0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 18 Given: 22 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 227 Given: 207 |
Another new study by the same research group (http://link.springer.com/article/10....438-016-1267-z) states that
"...we revealed that a significant portion of the Hungarians probably originated from a long ago consolidated gene pool in Central Asia-South Siberia, which still persists in modern Hungarians. Another genetic layer of the early Hungarians was obtained during their westward migrations by admixing with various populations of European origin, and an important component of these was derived from the Caucasus region. Most of the modern populations, which are genetically closest relatives of ancient Hungarians, today speak non-Indo-European languages"
So, it seems that there is going to be a problem with the explanation of the origin of the Hungarian language....
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,994 |
Those samples are probably not from Magyars, but rather from assimilated locals after the conquest. As for Goths, could you be more patient and wait? 50 Gothic samples (Wielbark culture) from Poland will be published soon. I already have info about 4 out of these 50 samples. I know their Y-DNA haplogroups.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,994 |
Any Y-DNA haplogroups ??? Or just mtDNA ???89 Hungarian Conquerors' samplesp
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,994 |
http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/3794...raczki_PhD.pdf
Only mtDNA... ? Well, mtDNA is inherited from your mother.
And conquerors usually take local, conquered women as wifes.
So this is another worthless study, without any Y-DNA haplos.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,048 Given: 987 |
These percentages add up to a very huge amount of presumably mongoloid admixtures. I never saw such interpretation of genetic datas of hungarian people before, even the finns which have high amount of N-ydn, are consider indigenous european by the interpretation of their ynd-N. However, it seems to be of extreme minority given whatever kinds of conquesting leaders dna it may be.31% Eastern and Inner Asia
6% likely Eastern and Inner Asia
Last edited by Hexachordia; 02-20-2017 at 09:08 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,994 |
Huns married Gothic women (which is why you get Gothic mtDNA in a study without Y-DNA):
http://christogenea.org/references/o...goths-jordanes
"(...) in the third battle, when they [the Huns under Balamber and the Goths under Vinitharius] met each other unexpectedly at the river named Erac, Balamber shot an arrow and wounded Vinitharius in the head, so that he died. Then Balamber took to himself in marriage Vadamerca, the grand-daughter of Vinitharius, and finally ruled all the people of the Goths as his peaceful subjects (...)"
According to some sources Fredemundus of the Salian Franks (born in 394 AD) was one of sons of Balamber and Vadamerca. So Fredemundus had Germanic mtDNA, but Hunnic Y-DNA.
Atilla's mother could also be Germanic, but his father was Hunnic - Mundzuk (Μουνδίουχος).
Studies on conquerors which focus on mtDNA and ignore Y-DNA, are simply worthless.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,994 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks