Beautiful Non-European Women

[Incal]

this is remarkable but nail extensions almost looks as frightening as this

That shit and botox are 2 of the worst addictions today women have.

[Sheppey]

This S--t is so silly it is hard to believe there is compulsory public education enforced where this writer lives.

“This almost universal negative attitude… needs further scrutiny. Its main source must be sought in the basic fact that the Jews, in spite of their having been Europeans for so many centuries, were still considered, even be themselves, to be utter strangers.”

— I. Barzilay (1956: 253

"The Jews, the eternal strangers and sojourners…”

—P. Johnson (1987: 568)

Hugh’s story was also inspiration for Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Prioress’s Tale,” a chapter in his Canterbury Tales, written in the late 1300s. The Prioress recounts the story of an unnamed Christian city in Asia with its own “Jewerye,” or Jewish ghetto. The Jews were enclosed there “for foule usure [usury]” and ill-gotten profits. The young son of a local widow takes to singing a Christian hymn as he walks through the town, which offends the Jews. Satan, who “hath in Jues herte [Jew’s heart] his wasps nest,” incites them to kill the boy:

Fro thennes forth the Jues han conspired

This innocent out of this world to chace.

An homicide therto han they hyred,

That in an aleye hadde a privee place.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau was also appalled by the crude partisan theology of the Old Testament. Speaking to the ancient Jews he said, “[You] paint us a God, angry, jealous, vengeful, partial, hating men, a God of war and bat-2 In Poliakov (1965: 119).

In Barzilay (1956: 254).

Your God is not ours. He who begins by selecting a chosen people, and proscribing the rest of mankind, is not our common father…”

(1769).7 Such men were “the vilest of peoples”; one is aghast at “the baseness of this people, incapable of any virtue,” a race that constituted “the vilest people perhaps who existed then.” Later, in a piece of backhanded praise for Moses, Rousseau wrote that the Jews were originally “a swarm of wretched fugitives, without arts, without weapons, without talents, without virtues, without courage…” To maintain their identity Moses gave the Hebrew tribe “customs and practices which are incompatible with those of other nations… to render it always a foreigner amongst other men.” To this day, the Jewish race displays a dogged persistence and adherence to its law, such that it “will last as long as the world, despite the hatred and persecution of the rest of the human race” (1772).8

Working about the same time as Rousseau, Baron d’Holbach—a major

figure among Enlightenment thinkers—unleashed a blistering attack on the Jews. In his Ecce Homo of 1770 he made the following observations:

[When] we cast our eyes over the history of the Jews… we are forced

to acknowledge, that this people were at all times the blindest, the most stupid, the most credulous, the most superstitious, and the silliest that ever appeared on the earth. … [By Mosaic Law,] the people of God were kept in a profound ignorance; in an abject superstition; in an unsocial and savage aversion for the rest of mankind; in an inveterate hatred of other forms of worship… [T]he Jewish people distinguished themselves only by massacres, unjust wars, cruelties, usurpations, and infamies… (1770/1813: 23-26)

Voltaire continues:

The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred against all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the good of others, always barbarous—cringing in misfortune, and insolent in prosperity.13

And the fundamental reason? “Money was the object of their conduct at

all times.”

A 1761 essay attacks the ancient Hebrews and their sorry state of social and intellectual development, and makes a sarcastic allusion to the old idea of a diseased people: “It was only in the matter of lice that they were out-done; for that reason it has accurately been said that the Jews know more than any other people about this profession.”14 Of the Old Testament, it

“prophesied on a hundred occasions that they would be the masters of the world: however, they never possessed more than a tiny corner of the Earth for a few years; today they haven’t even one village of their own.”

Stinging comments continued to flow from his pen:15

– “The Jews have never invented anything” (1767). Indeed, they are

“plagiarists in everything.”

– “You [Jews] are calculating animals, try to be thinking animals”

(1770).

– “[You] seem to be to be the maddest of the lot. … You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct, and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny” (1772).

– “[T]hese circumcised Jews [are] the greatest scoundrels who have ever sullied the face of the globe” (1773).

– And in the final year of his life: “If we must talk of Jewry, we must state that they were a wretched Arabic tribe without art or science, hidden in a small, hilly, and ignorant land…” (1776).

But it was one particular warning by Voltaire that weighs heavily upon us today. In 1771 he wrote:

[The Jews] are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.16

Looking back over the past 200 years, and seeing the prominent Jewish hand in slavery, war, oppression, governmental corruption, rampant capitalism, cultural degradation, financial fraud, environmental destruction…

and consider the price humanity has paid for these things, and the price we have yet to pay— deadly to the human race. Who shall dispute him?

[Goethe said,] “How should we let the Jews share in our highest culture, when they deny its origin and source?” And he became “violently

enraged” when the law of 1823 permitted marriage between Jews and

Germans, prophesying the “worst and most frightful consequences,”

particularly the “undermining of all moral feelings” and declaring that 22 In Chamberlain (1899: 345).



the bribery of the “all-powerful Rothschild” must be the cause of this “folly.”

It was around this time that renowned philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer

entered the fray. His masterpiece World as Will and Idea (1819) offered a handful of passing comments on Judaism, mostly neutral observations of history and religion. But in a passage on the development of the arts, he briefly turns to “the history of a small, isolated, capricious, hierarchical (i.e.

ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the Jews, despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of the West” (1969: 232). “It is to be regarded generally as a great misfortune,” he adds, “that the people whose former culture was to serve mainly as the basis of our own were not, say, the Indians or the Greeks, or even the Romans, but just these Jews.”

For the next three decades Schopenhauer said little about them. But he returned to the topic, in a very pointed manner, in his last major work Parerga and Paralipomena (1851). Volume 1 of the book begins with a sketch of the history of idealism, and the limitations of that metaphysical view. The classic idealists are closely allied with Judeo-Christian theology, and thus

“are all marred by that Jewish theism which is impervious to any investigation, dead to all research, and thus actually appears as a fixed idea” (1974: 15). But the subsequent essay, on the history of philosophy, brings the occasion for an extended diversion on the subject:

The real religion of the Jews, as presented and taught in Genesis and all the historical books up to the end of Chronicles, is the crudest of all religions because it is the only one that has absolutely no doctrine of immortality, not even a trace thereof. … The contempt in which the Jews were always held by contemporary peoples may have been due in great measure to the poor character of their religion. … Now this wretched religion of the Jews does not [offer any conception of an afterlife], in fact it does not even attempt it. It is, therefore, the crudest and poorest of all religions and consists merely in an absurd and revolting theism. … While all other religions endeavor to explain to the people by symbols and parables the metaphysical significance of life, the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry in the struggle with other nations. (125-126)


Volume 2 elaborates on these ideas. Schopenhauer reiterates that “the religion of the Jews occupy the lowest place among the dogmas of the civilized world” (301). This sets the tone for the chapter titled “On Religion,”

which brings this observation:

Also we should not forget God’s chosen people who, after they had stolen by Jehovah’s express command the gold and silver vessels lent to them by their old and trusty friends in Egypt, now made their murderous and predatory attack on the ‘Promised Land,’ with the murdererMoses at their head, in order to tear away from the rightful owners, by the same Jehovah’s express and constantly repeated command, showing no mercy and ruthlessly murdering and exterminating all the inhabitants, even the women and children. (357)

A footnote to the above passage adds this widely-cited remark:

Tacitus and Justinus have handed down to us the historical basis of the Exodus… We see from the two Roman authors how much the Jews

were at all times and by all nations loathed and despised. This may be partly due to the fact that they were the only people on earth who did not credit man with any existence beyond this life and were, therefore, regarded as beasts… Scum of humanity—but great master of lies [ grosse Meister im Lügen].— 23

The ultimate tragedy, for Schopenhauer, is that the pathetic Judeo-Christian culture dominated the history of Europe, rather than the nobler Greco-Roman: “The religion of the Greeks and Romans, those world-powers, has perished. The religion of the contemptible little Jewish race ( verachteten Judenvölkchens), on the other hand, has been preserved…” (393).

But the Hebrew tribe is not simply defined by a religion; “[i]t is an extremely superficial and false view to regard the Jews merely as a religious sect. … On the contrary, ‘Jewish Nation’ is the correct expression” (263).

Like Fichte and Herder, Schopenhauer was also concerned about the political consequences of integrating, and granting rights to, this Jewish Nation. The Jews were a “gens extorris” (refugee race), eternally uprooted, always searching for but never finding a homeland:

Schoppenhauer’s translator Payne mistranslates this sentence, interpreting the final phrase as “past master at telling lies.”


“The burning Jewish question of Poland is also… a burning question [in Russia] , where the numerical proportion of the Jews makes them of great moment amid a population whose language they rarely learn, and to whom they hence must remain eternal strangers.”

—H. and A. Zimmern (1882: 124)

Friedrich Nietzsche, of course, was himself one of the more notorious people to comment on the Jews :

albeit ambiguous—critics of Jews and Judaism. As early as 1869, at age 25, he was complaining in letters to Richard Wagner of “philosophical non-sense and pushy Jewry” as a cause of social degradation.13 Later, as he began to produce full works, nearly every one included relevant comments.

For example, in his early work Human, All-Too Human (1878) he observed in passing that “the youthful Jew of the stock exchange is the most repugnant invention of the whole human race” (sec. 475).

But it is his book Daybreak (1881) that inaugurates his stronger critique.

Here we find him remarking that the Jews were capable of “the coldest self-possession, [and of] the subtlest outwitting and exploitation of chance and misfortune”, and furthermore that “their souls have never known chivalrous noble sentiments nor their bodies handsome armor” (sec. 205).

Later, in a short but seminal passage, Nietzsche observes the following:

“The command ‘love your enemies’ had to be invented by the Jews, the best haters there have ever been” (sec. 377). He refers, of course, to the New Testament, especially passages such as Matthew (5:44) and Luke (6:27), in which Jesus proclaims this purported virtue. On Nietzsche’s view, the Jesus of the New Testament was largely an “invention” of Paul, who utilized the words and ideas of a mortal Jewish rabbi to initiate a hate-filled revenge plot against the occupying Roman Empire. Only a burning hatred toward Rome could spark the creation of a ‘religion of love.’ Paul was thus the quintessential Jew, turning a profound hatred into 13 In German: philosophischen Unfug und vordringliches Judenthum. Letter dated 22 May (BVN-1869,4).


something creative and vengeful. Jews, as the ultimate misanthropes, thus become the “best” haters in human history. The same idea recurs, paren-thetically, in The Gay Science (1882), in which Nietzsche sarcastically notes that the Jews are indeed ‘chosen’ people, precisely because “they had a more profound contempt for the human being in themselves than any other people” (sec. 136).

He was more specific in a personal notebook entry of 1885. “The dangers of the Jewish soul,” he wrote, include the fact, firstly, that “they try to gain a foothold in a parasitic manner.” Secondly, “they know how to

‘adapt’ themselves, as the scientists say.” Jews have become “born actors, like the octopi of Theognis, who take on the color of the rock they stick to”.14 As a result, “even the most honorable Jewish money-manager cannot resist reaching out his fingers, cold-bloodedly, for petty and fraudulent gains”.15 Nietzsche thus expresses concern about the Jewish tendency to dissembling

Martin Luther relentlessly hammers away for more than 150 pages:22

– “[B]e on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which

sheer self-glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and

men are practiced most maliciously and vehemently…”

– “Moreover, they are nothing but thieves and robbers who daily eat no morsel and wear no thread of clothing which they have not stolen

and pilfered from us by means of their accursed usury.”

– “[T]hey have not acquired a perfect mastery of the art of lying; they lie so clumsily and ineptly that anyone who is just a little observant can easily detect it.”

– “Alas, it cannot be anything but the terrible wrath of God which permits anyone to sink into such abysmal, devilish, hellish, insane baseness, envy, and arrogance.”

– “Undoubtedly they do more and viler things than those which we know and discover.”


Luther even resurrects, indirectly, the old foetor Judaicus: “It serves them right that… they have to look into the devil’s black, dark, lying behind, 21 Ibid., 140, 148, 149.

22 Ibid., pages 172, 242, 253, 261, and 289, respectively.

and falsehood; what are ‘actors,’ after all, but expert liars? On his view, the Jew is a chameleon-like parasite, a multi-armed octopus, one who misses no opportunity for ill-gotten gains.

By 1886 Nietzsche saw that Jewry was on the verge of dominating European culture: “That the Jews, if they wanted it… could even now have preponderance, indeed quite literally mastery over Europe, that is certain”

( Beyond Good and Evil, sec. 251). More importantly, he was now ready to lay out details of his account of a degrading, Jewish-inspired Christian “slave morality” that ultimately would defeat the virtuous Greco-Roman “master morality”:

The Jews have brought off that miraculous feat of an inversion of values, thanks to which life on earth has acquired a novel and dangerous attraction for a couple of millennia. … Their prophets… were the first to use the word ‘world’ as a term of contempt. This inversion of values… constitutes the significance of the Jewish people: they mark the beginning of the slave rebellion in morals. (sec. 195)

etc... etc... etc... etc...

“One might well ask, Why are there any Jews in the

world order? That would be exactly like asking, Why are

there potato bugs? Nature is dominated by the law of

struggle. There will always be parasites…”

— J. Goebbels (2019: 216)

[Sheppey]

This S--t is so silly it is hard to believe there is compulsory public education enforced where this writer lives.

There are only two possibilities: Either victory of the Aryan, or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew. …

And this recognition of the facts discloses at once a whole series of the most important fundamental principles that must guide this young movement which, we hope, is destined one day for greatness:

First, ‘National’ and ‘social’ are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded—through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism—not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory.

That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this movement, we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions—despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it ‘National Socialist.’ We said to ourselves that to be ‘national’ means, above everything, to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, even to die for it. And similarly to be ‘social’ means so to build up the State and the community of the people, such that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people, as to be ready to die for it.

And then we said to ourselves: there are no such things as classes; they cannot be. Class means caste, and caste means race. … With us in Germany, where everyone has the same eyes and speaks the same language, here there can be no class, here there can be only a single people…

And in the third place, it was clear to us that this particular view is based on an impulse that springs from our race and from our blood. We said to ourselves that race differs from race and, further, that each race in accordance with its fundamental demands externally displays certain specific tendencies, and these tendencies can perhaps be most clearly traced in their relation to the conception of work. The Aryan regards work as the foundation for the maintenance of the community of the people amongst its members; the Jew regards work as the means to the exploitation of other peoples. The Jew never works as a productive creator without the great aim of becoming the master. He works unproductively, using and enjoying other people’s work. And thus we understand the iron sentence that Mommsen once uttered:

“The Jew is the ferment of decomposition of peoples. ”This means that the Jew destroys, and must destroy, because he completely lacks the conception of an activity that builds up the life of the community.

And therefore it is beside the point whether the individual Jew is ‘decent’ or not. In himself he carries those characteristics that Nature has given him, and he cannot ever rid himself of those characteristics.

And to us he is harmful. Whether he harms us consciously or unconsciously, that is not our affair. We must consciously concern ourselves with the welfare of our own people. …

And finally, we were also the first to point out, on any large scale, a danger that insinuated itself into our midst—a danger that millions failed to realize and which will nonetheless lead us all into ruin: the Jewish danger. And today people are saying yet again that we were agitators. ...’ --Adolf Hitler

"The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours, satanically glaring at the unsuspecting girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and stealing her from her own people. He uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women, he strives to break down the last racial barriers for other peoples, even on a large scale. The Jews were and are responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the hated white race, and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that he himself might dominate.

A racially-pure people who are conscious of their blood can never be overcome by the Jew. In this world, he will only be the master over a bastardized people. That’s why he systematically tries to lower the racial quality of a people by a continuous poisoning of the individual." -- Adolf Hitler

“One might well ask, Why are there any Jews in the world order? That would be exactly like asking, Why are there potato bugs? Nature is dominated by the law of struggle. There will always be parasites…”

— J. Goebbels (2019: 216)

[Incal]

[Incal]

copypasta

copypasta

And this is the same dude who told me:

You changed the subject by making a proposition ex concessis rather than ad rem you low IQ retard :



^the reason why this thread is now off topic is because of you but your IQ is too low to be aware of this state of affairs.

Anyway, too late. He's been banned again.

[Khinerai]

Mexican bombshell

[Your Old Comrade]

Jasmine Sendar
Curaçao/Netherlands

[Incal]

Japanese-Peruvian:

[Incal]

[Incal]