For men dating women, is virginity important to you?

[Demon Revival]

True...and I'm one and only who caan specify that....what comes to my life (= what and which ways I value things).

Still I'm not one who would live in boring but stable marriage...where my husband could not...you know what. So better ''test'' that before get marry.

You need to find something slightly more valuable than that though, because even if he is "good" at that, and you are too, this will not survive the test of time. You will not be once you're both 60-70 years old. But your marriage still has to survive even without that, so the next gen is safe.

[Finnish Swede]

You need to find something slightly more valuable than that though, because even if he is "good" at that, and you are too, this will not survive the test of time. You will not be once you're both 60-70 years old. But your marriage still has to survive even without that, so the next gen is safe.

Of course...much more.

But I like to believe that if some things works well and there are clear care and feelings between each others...woman and man will naturally find much more common then times ago. If you get marry at age of 25 - 26 and you both will live 80 years old....the relationship will change and develop a lot on that period. And it is natural.

[AphroditeWorshiper]

obviously no

[ElCieloAzul2]

Who women fuck and what type of men and their backgrounds is a major indicator of their behavior and outlook on life. Factor in humans not being naturally monogamous creatures and the studies and evidence that shows and suggests that the more sexual partners you have the more you 'deprogram' yourself from our monogamous societal outlook. It then results in a person being more in-tune with the animalistic and sexual side of themselves, therefore lots of evidence would suggest that the more promiscious a man or woman the less likely they are to be able to fully commit or be capable of a long term monogamous relationship. And unless one is a cuck or wants to take an increased gamble/risk it would be wiser to see out a woman who is either 'brainwashed' via 'racism'/tribalism/religiousity or is intellectualized and realizes the reality of all this and therefore rejects the open promiscious lifestyle.

So yeah there are smart women on this very forum who are realists, racialists, 'tribal' and very loyal but also may have been promiscuous in their past. These women would be alright but in general I would hold that the more promiscuous the woman is the less likely she is to be able to see big picture. Intellectualized western women in tune with propaganda are in fact the most brainwashed of all. For my outlook on life I place a lot of value on tribalism/racialism/etc and the values of what allowed her to be promiscuous. The woman who is proud of 'fucking the rainbow' and goes out of her way to humiliate her father and men of her race/tribe by dating 'foreigners' is soulless and trashy. In that case I would much rather prefer the 'tribal slooot' who never considered any loyalty to men outside of her 'tribe' but with that said had a love for different men within her tribe.


So virginity to me is not so important as the numbers she has had and what type of men she banged. There are limits of course id prefer it is under say 10 partners with 15 being max. Ideally she would have like 2-5 and all have been high quality men and relationships.

[ElCieloAzul2]

I said yes in this poll given that the poll had very limited options and seemed to paint 2 extremes.

1) A virgin girl

2) A girl 'used up' by all types of men.

Id rather a virgin then the girl who was gangbanged and is throughout all cultures in history known to be lower in value. Really at that point she only wins points if she was 'slutty' within her tribe. That I can respect more so from an evolutionary point of view. However, I think another option should exist which says a woman has say between 2-5 partners, and then another option of between 5-10. And then another of say 10-15 and then +15

[Demon Revival]

I said yes.

Id rather a virgin then the girl who was gangbanged and is throughout all cultures in history known to be worthless in value. Really at that point she only wins points if she was 'slutty' within her tribe. That I can respect more so from an evolutionary point of view. However, I think another option should exist which says a woman has say between 2-5 partners, and then another option of between 5-10. And then another of say 10-15 and then +15

I can see your "cumulation" logic, but it isn't like this.

Already having one partner before you = chances of the marriage failing increase by 80%. The increase of fail rate increases drastically from 0 to 1, far more than from 1 to 5, or 5 to 10, or 10 to 20.

Also, even if she had no partners before you, and you fuck her anyway (before marriage) the chances of breaking increase too, although not as much as with other additional partners.

[la bombe]

Only men who are terrible in bed and/or sadists would care that much about a woman being a virgin. Sex with inexperienced partners is generally awkward, unpleasant and for female virgins, involves a lot of pain and discomfort.

[Demon Revival]

Much more accurate/realistic pole would go like this:

* Will you accept a girl/woman who is not a virgin anymore to mother of your child/chidren?

Great low key way of implying all absolutely girls are sluts who have slept around. While I generally agree most of you are sluts who can't keep their legs closed even if it meant saving your life, there are still women who understand the value of this.

* Or do you prefer not to have offsprings at all (= letting your bloodline to die)?


PS: I hope some here will choose the second option (offering ''a gift'' to mankind).

Mixing your bloodline with that of a slut, who will be 800% times more likely to divorce you and get into alimony, and raise a fatherless child who will likely become a LGTB flag carrier due to absent father figure and negligent mother?

I'd prefer let my bloodline die honorably, than deliberately water it down, making it inferior, diluted and non-optimal by choosing a slut out of desperation.

Only men who are terrible in bed and/or sadists would care that much about a woman being a virgin. Sex with inexperienced partners is generally awkward, unpleasant and for female virgins, involves a lot of pain and discomfort.

As usual, women can only see this kind of stuff in terms of "dick", "length", "sexual prowess" and "being terrible at bed". Here is a hint: none of these things will serve for securing a proper environment for a child to grow up, or a lasting relationship.

Try "being good at bed" once you're married, 70 years old, having lost all stamina. There are marriages who last even after that, despite sexual activity of the early marriage years is mostly gone.

[la bombe]

As usual, women can only see this kind of stuff in terms of "dick", "length", "sexual prowess" and "being terrible at bed". Here is a hint: none of these things will serve for securing a proper environment for a child to grow up, or a lasting relationship.

Try "being good at bed" once you're married, 70 years old, having lost all stamina. There are marriages who last even after that, despite sexual activity of the early marriage years is mostly gone.

I've been in a relationship for 3 and a half years, buddy. Neither of us were virgins when we met and we're both quite satisfied with that fact

Having a healthy sexual relationship is important to most people.

[Demon Revival]

I've been in a relationship for 3 and a half years, buddy. Neither of us were virgins when we met and we're both quite satisfied with that fact

I don't mean your random extended serial polygamy which is common in these eras, "buddy". I specifically mentioned establishing a family, and creating an optimal family environment for the next generation yet did not reply to any of it. I truly do not care about these vapid "luv" relationships that come and go, they are nothing more than glorified, extended one night stands.

Your own personal enjoyment or you "being happy with it" means jack shit in regards to family creation and raising the next gen.

This is what lack of virginity (in females at least) causes:







Now ask yourself, is this worth ALL the trouble just so one can say "OMG I am very good at bed, I can satisfy a used woman that was ravaged by 10 dudes before me"?

Having a healthy sexual relationship is important to most people.

It is pleasurable but it is not really important for anything that actually matters such as family creation. Because you will still be raising children even after you're unable to have sex properly.