event, this type was involved in central Europe in the formation of the Keltic type together with Keltic Cordeds. This type is broader faced, less gracile, and more rounded featured when compared with Danubians.
   2. Large Mediterraneans - Although quite variable in pigmentation, their features are often similar regardless of subtype yet at the same time different from those of Small Mediterraneans. Their heads are larger and their musculature more strongly marked. The noses are longer, and Cordeds often present much heavier browridges.
      1. Atlanto Mediterraneans - According to Carleton Coon: “Toward the end of the Neolithic period, the western Mediterranean countries were invaded by seafarers of a tall, exceptionally long-headed Mediterranean variety; some of these invaders passed through the Straits of Gibraltar, whence they also invaded the British Isles and Scandinavia.” These invaders were the Atlanto-Mediterraneans. The Atlanto-Mediterranean type is part of the Large Mediterranean family together with Corded and Irano-Afghan types. Its bony parts are not as pronounced as those of Cordeds or Irano-Afghans and its forehead is comparatively broader in view of vault height. It is closer to the earliest discovered forms of the Mediterranean race than any other type. The taxon, coined by Deniker, is given to the fact that seafarers of whom this type was representative invaded Europe from the Atlantic during the Neolithic; alternatively the term “Megalithic” is used for the type’s association with this culture. Atlanto-Mediterraneans have characteristically long skulls and noses and are usually tall. They seem to combine the large features of the Large Mediterranean groups without possessing their marked musculature and bigger bones and the nose is typically straight and less convex than is the case with the other Large Mediterranean types. In contrast to Cordeds and Irano-Afghans; their chin, malars and orbits are more rounded which gives the type a less “clear-cut” impression. The hair is often slightly wavy or straight and brown by pigment.
         1. Basque types - Racial types characteristic of the Basque people, resulting from dinaricisation of Atlanto Mediterranean types present in the region they inhabit. Coon comments: “The Basques are people who, although they lack political identity, are, none the less, a nation. They number about 800,000, of whom four-fifths live in Spain, and the remainder in France. Their country is clearly delimited by a linguistic boundary, and their ethnic solidarity is perpetuated not only by their language lout also by a community of archaic cultural practices, by special political privileges under the Spanish monarchy, by a distinctive headgear, and by the recognition of a characteristic physical type.” Basque types, as expected from their racial origin, present more prominent noses, fuller cheekbones and an overall more dinaric morphology if compared with unaltered Atlanto-Mediterraneans.
      2. Eastern Mediterranean supragroup - Compared to Atlanto-Meds, Eastern Meds often present more prominent noses and broader lips. They are also more robust and their features are fuller. The face is usually longer and in cases gaunt. Dinaricisation is unrelated to Eastern Mediterraneans, but the process affects them more often than any other branch of the Mediterranean group. If dinaricised Irano-Afghans are termed ‘Armenoid’ and dinaricised Nordics ‘Noric’, then the standard and traditional ‘Dinaric’ could be interpreted as dinaricisation of different forms of general Eastern Mediterranean affiliation.
         1. Cordeds/Nordics - Corded types are part of the Larger Mediterranenan family and they are closer morphologically to Irano-Afghans than to Atlanto-Mediterraneans. The name was coined by Coon for this type´s skeletal association with the Corded-Ware culture. Coon believes the type spread from the East into Europe during the Neolithic and states: “The Corded crania are larger than any from Egypt, and are metrically very similar to the Elmenteita skulls from East Africa - the two groups could be combined without loss of homogeneity. In Mesopotamia, they may be favorably compared with the three dynastic skulls from Ur, although they are higher vaulted than the other early groups. There has been much discussion over the origin of the Corded people, and many cradle-areas have been proposed. Childe, despite several objections which he himself raises, prefers to derive them from southern Russia, where the typical cultural elements of the Corded people are found mixed with other factors. The so-called boat-axe, the typical battle-axe form which they used, has relatives all the way to the Caucasus and beyond. And the horse, their use of which in the domestic form is not fully confirmed, since the grave examples might conceivably have been wild ones, was first tamed in Asia or in southern Russia. On the basis of the physical evidence as well, it is likely that the Corded people came from somewhere north or east of the Black Sea. The fully Neolithic crania from southern Russia which we have just studied include such a type, also seen in the midst of Sergi's Kurgan aggregation. Until better evidence is produced from elsewhere, we are entitled to consider southern Russia the most likely way station from which thre Corded people moved westward.” Cordeds are characterized by featuring a Mediterranean morphology that at the same time is also unusually long and heavy, with strongly marked features. The nose is often somewhat concave but it is mostly straight, differing in this regard and in its narrower features from the similar Irano-Afghan type. The Corded represents the idea of ’Nordic’ for most anthropologists.
            1. Keltic Cordeds - Similar to the Keltic type . This may be what Carleton Coon called the “purely long-headed element in the Keltic blend” and “ancestral proto-Kelts”. Historically all evidence points to this type having arrived from the East before the Iron Age and settling in central Europe. The type can be recognized by its pinched prominence of the nose, which is best seen on the right picture of the first raw, the nostrils are large and somewhat big, and the head and nose are remarkably long. The look is of a more robust, larger-faced Keltic type.
               • Keltic Nordic - This type was identified by Carleton Coon in his book ‘The Races of Europe’ and was coined as Nordic for its Corded-like Mediterranean nature. It appears to have been the most representative type of the Keltic peoples. This type can be explained by the blend of two elements present in central Europe before the Keltic migrations: besides a Corded element, there may also have been a small Mediterranean in play which gives the type a more rounded and shorter-headed appearance. The Keltic solution, unlike the Hallstatt, is predominantly Corded. The Keltic type is often mixed with central European Alpines or Dinarics, that were absorbed prior to its northern migrations. If the first is true then a dinaricization of the Keltic form is implied. In any case, these Dinaric influenced Kelts will show Dinaric features like a more salient nose, a protruding lower lip and a broader, more lateral morphology. Here I will present both examples of mixed and unmixed Kelts. Additionally Coon noted a variant of this type in the Aran isles, the Aran subtype, which features a lower vault. Carleton Coon commented that a way of diagnosing this type is by the ‘cylindrical’ profile of its vault and its convergent temporal bones, something that he also notes for its Corded strain. The forehead, rather than being plain, tends to converge laterally closing in the nasion, this convergence is done by raising at the same time its height.
                 • Aran subtype - A subtype of Keltic Nordic typical of the Aran Isles off the cost of Ireland. According to Carleton Coon “A special population, largely the product of isolation, has developed in the Aran Isles. Here a local Nordic type of great vault length and exceptionally low vault height, great facial and nasal length, and an excess of blue eyes and golden and red hair, has developed.” Its more convex nose as well as all other features are basically a more rounded and less extreme form of its Corded type and overall the Keltic Nordic logically presents Larger Mediterranean features of Corded inspiration.
            2. Hallstatt Corded - entered Europe from the east during the Neolithic and settled in central Europe. Combined with the Danubian type common there both were responsible for the creation of Nordics. Today both Corded and Danubian individuals may be found in areas with Nordic populations; and Hallstatt Cordeds and Danubians are more numerous than Hallstatt Nordics in Scandinavia. Compared to the other Corded types, its nose is prominent but not as much, and the face is narrower as well as are all other features. The nose is not as prominent as it is with the Keltic or Eastern Corded types, the eyes are typically big and the orbits high. The Hallstatt Corded constitutes a significant element of the Swedish population, where it arrived together with Hallstatt Nordics and Danubians.
               • Hallstatt Nordic - Much speculation has taken place concerning the definition and origins of “Nordics”. The principal reason for this dilemma was that there was no certainty as to what exactly a Nordic was: researchers could tell a “Nordic” look but they wouldn´t be able to define what it specifically meant, and not all these appearances were morphologically linked. Eventually, when they tried to come up with a conclusion, their Nordics had evidently different head forms. Other common mistakes were to assume appearances exclusive to northern Europe, such as unreduced Upper Paleolithic ones, were Nordic or to believe all blondism to be of Nordic origin. It was not until Carleton Coon´s understanding of morphologies and his analysis of the skeletal history of Europe, together with the help of other researchers, allowed him to aim for a conclusive solution that this issue was satisfactorily settled. His conclusion is basically that the racial situation in the countries believed to be “Nordic” is far more complex than it appeared and that no single racial type could hold credit for all distinctly northern European appearances. What Carleton Coon would later name as “Nordic”, which is the definition I will use here, is a Mediterranean form almost exclusive to Scandinavia brought by Iron-Age invaders that Coon believed was representative of the Hallstatt Culture. But this type is a combination of Mediterranean factors quite similar to those found outside of northern and central Europe. Most people commonly called ‘Nordic’ in popular anthropology would be considered Corded by Coon. The morphological similarity of Danubians with both Hallstatts and Small Mediterraneans illustrate that there is no room for the belief of a unique origin for the “Nordics” or other “Aurignacian” type. According to Coon, all anthropological evidence points towards the ‘Nordic’ race being formed in central Europe at some point between the Neolithic and the early Iron Age by the blend of two Mediterranean strains common there, the Hallstatt Corded (term used in this site to differentiate it from other Corded strains, Coon didn´t refer to any specific Corded subtype) and the Danubian. Coon introduces the Hallstatt type: “The Hallstatt crania from Austria, including those from the type site itself, form a reasonably homogeneous, entirely long-headed group. (See Appendix I, col. 32.) This group is the legitimate, local successor to the Aunjetitz, and like the latter it resembles the Danubian Neolithic series in many respects. In certain characters, however, it leans in a Corded direction, and these include a heightening of the orbits and a narrowing and lengthening of the nose. Certain of the individual crania are of definitely Corded type. Morphologically, as well as metrically, most of these skulls may without difficulty be designated as "Nordic"; the browridges are moderate, the foreheads moderately sloping, the occiputs protruding, the parietals flattened, the malars compressed, the mandibles deep. The stature was apparently moderately tall. The Austrian Hallstatt series has close connections in two directions: first, with the local Bronze Age and Neolithic populations of central Europe, which preceded it, and second, with the Germanic "Reihengräber" people who followed it after a Keltic interruption. The similarity between Hallstatt and Germanic crania is a commonplace; and if the Reihengräber people were "Nordic", as is generally conceded, then so, in all likelihood, were the Hallstatt people. The significance of this double continuity is great. It traces the Nordic racial type, in skeletal form, back to the Early Iron Age, and derives this with little alteration from the preceding Age of Bronze. The Bronze Age population which was thus the ancestral Nordic one was in turn derived from a mixture between the local Danubian Neolithic people, who came from the east, and the later Corded invaders. The complexity of the Middle and Late Bronze Age, therefore, and the disturbances caused by the introduction of cremation, during the latter part of the epoch, did not interrupt the racial continuity of central Europe, where racial movements, during the Late Bronze Age, seem to have been somewhat simpler than those of culture.” The Hallstatt type may be found in Scandinavia, specially in southern Sweden and southeastern Norway although it represents a tiny minority of their populations.
                 • Anglo-Saxon type - After the migration and settlement of the Hallstatt Nordic type in northern Europe; it encountered the older peoples inhabiting these territories which constituted a mixture of Corded and unreduced Upper Paleolithic factors. As Germanic culture emerged in the territories inhabited by these two groups, a numerically important and characteristic intermediate form involving these two peoples appeared. The type was named “Frisian” after its place of origin or “Anglo-Saxon” for the its eventual participation in the invasion of England. Carleton Coon, after examining the skeletal remains of the different Germanic tribes, believes this type was also the most representative of the Germanic migrations (the Voelkerwanderung). Morphologically, the type is basically Hallstatt. The Anglo-Saxon type carries all the way from the Hallstatt Nordic its predominantly Danubian factor. The Upper Palaeolithic influence, however, produces fuller cheekbones, a higher head with a characteristically longer ramus, fuller lips and a more prominent jaw. The Corded-influenced nose is often more beak-like and it is longer generating a characteristic angularity in the face that gives the type a somewhat “rigid” impression. The face is longer and heavier than the Hallstatt type, the skeleton is more marked, and the head is bigger.
            3. Eastern Cordeds - While the majority of Cordeds migrated in central and northern Europe and formed the Nordics, others remained in Russia and Eastern Europe. The type that will be referred here as ‘Eastern Corded’ is one Corded type that is numerically important there.
      3. Keltic - This type was identified by Carleton Coon in his book ‘The Races of Europe’ and was coined as Nordic for its Corded-like Mediterranean nature. It appears to have been the most representative type of the Keltic peoples. It derives from central European invaders which in turn arrived from Western Asia carrying a specific Eastern Mediterranean form. Carleton Coon commented that a way of diagnosing this type is by the ‘cylindrical’ profile of its vault and its convergent temporal bones. The forehead, rather than being plain, tends to converge laterally closing in the nasion, this convergence is done by raising at the same time its height. The Keltic type´s face is languid, long and narrow. Has a typical “triangular” shape and a pinched prominence of the nose.
      4. Irano-Afghans - Irano-Afghans are Large Mediterraneans common in most of the Middle East, Iran and Afghanistan. The name of the type was coined for its geographical distribution, originally as ‘Indo-Afghan’, by Deniker. Morphologically they are closer to Corded types than to Atlanto–Mediterraneans. Irano-Afghans present a typical combination of strongly pronounced nasal convexity and long and narrow features. Their nasal shape together with their usually broader morphologies distinguish them from the similar Corded type.
      5. Pontics - Pontics appear related on the one hand to Atlanto-Mediterraneans and on the other to Irano-Afghans. Their features are fuller and harder than those of Atlanto-Meds, and the eyes are rather small, with a small aperture; the foreheads are narrower and often higher Pontics are Large Mediterraneans present in certain regions of eastern Europe.
4. Their intermediates
   1. some Mediterraneans have blended with reduced Upper Paleolithic survivors
      1. Alpines + Mediterranean - When Alpines and Mediterraneans mix, their morphological intermediates often display non-intermediate features. The cause of this is a process Coon would call “dinaricization” because of the previous classification of these specimens as “dinaric” by other anthropologists. Coon explains: “From France to Macedonia, and from Istanbul to Samarkand, are found populations in which the majority of persons present a characteristic morphology of the head and face; with a brachycephalic skull, often flattish in the occipital region, the foramen magnum and auricular passages set disproportionately far to the rear, the forehead often sloping, the face frequently elongated, and the nose salient and frequently convex. People who possess these characteristics have been lumped together in one or more races; the Dinaric in Europe, the Armenoid in Asia, and the Noric to include the blond varieties. It is biologically unsound, however, to postulate any historic unity for individuals of these so-called races, since they are products not of an historical association but of a biological principle. ” Dinarics will display characteristically salient noses, a protruding lower lip often broader than of either type in the solutions, a flattish occiput, broader heads and a face that gives the impression of being narrower in its lower part as well as in the interorbital distance.
   2. Mediterraneans mixing with unreduced Upper Paleolithic survivors - These individuals are the result of Mediterraneans (often Nordics or Cordeds) mixing with unreduced Upper Paleolithic survivors. They represent a more classically intermediate form given there is little or no reduction involved and thus no dinarization. These intermediates occurred wherever Mediterraneans and unreduced Upper Paleolithic types were present and have been given a number of names depending on the specific solution and on the different types involved. One of such types is the Anglo-Saxon.
      1. Nordic + Phalian / Phalian-Borreby / Borreby
      2. Keltic Nordic + Bruenn
      3. Atlanto-Mediterranean + Bruenn
      4. Atlanto-Mediterranean + Keltic Nordic + Bruenn

---

*

the "Polish school of typology"
contributed far more than a cryptic diagram:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ed_Races_2.JPG

which is true. travel and research
was far more difficult over a century ago
(von eickstedt and carleton coon travelled the world
for field-research with greater ease)

and the rigour of their analysis extreme, so,

their schema is a note-able accomplishment
and deserves a place in "The Great Conversation".

1. Black Race
   1. "Negroidal"
   2. "Austro-African" Congo Negro
   3. "Nigritian" Sudan Negro
   4. Australoid
2. Black transitional to White
   1. "Mediterranoid" Indic: related to Mediterranean
   2. "Meridinal" East-African: related to Oriental - perhaps a mixture with Sudan Negro
3. White Race
   1. Oriental: east and south of the Medterranean Sea
   2. Mediterranean^Houzé: north and west of the Mediterranean Sea
      1. Mediterranean + Alpine = Pile-Dwelling
      2. Mediterranean + Armenoid = Littoral (Large Mediterranean^Coon - Atlanto-Mediterranean^Deniker)
      3. Mediterranean + Lappanoid = Pre-Slavic (Russians similar to "North Asiatic")
   3. Armenoid^{Von Luschan} (Vorderasiatische^Günther)
      1. Armenoid + Lappanoid = Alpine (Dinaric^Coon)
   4. Nordic
      1. Nordic + Lappanoid = Sub-Nordic^Deniker (geographycally Eastern Baltic)
      2. Nordic + Mediterranean = Northwestern (Irish)
      3. Nordic + Armenoid = Dinaric (Alpine^Coon, Adriatic^Biasutti)
4. Yellow transitional to White
   1. "Paleo-Asiatic" North Asiatic: Siberian sub-Mogoloids including Ainu
5. Yellow Race
   1. Lappanoid^{Quatrefages & Hamy} (very similar to...
   2. Central Asiatic: Mongols (obviously brachycephalic)
   3. "Pacific" East Asiatic: Chinese (taller and less brachycephalic than previous race)
   4. "Arctic" Esquimaux
   5. "Paleo-American" South American dolichocephalics (related to prehistoric Lagoa Santa skeletal race)

you are correct - anders,
the girl-child is eight-years-old (no longer six).

she will spontaneously dig through "the cabinet of all knowledge"
for the collection of classification-images. she neatly sorts them
on to the floor like a deck of cards or the periodic table of the elements
(just as she does with the five-by-eight-inch flash-cards of birds, flowers, molecules et caetera).

my son frequently adds more images
from the classification-threads on the inter-webs
to pique her interest.

to illustrate the "Polish school of typology" was highly influential, especially in some original way,
and provided a basis for future development - please, post appropriate url-links
to nordisk.nu / polish / cyrillic web-sites.

if you possess texts by czekanowski,
please - preserve them for world-wide scholarship at the internet archive.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._index.svg.png

*

earnest hooten's schema

1. White or Caucasoid Race
   1. Mediterranean
      1. Upper Paleolithic survivors (British Isles)
      2. Iranian Plateau
      3. Classic Mediterranean
         1. hook-nosed sub-type
         2. straight-nosed sub-type
   2. Ainu
   3. Keltic (light-eyed, dark or red hair, dolichocephalic, British Isles)
   4. Nordic
      1. Nordic + Alpine
      2. Nordic + Mediterranean
   5. Alpine
   6. East Baltic (blond brachycephalics)
   7. Armenoid (blend of Classic Mediterranean + Iranian Plateau + Alpine)
   8. White composites
      1. Australian (Archaic White + Tasmanian + minor Melanesian imput)
         1. Murrian (nearly White - particularly in South-East)
         2. Carpentarian (Melamesian increment in the North)
         3. Tasmanoid (refuge areas in Queensland)
      2. Indo-Dravidian (Classic Mediterranean + Australoid + Negrito + various minor imputs)
         1. Classic Indo-Dravidian (approaches Classic Mediterranean in Northern India)
         2. Armenoid + Iranian Plateau (Western and Southeastern India)
         3. Indo + Nordic (Northwestern Himalayas)
         4. Australoid or Veddoid (central and Southern India)
         5. Negritoid (small areas in Southern India)
      3. Polynesian (brunet White + Mongoloid + Melanesian)
2. Negroid Race
   1. African Negro or Negritian or Forest Negro
   2. Nilotic Negro (Hamitic Mediterranean imput)
   3. Negrito
      1. Infantile sub-type
      2. Adultiform sub-type (not present in Andamans or Philippines)
   4. Negroid composites
      1. Tasmanian (Negrito + Australian)
      2. Melanesian-Papuan (Negrito + Australoid + hook-nosed Classic Mediterranean + varying slight imput)
         1. Papuan
         2. Melanesian
      3. Bushman-Hottentot (Negrito + Boskop)
         1. Bushman
         2. Hottentot (Bushman + Negro + Hamitic Mediterranean)
3. Mongoloid Race
   1. Classic Mongoloid
   2. Arctic Mongoloid or Eskimoid (including Paleo-Asiatics to the East)
   3. Mongoloid composites
      1. Indonesian-Mongoloid or Indonesian-Malay (Mongoloid + Mediterranean + Ainu + Negrito)
      2. Malay-Mongoloid (Indonesia, East-most India and most Japanese)
      3. Indonesian (Paleo-Mongoloids in South China, East-most India and island interiors)
   4. American Indian (Mongoloid + Iranian Mediterranean + Australoid + minor Negritoid imput)
      1. Brachycephalics
         1. hawk-nosed sub-type
         2. snub-nosed sub-type
      2. Dolichocephalics
         1. hawk-nosed sub-type
         2. snub-nosed sub-type

and the others:

blumenbach, czekanowski, von eickstedt, coon
would depart on field-expeditions lasting a year or two

while others (lund, stanisław klimek et alia)
might journey to distant lands to study exotic races
and never return to their homes -

earnest hooten collated his race-chart
from the scholarly publications of other anthropologists.

while his compilation was state-of-the-art and comprehensive,
it is obvious to modern readers
that he had not (unlike the others) directly perceived his subject-matter.

hooten was (like coon) a popular writer of the time:
his many books, magazine and newspaper articles were well-received
and his cartoons (which accompanied them) are still being found
(clipped,saved and stored - by previous generations) in attics and basements.

his skills as a conversationalist and raconteur
guaranteed the many invitations that exposed his ideas
of race/racial integrity/eugenics to an audience beyond the upper-class.

while aristotle may have suspected the foundations of civilisation,
over two thousand years ago:

Quote:

---

autarkeia - to satisfy the natural requirements of sufficiency

oikonomike - the aquisition of wealth by the art of house-hold managment

chrematistke - the art of aquisition

kapelikon - retail trade

technikoteron - the studied technique which sought to discover the sources from which, and the methods by which, the greatest profit could be made

Ἀριστοτέλης, Πολιτικά I, 1256 b 26-1257 b 39

---

none would reveal to him the clan-secrets
with which a few families were rebuilding the civilisations :swl
that had been scraped from central eurasia by the glaciers
and deposited near the equator - only to be, later, flooded
under four hundred feet of glacial melt-water.

as max weber explained,

it was martin luther's rejection
of the typically mediterranean bandit-empire's "plunder & squander" paradigm

which led to values that drove people toward worldly achievements,
a hard work-ethic and saving to accumulate wealth for investment.
the new religions effectively forbade wastefully using hard-earned money,
identified the purchase of luxuries a sin,
made possible the capitalisation of the industrial revolution

and a middle-class whose children could expect a better life
than their parents had endured.

this newly-large segment of the population
was discussing earnest hooten's ideas in their parlours
after reading his books and articles.*

hungarian HUN	hungarian EN	hungarian RU	western EN	russian RU
VEDDO-AUSTRALOID	VEDDO-AUSTRALOID	ВЕДДО-АВСТРАЛИЙСКАЯ	AUSTRALOID	-
ausztraloid	australoid	австралийская	australoid	австралийская
tasmanid	tasmanoid	тасманийская	tasmanid	тасманийская
veddid	veddoid	веддоидная	veddid	цейлоно-зондская
ainuid	ainuid	айнская	ainuid	айнская
EUROPID	EUROPID	ЕВРОПЕОИДНАЯ	CAUCASOID	ЕВРОПЕОИДНАЯ
CROMAGNOID	CROMAGNOIDS	КРОМАНЬОИДНАЯ	CROMAGNOIDS	-
cromagnoid a	cromagnoid a	кроманьоидная a	dalofalid	западнобалтийская
кроманьоидная b	кроманьоидная b	кроманьоидная б	baltid	восточнобалтийская
cromagnoid c	cromagnoid c	кроманьоидная в	-	протоевропейская
NORDOID	NORDOIDS	НОРДИЧЕСКАЯ	NORDIC	-
proto-nordikus	proto-nordid	протонордическая	proto-nordic	-
nordikus	nordid	нордическая	nordic	-
MEDITERRÁN	MEDITERRANOIDS	СРЕДИЗЕМНОМОРСКАЯ	MEDITERRANOIDS	-
protomediterrán	proto mediterranean	протосредиземноморская	proto-mediterranean	-
atlanti mediterrán	atlanto mediterranean	атланто-средиземноморская	atlanto mediterranean	западносредиземноморская
gracilis mediterrán	gracile mediterranean	грацильный-средиземноморская	gracile mediterranean	западносредиземноморская
keleti mediterrán	eastern mediterranean	восточно-средиземноморская	-	-
SÖTÉT SZÍNKOMPLEXIÓJÚ RÖVIDFEJŰEK	SWARTHY BRACHYCEPHALS	ТЕМНОЙ КОМПЛЕКСИИ БРАХИЦЕФАЛИЯ	-	БАЛКАНО-КАВКАЗСКАЯ
lappid	lapponoid	лапоноидная	lapponoid	лапоноидная
alpi	alpinoid	альпийская	alpine	альпийская
dinári	dinarid	динарская	dinaric	динарская
elő-ázsiai	near eastern	арменоидный	taurid, armenoid	ассироидная
pamíri	pamirid	памиро-ферганская	pamirid	-
MIXOMORF	MIXOMORPH	МИКСОМОРФ	-	-
polinezid	polinesid	полинезийская	polinesian	полинезийская
MONGOLID	MONGOLOID	МОНГОЛОИДНАЯ	MONGOLOID	АЗИАТСКАЯ
TULAJDONKÉPPENI MONGOLIDOK	REAL MONGOLOIDS	НАСТОЯЩИЕ МОНГОЛОИДНАЯ	-	-
bajkáli (paleoszibériai)	baikal type (paleosiberian)	байкальская	-	байкальская
szinid (északkínai)	sinid (north chinese)	дальневосточная	sinid	дальневосточная
szajáni	sajanid	саянская	-	алтае-саянская
belső ázsiai mongolid (északi)	northmongoloid	североазиатская	tungid	североазиатская
dél-mongolid	south asian	южноазиатская	southeast asian	южномонгольская
EUROPO-MONGOLID	EUROPO-MONGOLOIDS	ЕВРОПО-МОНГОЛОИДНАЯ	-	-
uralid	uralid	уральская	uralid	уральская
turanid	turanid	тураниды	turanid	южносибирская
jenyiszeji típus (amerikanoid)	yenisei type	енисейская	-	енисейская
MIXOMORF	MIXOMORPH	МИКСОМОРФ	-	-
NEGRID	NEGROID	НЕГРОИДНАЯ	NEGROID	НЕГРОИДНАЯ
TULAJDONKÉPPENI NEGRID	REAL NEGROIDS	НАСТОЯЩИЕ НЕГРИЛЛЬСКАЯ	-	-
szudanid	sudanid	суданская	sudanid	суданская
nilotid	nilotid	нинотидская	nilotid	-
paleonegrid	paleonegrid	протонегрилльская	-	-
bantuid (kafrid)	bantuid	бантидская	bantuid	-
etiopid	ethiopid	эфиопская	ethiopid	эфиопская локальная
indomelanid	indomelanid	индо-меланезийская	-	-
NEGRO-AUSTRALID	NEGRO-AUSTRALOIDS	НЕГРО-АВСТРАЛОИДНАЯ	-	-
melanezid	melanesid	меланезийская	melanesid	меланезийская
paleomelanezid	paleomelanesid	протомеланезийская	-	-
PYGMID	PYGMOIDS	ПИГМЕИД	-	НЕГРИЛЛЬСКАЯ
bambutid	bambutid	мбутид	bambutid	-
negritid	negritid	негритосы	negritid	-
andamáni	adamanese type	андаманская	adamanese type	андаманская
aeta	aeta type	аэта	aeta type	негритосская филиппинская
semang	semang type	семангская	semang type	негритосская материковая
MIXOMORF	MIXOMORF	МИКСОМОРФ	-	-
khoisanid	khoisanid	бушменская	capoid	южноафриканская
AMERIKANID (MIXOMORF)	AMERICANOID	АМЕРИКАНОИДНАЯ	AMERIND	АМЕРИКАНОИДНАЯ
ÉSZAK-AMERIKAI	NORTH AMERICANS	СЕВЕРОАМЕРИКАНСКАЯ	NORTHAMERICAN	-
pacifid	pacifid	тихоокеанская	pacifid	тихоокеанская
szilvid	silvid	атлантическая	silvid	атлантическая
margid (paleoamerikanid)	margid	калифорнийская	margid	калифорнийская
centralid	centralid	центральноамериканская	centralid	центральноамериканская
DÉL-AMERIKAI	SOUTH AMERICANS	ЮЖНОАМЕРИКАНСКАЯ	SOUTHAMERICAN	-
andid	andid	андская	andid	андская
brazilid (amazoni)	amazonid	амазонская	amazonid	амазонская
lagid	lagid	лагидская	lagid	-
pampid (patagonid)	patagonid	патагонская	patagonid	патагонская