Originally Posted by
Albobalboa
In Slavic languages yes. And then westerners heard the term Slavs, and started thinking about your one defining feature, turns out that was that you were people who were legal property of others, and forced to obey them. Thus the word slave derived from your ethnonym.
Imagine how fucking ridiculous that is. A fundamental word such as a slave, the literal bottom form of human existence, -one that is not only subdued to the max, but even lacks the dignity to resist- to be derived from an entire ethnicities' name. This is an insult that is too big to even fathom.
And you have the nerve to mention Illyrians, who although weren't the strongest of groups at the time were still a formiddable force that played a role in local politics. It wasn't until the Romans butchered the whole region that they were stopped, and even after that they became relevant in Rome. In my mind they are not even proto-Albanians and I think Albanians are some kind of unregistered group for the most part, that survived in the highlands. But your south slav theories are obnoxious.
Wtf did Slavs do besides procreate like rabbits. You are known in Europe as bottomfeeders even though you have pretty much the highest population group of the whole continent with by far the most natural resources. Even your migration to central Europe was as slaves of the Huns, jesus fucking christ.
Bookmarks